Reliability and Differences of Jump Kinetics Related to Different Load in College Male Athletes

C. Chuang, Ching-Hung Lin, Cheng-Wen Wu, Kuo-Chuan Lin
{"title":"Reliability and Differences of Jump Kinetics Related to Different Load in College Male Athletes","authors":"C. Chuang, Ching-Hung Lin, Cheng-Wen Wu, Kuo-Chuan Lin","doi":"10.30958/ajspo.8-4-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to explore reliability and differences of jump kinetics related to different training load in college male athletes. The subjects were required to perform countermovement jump (CMJ) and loaded countermovement jump (LCMJ-0%, LCMJ-20% and LCMJ-80% of one-repetition maximum squat) three times for each load which were recorded by a force plate. One-way repeated measures ANOVA and the LSD post hoc method were employed to evaluate the results. The results reveled that jump kinetics-related parameters increased/decreased by the load. Compared with the loading jumps, the CMJ incorporate with an arm swing directly led to an increase in eccentric contraction duration during jumping. Most of the jump mechanical parameters under substantially different load conditions fall within the good to excellent reliability. It appears that the CMJ and CMJ with extra load were reliable in explore the kinetics related parameters. Keywords: countermovement jump, one-repetition maximum, arm swing, eccentric contraction","PeriodicalId":8622,"journal":{"name":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF SPORTS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF SPORTS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30958/ajspo.8-4-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore reliability and differences of jump kinetics related to different training load in college male athletes. The subjects were required to perform countermovement jump (CMJ) and loaded countermovement jump (LCMJ-0%, LCMJ-20% and LCMJ-80% of one-repetition maximum squat) three times for each load which were recorded by a force plate. One-way repeated measures ANOVA and the LSD post hoc method were employed to evaluate the results. The results reveled that jump kinetics-related parameters increased/decreased by the load. Compared with the loading jumps, the CMJ incorporate with an arm swing directly led to an increase in eccentric contraction duration during jumping. Most of the jump mechanical parameters under substantially different load conditions fall within the good to excellent reliability. It appears that the CMJ and CMJ with extra load were reliable in explore the kinetics related parameters. Keywords: countermovement jump, one-repetition maximum, arm swing, eccentric contraction
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
男大学生运动员不同负荷下跳跃动力学的信度及差异
摘要本研究旨在探讨男性大学生运动员在不同训练负荷下跳跃动力学的信度及差异。要求受试者在每次负荷下做3次反动作跳(CMJ)和负重反动作跳(LCMJ-0%、LCMJ-20%和LCMJ-80%的单次最大蹲量),用测力板记录。采用单因素重复测量方差分析和LSD事后分析方法对结果进行评价。结果表明,跳跃动力学相关参数随载荷的增加而增加/减少。与负荷跳跃相比,臂摆结合的CMJ直接导致跳跃时偏心收缩持续时间的增加。在不同载荷条件下,大多数跳变机械参数的可靠性都在良好到优异的范围内。CMJ和附加载荷的CMJ在探索动力学相关参数方面是可靠的。关键词:反向跳跃,单次最大重复,手臂摆动,偏心收缩
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why No Swimming in the Ancient Olympics? Analyzing the Efficiency of Passing Networks in Soccer Foreign Players in the Greek Football League: Evidence from the 2023-24 Regular Season Gadamer’s Hermeneutic Universality of Play: The Greatest Form of Human Play is Art and its Signification to Movement Education A Mathematical Analysis of Team Impact and Individual Player Contribution in Football
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1