Modelling the determinants of swing ratio and bias in US House elections 1850–1980

David W. Brady, Bernard Grofman
{"title":"Modelling the determinants of swing ratio and bias in US House elections 1850–1980","authors":"David W. Brady,&nbsp;Bernard Grofman","doi":"10.1016/0260-9827(91)90037-U","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Electoral data for the US Congress for the period 1850 to 1980 are analyzed. We distinguish two important features of the seats-votes relationship that are often confounded: swing ratio and partisan bias. The swing ratio and electoral bias are shown to be a product of the shape of the constituency partisan distribution (CPD). We confirm earlier research showing that the decline in the congressional swing ratio noted by Tufte (1973) and Calvert and Ferejohn (1984) among others can largely be attributed to a reduction in the number of competitive House seats which has been ongoing for at least 70 years and has, for the entire country, exhibited a near straight-line decline in moving average over virtually the entire period. But, following Gudgin and Taylor (1979), we also show that the swing ratio is responsive to the kurtosis of the distribution of Democratic vote share across congressional districts. Finally, we show that partisan bias is responsive to the skewness of this distribution.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101034,"journal":{"name":"Political Geography Quarterly","volume":"10 3","pages":"Pages 254-262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0260-9827(91)90037-U","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Geography Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/026098279190037U","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Electoral data for the US Congress for the period 1850 to 1980 are analyzed. We distinguish two important features of the seats-votes relationship that are often confounded: swing ratio and partisan bias. The swing ratio and electoral bias are shown to be a product of the shape of the constituency partisan distribution (CPD). We confirm earlier research showing that the decline in the congressional swing ratio noted by Tufte (1973) and Calvert and Ferejohn (1984) among others can largely be attributed to a reduction in the number of competitive House seats which has been ongoing for at least 70 years and has, for the entire country, exhibited a near straight-line decline in moving average over virtually the entire period. But, following Gudgin and Taylor (1979), we also show that the swing ratio is responsive to the kurtosis of the distribution of Democratic vote share across congressional districts. Finally, we show that partisan bias is responsive to the skewness of this distribution.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1850-1980年美国众议院选举摇摆比和偏见的决定因素建模
本文分析了1850年至1980年美国国会的选举数据。我们区分了席位-选票关系中经常被混淆的两个重要特征:摇摆比和党派偏见。摇摆比率和选举偏见被证明是选区党派分布(CPD)形状的产物。我们证实了早期的研究表明,Tufte(1973)、Calvert和Ferejohn(1984)等人指出的国会摇摆率的下降,在很大程度上可以归因于众议院竞争席位的减少,这种情况已经持续了至少70年,而且在整个国家,几乎整个时期的移动平均线都呈现出接近直线的下降。但是,根据Gudgin和Taylor(1979)的研究,我们还表明,摇摆比对民主党在国会选区的选票份额分布的峰度有响应。最后,我们表明党派偏见对这种分布的不均匀是有反应的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interstate conflict over exchanges of homeland territory, 1816–1980 The global environmental movement: Reclaiming paradise The capitalist imperative: Territory, technology and industrial growth The new geopolitics of minerals: Canada and international resource trade Caring for workers' dependents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1