{"title":"Beauty, the Person, and Disability: Understanding (and Defending) the Intrinsic Beauty and Value of the Person with Disabilities","authors":"Theresa Farnan","doi":"10.1353/QUD.2016.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In February 2012, the British Journal of Medical Ethics published a paper that garnered notoriety for its central premise. In “After birth abortion: why should the baby live?” authors Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva argue that infanticide as well as abortion should be legal in cases of babies born with disabilities.1 They focus on two disabilities—Treacher Collins syndrome and Down syndrome—as instances where infanticide should be permitted. Let me state at the outset that I absolutely reject their claim that unborn and newborn human beings lack the moral status of personhood, as well as their abhorrent conclusion that it is acceptable to kill them.2 In this paper, however, I would like to focus on a more subtle aspect of their","PeriodicalId":40384,"journal":{"name":"Quaestiones Disputatae","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaestiones Disputatae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/QUD.2016.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In February 2012, the British Journal of Medical Ethics published a paper that garnered notoriety for its central premise. In “After birth abortion: why should the baby live?” authors Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva argue that infanticide as well as abortion should be legal in cases of babies born with disabilities.1 They focus on two disabilities—Treacher Collins syndrome and Down syndrome—as instances where infanticide should be permitted. Let me state at the outset that I absolutely reject their claim that unborn and newborn human beings lack the moral status of personhood, as well as their abhorrent conclusion that it is acceptable to kill them.2 In this paper, however, I would like to focus on a more subtle aspect of their
2012年2月,《英国医学伦理学杂志》(British Journal of Medical Ethics)发表了一篇论文,因其中心前提而声名狼藉。在《产后流产:为什么婴儿应该活下去?》作者Alberto Giubilini和Francesca Minerva认为,对于出生时就有残疾的婴儿,杀婴和堕胎都应该是合法的他们把重点放在了两种残疾——特里切尔·柯林斯综合症和唐氏综合症——作为杀婴行为应该被允许的例子。请允许我首先声明,我绝对反对他们关于未出生和新生的人类缺乏人格的道德地位的说法,以及他们关于可以接受杀死他们的令人憎恶的结论然而,在本文中,我想把重点放在他们的一个更微妙的方面