Islamism, Political Islam, and the Need for Critique

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION Perichoresis Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.2478/perc-2021-0018
P. Cliteur
{"title":"Islamism, Political Islam, and the Need for Critique","authors":"P. Cliteur","doi":"10.2478/perc-2021-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article is about Islamism (or political Islam) as a challenge for contemporary liberal democracies. Islamism is portrayed as an ideology that favors one specific religion as supreme and that is a threat to freedom of speech. The author makes a plea for distinguishing a. the religion of Islam, b. Muslims as a group, and c. the political ideology of Islamism. Regarding the dangers of Islamism, some sociological research about the convictions of Muslims is discussed (Koopmans, Esposito) and the most recent case from the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg—E.S. v. Austria (2018: 38450/12)—is analysed, which renders all criticism of Islam and Islamism difficult, if not impossible.","PeriodicalId":40786,"journal":{"name":"Perichoresis","volume":"33 1","pages":"69 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perichoresis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/perc-2021-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This article is about Islamism (or political Islam) as a challenge for contemporary liberal democracies. Islamism is portrayed as an ideology that favors one specific religion as supreme and that is a threat to freedom of speech. The author makes a plea for distinguishing a. the religion of Islam, b. Muslims as a group, and c. the political ideology of Islamism. Regarding the dangers of Islamism, some sociological research about the convictions of Muslims is discussed (Koopmans, Esposito) and the most recent case from the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg—E.S. v. Austria (2018: 38450/12)—is analysed, which renders all criticism of Islam and Islamism difficult, if not impossible.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊斯兰主义、政治伊斯兰和批判的需要
这篇文章是关于伊斯兰主义(或政治伊斯兰)对当代自由民主的挑战。伊斯兰主义被描绘成一种意识形态,认为某一特定宗教至高无上,这是对言论自由的威胁。作者呼吁区分a.伊斯兰教;b.穆斯林作为一个群体;c.伊斯兰主义的政治意识形态。关于伊斯兰主义的危险,本书讨论了一些关于穆斯林被定罪的社会学研究(库普曼斯,埃斯波西托),以及斯特拉斯堡欧洲人权法院最近的一个案例。v.奥地利(2018:38450/12)——这使得所有对伊斯兰教和伊斯兰主义的批评变得困难,如果不是不可能的话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perichoresis
Perichoresis RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rev 3:10: Rapture or Preservation? Analyzing Professions of Faith in the Fourth Gospel: is Everyone Who Believes Saved? Sin and Perfection in 1 John Theological Affinities Between the Fourth Gospel and the Book of Revelation John and the Synoptic Gospels. What John Knew and What John Used
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1