A comprehensive review on resolving ambiguities in natural language processing

Apurwa Yadav , Aarshil Patel , Manan Shah
{"title":"A comprehensive review on resolving ambiguities in natural language processing","authors":"Apurwa Yadav ,&nbsp;Aarshil Patel ,&nbsp;Manan Shah","doi":"10.1016/j.aiopen.2021.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Natural language processing is a known technology behind the development of some widely known AI assistants such as: SIRI, Natasha, and Watson. However, NLP is a diverse technology used for numerous purposes. NLP based tools are widely used for disambiguation in requirement engineering which will be the primary focus of this paper. A requirement document is a medium for the user to deliver one's expectations from the software. Hence, an ambiguous requirement document may eventually lead to misconceptions in a software. Various tools are available for disambiguation in RE based on different techniques. In this paper, we analyzed different disambiguation tools in order to compare and evaluate them. In our survey, we noticed that even though some disambiguation tools reflect promising results and can supposedly be relied upon, they fail to completely eliminate the ambiguities. In order to avoid ambiguities, the requirement document has to be written using formal language, which is not preferred by users due to its lack of lucidity and readability. Nevertheless, some of the tools we mentioned in this paper are still under development and in future might become capable of eliminating ambiguities. In this paper, we attempt to analyze some existing research work and present an elaborative review of various disambiguation tools.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100068,"journal":{"name":"AI Open","volume":"2 ","pages":"Pages 85-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aiopen.2021.05.001","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666651021000127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Natural language processing is a known technology behind the development of some widely known AI assistants such as: SIRI, Natasha, and Watson. However, NLP is a diverse technology used for numerous purposes. NLP based tools are widely used for disambiguation in requirement engineering which will be the primary focus of this paper. A requirement document is a medium for the user to deliver one's expectations from the software. Hence, an ambiguous requirement document may eventually lead to misconceptions in a software. Various tools are available for disambiguation in RE based on different techniques. In this paper, we analyzed different disambiguation tools in order to compare and evaluate them. In our survey, we noticed that even though some disambiguation tools reflect promising results and can supposedly be relied upon, they fail to completely eliminate the ambiguities. In order to avoid ambiguities, the requirement document has to be written using formal language, which is not preferred by users due to its lack of lucidity and readability. Nevertheless, some of the tools we mentioned in this paper are still under development and in future might become capable of eliminating ambiguities. In this paper, we attempt to analyze some existing research work and present an elaborative review of various disambiguation tools.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自然语言处理中歧义的解决综述
自然语言处理是一些广为人知的人工智能助手(如SIRI、娜塔莎和沃森)开发背后的一项已知技术。然而,NLP是一种用于多种目的的多样化技术。基于自然语言处理的工具广泛用于需求工程中的消歧,这将是本文的主要焦点。需求文档是用户从软件中交付期望的媒介。因此,模棱两可的需求文档可能最终导致软件中的误解。基于不同的技术,可使用各种工具来消除正则中的歧义。在本文中,我们分析了不同的消歧工具,以便比较和评价它们。在我们的调查中,我们注意到,尽管一些消歧工具反映了有希望的结果,并且可以被认为是可靠的,但它们不能完全消除歧义。为了避免歧义,需求文档必须使用形式语言编写,由于缺乏清晰性和可读性,用户不喜欢这种语言。然而,我们在本文中提到的一些工具仍在开发中,将来可能能够消除歧义。在本文中,我们试图分析一些现有的研究工作,并提出了各种消歧工具的详细综述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
45.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
GPT understands, too Adaptive negative representations for graph contrastive learning PM2.5 forecasting under distribution shift: A graph learning approach Enhancing neural network classification using fractional-order activation functions CPT: Colorful Prompt Tuning for pre-trained vision-language models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1