Modeling the acceptance and resistance to use mobile contact tracing apps: a developing nation perspective

IF 3.1 3区 管理学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Online Information Review Pub Date : 2023-03-27 DOI:10.1108/oir-10-2021-0533
M. Kwarteng, Alex Ntsiful, C. Osakwe, K. Ofori
{"title":"Modeling the acceptance and resistance to use mobile contact tracing apps: a developing nation perspective","authors":"M. Kwarteng, Alex Ntsiful, C. Osakwe, K. Ofori","doi":"10.1108/oir-10-2021-0533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study proposes and validates an integrated theoretical model involving the theory of planned behavior (TPB), health belief model (HBM), personal norms and information privacy to understand determinants of acceptance and resistance to the use of mobile contact tracing app (MCTA) in a pandemic situation.Design/methodology/approachThis study draws on online surveys of 194 research respondents and uses partial least squares structural equation modeling (PL-SEM) to test the proposed theoretical model.FindingsThe study establishes that a positive attitude towards MCTA is the most important predictor of individuals' willingness to use MCTA and resistance to use MCTA. Furthermore, barriers to taking action positively influence resistance to the use of MCTA. Personal norms negatively influence resistance to the use of MCTA. Information privacy showed a negative and positive influence on willingness to use MCTA and use the resistance of MCTA, respectively, but neither was statistically significant. The authors found no significant influence of perceived vulnerability, severity, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control on either acceptance or use resistance of MCTA.Originality/valueThe study has been one of the first in the literature to propose an integrated theoretical model in the investigation of the determinants of acceptance and resistance to the use of MCTA in a single study, thereby increasing the scientific understanding of the factors that can facilitate or inhibit individuals from engaging in the use of a protection technology during a pandemic situation.Peer reviewThe peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-10-2021-0533","PeriodicalId":54683,"journal":{"name":"Online Information Review","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Information Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-10-2021-0533","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThis study proposes and validates an integrated theoretical model involving the theory of planned behavior (TPB), health belief model (HBM), personal norms and information privacy to understand determinants of acceptance and resistance to the use of mobile contact tracing app (MCTA) in a pandemic situation.Design/methodology/approachThis study draws on online surveys of 194 research respondents and uses partial least squares structural equation modeling (PL-SEM) to test the proposed theoretical model.FindingsThe study establishes that a positive attitude towards MCTA is the most important predictor of individuals' willingness to use MCTA and resistance to use MCTA. Furthermore, barriers to taking action positively influence resistance to the use of MCTA. Personal norms negatively influence resistance to the use of MCTA. Information privacy showed a negative and positive influence on willingness to use MCTA and use the resistance of MCTA, respectively, but neither was statistically significant. The authors found no significant influence of perceived vulnerability, severity, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control on either acceptance or use resistance of MCTA.Originality/valueThe study has been one of the first in the literature to propose an integrated theoretical model in the investigation of the determinants of acceptance and resistance to the use of MCTA in a single study, thereby increasing the scientific understanding of the factors that can facilitate or inhibit individuals from engaging in the use of a protection technology during a pandemic situation.Peer reviewThe peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-10-2021-0533
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟使用手机接触追踪应用程序的接受和抵制:一个发展中国家的视角
目的本研究提出并验证了一个涉及计划行为理论(TPB)、健康信念模型(HBM)、个人规范和信息隐私的综合理论模型,以了解大流行情况下移动接触者追踪应用(MCTA)接受和抵制的决定因素。设计/方法/方法本研究利用194名研究对象的在线调查,并使用偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PL-SEM)来检验所提出的理论模型。研究结果表明,对MCTA的积极态度是个体使用MCTA意愿和抵制使用MCTA的最重要预测因素。此外,采取行动的障碍对抵制使用MCTA产生了积极影响。个人规范负向影响抗拒使用MCTA。信息隐私对MCTA的使用意愿和使用抗拒分别有负向和正向影响,但均无统计学意义。作者发现感知脆弱性、严重性、主观规范和感知行为控制对MCTA的接受和使用抵抗均无显著影响。该研究是文献中首次在单一研究中提出一个综合理论模型来调查接受和抵制使用MCTA的决定因素的研究之一,从而增加了对在大流行情况下促进或抑制个人使用保护技术的因素的科学理解。同行评议本文的同行评议历史可在:https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-10-2021-0533
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Online Information Review
Online Information Review 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
16.10%
发文量
67
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The journal provides a multi-disciplinary forum for scholars from a range of fields, including information studies/iSchools, data studies, internet studies, media and communication studies and information systems. Publishes research on the social, political and ethical aspects of emergent digital information practices and platforms, and welcomes submissions that draw upon critical and socio-technical perspectives in order to address these developments. Welcomes empirical, conceptual and methodological contributions on any topics relevant to the broad field of digital information and communication, however we are particularly interested in receiving submissions that address emerging issues around the below topics. Coverage includes (but is not limited to): •Online communities, social networking and social media, including online political communication; crowdsourcing; positive computing and wellbeing. •The social drivers and implications of emerging data practices, including open data; big data; data journeys and flows; and research data management. •Digital transformations including organisations’ use of information technologies (e.g. Internet of Things and digitisation of user experience) to improve economic and social welfare, health and wellbeing, and protect the environment. •Developments in digital scholarship and the production and use of scholarly content. •Online and digital research methods, including their ethical aspects.
期刊最新文献
A contribution-based indicator of research productivity: theoretical definition and empirical testing in the field of communication Bibliometric analysis of literature on social media trends during the COVID-19 pandemic Open science policies as regarded by the communities of researchers from the basic sciences in the scientific periphery Shaming behavior in online communities: exploring a new configuration of digital conversations Who corrects misinformation online? Self-perceived media literacy and the moderating role of reflective judgment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1