OPTIMUM LEVEL OF POSITIVE END-EXPIRATORY PRESSURE IN ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME CAUSED BY INFLUENZA A(H1NI)PDM09: BALANCE BETWEEN MAXIMAL END-EXPIRATORY VOLUME AND MINIMAL ALVEOLAR OVERDISTENSION.

Yaroshetskiym A I, D. Protsenko, P. V. Boytsov, V. B. Chentsov, S. Nistratov, O. N. Kudlyakov, V. V. Solov'ev, Zh I Banova, N. V. Shkuratova, N. A. Rezenov, B. R. Gel'fand
{"title":"OPTIMUM LEVEL OF POSITIVE END-EXPIRATORY PRESSURE IN ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME CAUSED BY INFLUENZA A(H1NI)PDM09: BALANCE BETWEEN MAXIMAL END-EXPIRATORY VOLUME AND MINIMAL ALVEOLAR OVERDISTENSION.","authors":"Yaroshetskiym A I, D. Protsenko, P. V. Boytsov, V. B. Chentsov, S. Nistratov, O. N. Kudlyakov, V. V. Solov'ev, Zh I Banova, N. V. Shkuratova, N. A. Rezenov, B. R. Gel'fand","doi":"10.18821/0201-7563-2016-6-425-432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"THE AIM\nto determine optimum level ofpositive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) according to balance between maxi- mal end-expiratory lung volume (EEL V)(more than predicted) and minimal decrease in exhaled carbon dioxide volume (VCO) and then to develop the algorithm of gas exchange correction based on prognostic values of EEL K; alveolar recruitability, PA/FiO2, static compliance (C,,,) and VCO2.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\n27 mechanically ventilatedpatients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) caused by influenza A (HINJ)pdm09 in Moscow Municipal Clinics ICU's from January to March 2016 were included in the trial. At the beginning of the study patients had the following characteristic: duration offlu symptoms 5 (3-10) days, p.0/FiO2 120 (70-50) mmHg. SOFA 7 (5-9), body mass index 30.1 (26.4-33.8) kg/m², static compliance of respiratory system 35 (30-40) ml/mbar: Under sedation and paralysis we measured EELV, C VCO and end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration (EtCO) (for CO₂ measurements we fixed short-term values after 2 min after PEEP level change) at PEEP 8, 11,13,15,18, 20 mbar consequently, and incase of good recruitability, at 22 and 24 mbar. After analyses of obtained data we determined PEEP value in which increase in EELV was maximal (more than predicted) and depression of VCO₂ was less than 20%, change in mean blood pressure and heart rate were both less than 20% (measured at PEEP 8 mbar). After that we set thus determined level of PEEP and didn't change it for 5 days.\n\n\nRESULTS\nComparision of predicted and measured EELV revealed two typical points of alveloar recruiment: the first at PEEP 11-15 mbar, the second at PEEP 20-22 mbar. EELV measured at PEEP 18 mbar appeared to be higher than predicted at PEEP 8 mbar by 400 ml (approx.), which was the sign of alveolar recruitment-1536 (1020-1845) ml vs 1955 (1360-2320) ml, p=0,001, Friedman test). we didn't found significant changes of VCO₂ when increased PEEP in the range from 8 to 15 mbar (p>0.05, Friedman test). PEEP increase from 15 to 18 mbar and more lead to decrease in VCO₂ (from 212 (171-256) ml/min to 200 (153-227) ml/min, p<0,0001, Friedman test, which was the sign of overdistension. Next decrease of VCO₂ was observed at PEEP increase from 22 to 24 mbar (from 203 (174-251 ml/min) to 185 (182-257) ml/min, p=0.0025, Friedman test). Adjusted PEEP value according to balance between recruitment and overdistension was higher than the one initially set (16(15-18) mbar vs 12(7-15) mbar, p <0.0001). We observed increase of SpO₂ from 93 (87-96) to 97(95-100)% (p<0.0001 followed by decrease in inspiratory oxygen fraction from 60(40-80) to 50(40-60)%(p<0.0001). Low EELV VCO₂ and VCO₂/EtCO₂ at PEEP 8 mbar has low predictive value for death (AUROC 0,547, 0706 and 0.596, respectively).Absolute EELV value at PEEP 18 and 20 mbar were poor predictors of mortality (AUROC 0.61 and 0.65 respectively) Alveolar recruit ability was measured by subtraction of EELV at PEEP 20 and at PEEP II mbar - value below 575 ml was a good predictor of death (sensitivity 75%, specificity 88%, AUROC 0.81). Lowering of VCO₂ at PEEP 20 mbar to less than 207 ml/min was a marker of alveolar overdistension and associated with poor prognosis (sensitivity 83%, specificity 88%, AUROC 0,89). C has poor predictive value at PEEP 8 and 20 mbar (AUROC 0,58 and 0,74 respectively.\n\n\nConclusion\nPEEP adjustment in ARDS due to influenza A (H1N1) pdm09 in accordance with balance between recruitment and overdistension (based on EELV and VCO measurements) can improve gas exchange, probably, not leading to right ventricular failure. This value of \"balanced\" PEEP is in the range between 15 and 18 mbar: Low lung recruitabiilty is associated with poor prognosis. Measurements of EELV and VCO₂ at PEEP 8 and 20 mbar can be used to make a decision on whether to keep \"high\" PEEP level or switch to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patient with ARDS due to influenza A (N1H1).","PeriodicalId":7795,"journal":{"name":"Anesteziologiia i reanimatologiia","volume":"648 1","pages":"425-432"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesteziologiia i reanimatologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18821/0201-7563-2016-6-425-432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

THE AIM to determine optimum level ofpositive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) according to balance between maxi- mal end-expiratory lung volume (EEL V)(more than predicted) and minimal decrease in exhaled carbon dioxide volume (VCO) and then to develop the algorithm of gas exchange correction based on prognostic values of EEL K; alveolar recruitability, PA/FiO2, static compliance (C,,,) and VCO2. MATERIALS AND METHODS 27 mechanically ventilatedpatients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) caused by influenza A (HINJ)pdm09 in Moscow Municipal Clinics ICU's from January to March 2016 were included in the trial. At the beginning of the study patients had the following characteristic: duration offlu symptoms 5 (3-10) days, p.0/FiO2 120 (70-50) mmHg. SOFA 7 (5-9), body mass index 30.1 (26.4-33.8) kg/m², static compliance of respiratory system 35 (30-40) ml/mbar: Under sedation and paralysis we measured EELV, C VCO and end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration (EtCO) (for CO₂ measurements we fixed short-term values after 2 min after PEEP level change) at PEEP 8, 11,13,15,18, 20 mbar consequently, and incase of good recruitability, at 22 and 24 mbar. After analyses of obtained data we determined PEEP value in which increase in EELV was maximal (more than predicted) and depression of VCO₂ was less than 20%, change in mean blood pressure and heart rate were both less than 20% (measured at PEEP 8 mbar). After that we set thus determined level of PEEP and didn't change it for 5 days. RESULTS Comparision of predicted and measured EELV revealed two typical points of alveloar recruiment: the first at PEEP 11-15 mbar, the second at PEEP 20-22 mbar. EELV measured at PEEP 18 mbar appeared to be higher than predicted at PEEP 8 mbar by 400 ml (approx.), which was the sign of alveolar recruitment-1536 (1020-1845) ml vs 1955 (1360-2320) ml, p=0,001, Friedman test). we didn't found significant changes of VCO₂ when increased PEEP in the range from 8 to 15 mbar (p>0.05, Friedman test). PEEP increase from 15 to 18 mbar and more lead to decrease in VCO₂ (from 212 (171-256) ml/min to 200 (153-227) ml/min, p<0,0001, Friedman test, which was the sign of overdistension. Next decrease of VCO₂ was observed at PEEP increase from 22 to 24 mbar (from 203 (174-251 ml/min) to 185 (182-257) ml/min, p=0.0025, Friedman test). Adjusted PEEP value according to balance between recruitment and overdistension was higher than the one initially set (16(15-18) mbar vs 12(7-15) mbar, p <0.0001). We observed increase of SpO₂ from 93 (87-96) to 97(95-100)% (p<0.0001 followed by decrease in inspiratory oxygen fraction from 60(40-80) to 50(40-60)%(p<0.0001). Low EELV VCO₂ and VCO₂/EtCO₂ at PEEP 8 mbar has low predictive value for death (AUROC 0,547, 0706 and 0.596, respectively).Absolute EELV value at PEEP 18 and 20 mbar were poor predictors of mortality (AUROC 0.61 and 0.65 respectively) Alveolar recruit ability was measured by subtraction of EELV at PEEP 20 and at PEEP II mbar - value below 575 ml was a good predictor of death (sensitivity 75%, specificity 88%, AUROC 0.81). Lowering of VCO₂ at PEEP 20 mbar to less than 207 ml/min was a marker of alveolar overdistension and associated with poor prognosis (sensitivity 83%, specificity 88%, AUROC 0,89). C has poor predictive value at PEEP 8 and 20 mbar (AUROC 0,58 and 0,74 respectively. Conclusion PEEP adjustment in ARDS due to influenza A (H1N1) pdm09 in accordance with balance between recruitment and overdistension (based on EELV and VCO measurements) can improve gas exchange, probably, not leading to right ventricular failure. This value of "balanced" PEEP is in the range between 15 and 18 mbar: Low lung recruitabiilty is associated with poor prognosis. Measurements of EELV and VCO₂ at PEEP 8 and 20 mbar can be used to make a decision on whether to keep "high" PEEP level or switch to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patient with ARDS due to influenza A (N1H1).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲型流感(h1ni) pdm09引起的急性呼吸窘迫综合征的最佳呼气末正压水平:最大呼气末容积和最小肺泡过度膨胀之间的平衡
目的:根据最大呼气末肺容积(EEL V)(高于预测值)和最小呼出二氧化碳量(VCO)减少之间的平衡,确定呼气末正压(PEEP)的最佳水平,然后根据EEL K的预后值开发气体交换校正算法;肺泡恢复能力,PA/FiO2,静态顺应性(C…)和VCO2。材料与方法选取2016年1 - 3月在莫斯科市属医院ICU接受机械通气治疗的甲型流感(HINJ)pdm09型急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者27例。在研究开始时,患者具有以下特征:流感症状持续时间5(3-10)天,p /FiO2 120 (70-50) mmHg。SOFA 7(5-9),体重指数30.1 (26.4-33.8)kg/m²,呼吸系统静态适应性35 (30-40)ml/mbar:在镇静和麻痹状态下,我们测量了EELV, C - VCO和潮汐末二氧化碳浓度(EtCO)(对于CO₂测量,我们在PEEP水平变化后2分钟后固定短期值),因此在PEEP 8,11,13,15, 18,20 mbar,在恢复良好的情况下,在22和24 mbar。在分析获得的数据后,我们确定了EELV增加最大(超过预期),VCO₂下降小于20%的PEEP值,平均血压和心率变化均小于20%(在PEEP 8毫巴时测量)。之后,我们设定了这样确定的PEEP水平,5天没有改变它。结果预测值与实测值的比较显示了两个典型的肺泡增生点:第一个点在PEEP 11 ~ 15 mbar,第二个点在PEEP 20 ~ 22 mbar。在PEEP 18 mbar时测得的EELV似乎比在PEEP 8 mbar时预测的高400 ml(大约),这是肺泡招募的迹象-1536 (1020-1845)ml vs 1955 (1360-2320) ml, p= 0.001, Friedman检验)。在8 ~ 15 mbar的PEEP范围内,我们没有发现VCO₂的显著变化(p>0.05, Friedman检验)。PEEP从15 mbar增加到18 mbar或更多,导致VCO₂下降(从212 (171-256)ml/min降至200 (153-227)ml/min, p< 0.0001,弗里德曼试验,这是过度膨胀的迹象。当PEEP从22 mbar增加到24 mbar(从203 (174-251 ml/min)增加到185 (182-257)ml/min, p=0.0025, Friedman检验)时,观察到下一次VCO₂下降。根据恢复和过度膨胀之间的平衡调整后的PEEP值高于最初设定的值(16(15-18)mbar vs 12(7-15) mbar, p <0.0001)。我们观察到SpO₂从93(87-96)%增加到97(95-100)% (p<0.0001),吸入氧分数从60(40-80)%下降到50(40-60)%(p<0.0001)。低EELV VCO₂和VCO₂/EtCO₂在PEEP 8 mbar时对死亡的预测价值较低(AUROC分别为0,547,0706和0.596)。EELV绝对值在PEEP 18和20 mbar时是死亡率的不良预测指标(AUROC分别为0.61和0.65)。肺泡再生能力通过减去PEEP 20和PEEP II mbar时的EELV来测量,低于575 ml的EELV值是死亡的良好预测指标(敏感性75%,特异性88%,AUROC 0.81)。在PEEP 20 mbar时,VCO₂降低至207 ml/min以下是肺泡过度扩张的标志,与预后不良相关(敏感性83%,特异性88%,AUROC 0.89)。C在PEEP为8和20 mbar时的预测值较差(AUROC分别为0.58和0.74)。结论根据EELV和VCO测量结果,调整甲型H1N1流感pdm09所致ARDS患者的peep可改善气体交换,可能不会导致右心衰。“平衡”PEEP值在15 - 18mbar之间:肺恢复能力低与预后差有关。甲型流感(N1H1)所致急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者在PEEP 8和20mbar时的EELV和VCO₂测量可用于决定是否保持“高”PEEP水平或切换体外膜氧合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[EPISTAXIS DURING NASOTRACHEAL INTUBATION. ATTILA'S SYNDROME.] [PARTICIPATION OF AROMATIC MICROBIAL METABOLITES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF SEVERE INFECTION AND SEPSIS.] [PREDICTORS OF UNFAVORABLE OUTCOME IN PATIENTS WITH ABDOMINAL SEPSIS.] [THE CHOICE OF PERIOPERATIVE MULTIMODAL ANALGESIA IN PATIENTS WITH LUMBAR HERNIATED DISC: THE PRELIMINARY RESULTS.] [MODERN VIEWS ON THE PHARMACOGENETICS OF PAIN.]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1