“Where Do You Draw the Line?”: Working Out the Boundaries between “Art” and “Non-Art” in Life Drawing Classes

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Ethos Pub Date : 2022-07-06 DOI:10.1111/etho.12347
Rotem Steinbock, Yehuda C. Goodman
{"title":"“Where Do You Draw the Line?”: Working Out the Boundaries between “Art” and “Non-Art” in Life Drawing Classes","authors":"Rotem Steinbock,&nbsp;Yehuda C. Goodman","doi":"10.1111/etho.12347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Based on participant observations in life drawing classes at an art academy in Jerusalem, this article examines the diverse ways artists-in-the-making work out the boundaries between “art” and “non-art.” First, the classes serve as a rite of passage in which actors deploy discursive, spatial, and sensorial practices to relate to and represent the live model as a unique object of art. Second, using the model evokes moral deliberations through which students attempt to articulate how an “artistic” way of seeing the body differs from other uses of an exposed (mainly female) body prevalent in society. Third, students positioned as religious <i>others</i> negotiate their participation in this Western artistic tradition, using their alterity to destabilize the art/non-art boundary. These various negotiations demonstrate how the “art” category and art students’ sense of an artistic self, body, and belonging are formed through a pragmatic, relational, and multifaceted boundary work.</p>","PeriodicalId":51532,"journal":{"name":"Ethos","volume":"50 2","pages":"251-271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/etho.12347","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethos","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/etho.12347","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on participant observations in life drawing classes at an art academy in Jerusalem, this article examines the diverse ways artists-in-the-making work out the boundaries between “art” and “non-art.” First, the classes serve as a rite of passage in which actors deploy discursive, spatial, and sensorial practices to relate to and represent the live model as a unique object of art. Second, using the model evokes moral deliberations through which students attempt to articulate how an “artistic” way of seeing the body differs from other uses of an exposed (mainly female) body prevalent in society. Third, students positioned as religious others negotiate their participation in this Western artistic tradition, using their alterity to destabilize the art/non-art boundary. These various negotiations demonstrate how the “art” category and art students’ sense of an artistic self, body, and belonging are formed through a pragmatic, relational, and multifaceted boundary work.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“你的底线在哪里?”:在写生课上厘清“艺术”与“非艺术”的界限
基于参与者在耶路撒冷一所艺术学院的素描课上的观察,这篇文章探讨了艺术家们在“艺术”和“非艺术”之间界限的不同方式。首先,这些课程作为一种仪式,演员们在其中运用话语、空间和感官实践,将现场模型作为一种独特的艺术对象来联系和表现。其次,使用这个模型唤起了道德思考,通过这个模型,学生们试图阐明一种“艺术”的方式看待身体与社会上普遍存在的其他裸露(主要是女性)身体的不同之处。第三,被定位为宗教他人的学生在参与西方艺术传统的过程中进行谈判,利用他们的替代性来破坏艺术/非艺术边界的稳定。这些不同的谈判展示了“艺术”类别和艺术学生的艺术自我、身体和归属感是如何通过务实、关系和多方面的边界工作形成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethos
Ethos Multiple-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Ethos is an interdisciplinary and international quarterly journal devoted to scholarly articles dealing with the interrelationships between the individual and the sociocultural milieu, between the psychological disciplines and the social disciplines. The journal publishes work from a wide spectrum of research perspectives. Recent issues, for example, include papers on religion and ritual, medical practice, child development, family relationships, interactional dynamics, history and subjectivity, feminist approaches, emotion, cognitive modeling and cultural belief systems. Methodologies range from analyses of language and discourse, to ethnographic and historical interpretations, to experimental treatments and cross-cultural comparisons.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information - TOC Gaming lounges in India afford socially productive gambling: The moral economy and foundations of play in Udaipur, Rajasthan Disclosure imperatives and women's subjectivities in an emergent culture of sexual trauma testimony Learning to walk in the forest Embodying the nuclear: The moral struggle of family care in postfallout Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1