Make Mine Melody: Building Beloved Community in Bibliography Using Mad Citation Practice

IF 0.1 4区 艺术学 N/A FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION FILM CRITICISM Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.1353/crt.2022.a899735
Sarah Madoka Currie
{"title":"Make Mine Melody: Building Beloved Community in Bibliography Using Mad Citation Practice","authors":"Sarah Madoka Currie","doi":"10.1353/crt.2022.a899735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Bibliography can be reconstructed to privilege the imaginaries of radicals that are \"lesser known.\" The dis-visibilizing of marginalized neurodiverse scholars and theorycrafters has much in common with the institutionalization approaches that constrict and model obstructed life for neurodivergent bodyminds. In a proposal for mad citation practice, a series of hopeful strategies for nonretrofitted inclusivity and authorial diversity are constructed for the reader instead, which bear similarities to feminist and disabled care practices: explicit permission-setting, naming ontology, lived or living experience validity, commentary or subscript authorization, visibilized quotation selection, draft approval, and cocollaborator approvals all form the basis of a radically collaborative citation methodology that seeks to generate roundtable-format conversations in print, ones that are self-selected within mad communities and feature a heavy roster of neurodivergent or disabled scholars, artists, and authors. In mad citation, the draft writer is less the \"manuscript author\" and more equivalent to a \"conversation facilitator,\" charged with weaving the myriad kaleidoscopic voices of the movement they seek to represent. This refiguring of the author/collaborator and reader/writer valences are central to a citation futurity that situates power not in the hands of the scholar holding the pen but in the hands of the collective they seek to speak with.","PeriodicalId":42834,"journal":{"name":"FILM CRITICISM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FILM CRITICISM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/crt.2022.a899735","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Bibliography can be reconstructed to privilege the imaginaries of radicals that are "lesser known." The dis-visibilizing of marginalized neurodiverse scholars and theorycrafters has much in common with the institutionalization approaches that constrict and model obstructed life for neurodivergent bodyminds. In a proposal for mad citation practice, a series of hopeful strategies for nonretrofitted inclusivity and authorial diversity are constructed for the reader instead, which bear similarities to feminist and disabled care practices: explicit permission-setting, naming ontology, lived or living experience validity, commentary or subscript authorization, visibilized quotation selection, draft approval, and cocollaborator approvals all form the basis of a radically collaborative citation methodology that seeks to generate roundtable-format conversations in print, ones that are self-selected within mad communities and feature a heavy roster of neurodivergent or disabled scholars, artists, and authors. In mad citation, the draft writer is less the "manuscript author" and more equivalent to a "conversation facilitator," charged with weaving the myriad kaleidoscopic voices of the movement they seek to represent. This refiguring of the author/collaborator and reader/writer valences are central to a citation futurity that situates power not in the hands of the scholar holding the pen but in the hands of the collective they seek to speak with.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制作我的旋律:用疯狂的引文实践在书目中建立心爱的社区
摘要:参考书目可以重构,以赋予那些“鲜为人知”的激进分子的想象力。边缘化的神经多样性学者和理论家的不可见性与制度化的方法有很多共同之处,这些方法限制和模拟了神经多样性身心的障碍生活。在疯狂引用实践的建议中,作者为读者构建了一系列有希望的非改造包容性和作者多样性策略,这些策略与女权主义和残疾人护理实践有相似之处:明确的许可设置、命名本体、生活或生活经验的有效性、评论或下标授权、可见的引文选择、草案批准和合作者批准,所有这些都构成了一种激进的协作引用方法的基础,这种方法寻求在印刷品中产生圆桌形式的对话,这些对话是在疯狂的社区中自我选择的,并以神经分歧或残疾学者、艺术家和作者的大量名单为特色。在疯狂的引用中,草稿作者与其说是“手稿作者”,不如说是“对话促进者”,负责编织他们试图代表的运动的千变万化的声音。这种对作者/合作者和读者/作者的价值的重新定位是引文未来的核心,这种未来的权力不再掌握在拿笔的学者手中,而是掌握在他们寻求与之交谈的集体手中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
FILM CRITICISM
FILM CRITICISM FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Film Criticism is a peer-reviewed, online publication whose aim is to bring together scholarship in the field of cinema and media studies in order to present the finest work in this area, foregrounding textual criticism as a primary value. Our readership is academic, although we strive to publish material that is both accessible to undergraduates and engaging to established scholars. With over 40 years of continuous publication, Film Criticism is the third oldest academic film journal in the United States. We have published work by such international scholars as Dudley Andrew, David Bordwell, David Cook, Andrew Horton, Ann Kaplan, Marcia Landy, Peter Lehman, Janet Staiger, and Robin Wood. Equally important, FC continues to present work from emerging generations of film and media scholars representing multiple critical, cultural and theoretical perspectives. Film Criticism is an open access academic journal that allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose except where otherwise noted.
期刊最新文献
Fast Zombies and Social Rights: The Case of Umberto Lenzi’s Nightmare City (1980) Neo-Imperial Island Fantasy in Contemporary French Reality TV: The Case of Koh-Lanta The Guilty Spectator: Sexuality, Age, Crime and Dario Argento’s Deep Red (1975) “To Become a Devil”: Special Effects, Magic Tricks, and the Technological Image in Faust Transforming Cultural Memory: Inglorius Basterds (2009)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1