Why did rich families increase their fertility? Inequality and marketization of child care

IF 2.3 1区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Economic Growth Pub Date : 2018-09-25 DOI:10.20955/wp.2018.022
Michael Bar, Moshe Hazan, Oksana Leukhina, David Weiss, Hosny Zoabi
{"title":"Why did rich families increase their fertility? Inequality and marketization of child care","authors":"Michael Bar, Moshe Hazan, Oksana Leukhina, David Weiss, Hosny Zoabi","doi":"10.20955/wp.2018.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A negative relationship between income and fertility has persisted for so long that its existence is often taken for granted. One economic theory builds on this relationship and argues that rising inequality leads to greater differential fertility between rich and poor. We show that the relationship between income and fertility has flattened between 1980 and 2010 in the US, a time of increasing inequality, as high income families increased their fertility. These facts challenge the standard theory. We propose that marketization of parental time costs can explain the changing relationship between income and fertility. We show this result both theoretically and quantitatively, after disciplining the model on US data. We explore implications of changing differential fertility for aggregate human capital. Additionally, policies, such as the minimum wage, that affect the cost of marketization, have a negative effect on the fertility and labor supply of high income women. We end by discussing the insights of this theory to the economics of marital sorting.","PeriodicalId":48110,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Growth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Growth","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20955/wp.2018.022","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

A negative relationship between income and fertility has persisted for so long that its existence is often taken for granted. One economic theory builds on this relationship and argues that rising inequality leads to greater differential fertility between rich and poor. We show that the relationship between income and fertility has flattened between 1980 and 2010 in the US, a time of increasing inequality, as high income families increased their fertility. These facts challenge the standard theory. We propose that marketization of parental time costs can explain the changing relationship between income and fertility. We show this result both theoretically and quantitatively, after disciplining the model on US data. We explore implications of changing differential fertility for aggregate human capital. Additionally, policies, such as the minimum wage, that affect the cost of marketization, have a negative effect on the fertility and labor supply of high income women. We end by discussing the insights of this theory to the economics of marital sorting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么富裕家庭会提高生育率?儿童保育的不平等和市场化
收入和生育率之间的负相关关系持续了很长时间,以至于它的存在常常被认为是理所当然的。一种建立在这种关系之上的经济理论认为,不平等的加剧导致贫富之间的生育率差异更大。我们表明,在1980年至2010年期间,收入与生育率之间的关系趋于平缓,这是一个不平等加剧的时期,因为高收入家庭提高了生育率。这些事实对标准理论提出了挑战。我们提出父母时间成本的市场化可以解释收入与生育之间的变化关系。在对美国数据进行训练后,我们从理论上和定量上证明了这一结果。我们探讨了变化的差异生育率对总人力资本的影响。此外,影响市场化成本的政策,如最低工资,对高收入妇女的生育率和劳动力供应有负面影响。最后,我们将讨论这一理论对婚姻分拣经济学的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Growth, is designed to serve as the principal outlet for theoretical as well as empirical research in economic growth and dynamic macroeconomics. The editorial board consists of prominent researchers in the fields of economic growth, dynamic macroeconomics, international economics, urban economics, migration, and development, who are committed to academic excellence. Members of the editorial board are actively involved in the refereeing process of each paper and assure that the review process is of an exceptional quality. Furthermore, the journal commits itself to a timely response. The journal encourages the submission of high quality research broadly concerned with: Neoclassical Growth Models Endogenous Growth Models Income Distribution and Growth Human Capital and Growth Fertility and Growth Trade and Growth Development and Growth Financial Development and Growth Migration and Growth Endogenous Technological Change Money and Growth Political Economy and Growth Overlapping-Generations Models Economic Fluctuations. 5-Year Impact Factor: 6.032 (2008)* Subject Category ''Economics'': Rank 3 of 209 Officially cited as: J Econ Growth
期刊最新文献
Nepotism vs. intergenerational transmission of human capital in Academia (1088–1800) The long-term implications of destruction during the Second World War on private wealth in Germany Floods, droughts, and environmental circumscription in early state development: the case of ancient Egypt Religion and persecution Labor scarcity, technology adoption and innovation: evidence from the cholera pandemics in 19th century France
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1