Efficiency of coronavirus inactivation on environmental surfaces: A comparison study of two available disinfectants

K. Barr, S. Ronca, Rodney X. Sturdivant, D. Harris
{"title":"Efficiency of coronavirus inactivation on environmental surfaces: A comparison study of two available disinfectants","authors":"K. Barr, S. Ronca, Rodney X. Sturdivant, D. Harris","doi":"10.5430/jha.v10n5p1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There are many coronaviruses of significant medical and veterinary concern, all of which are the result of spillover from another species. Disinfection of healthcare and veterinary environments is an important factor in limiting the transmission of coronaviruses. Disinfection agents for coronaviruses use bleach, quaternary compounds, hydrogen peroxide, and sodium hydroxide. Product labels list contact times that range from 10-30 minutes for total inactivation. Decon7 is a combination disinfectant that is currently used in the food and agriculture, medical facilities, and other industries. While Decon7 has been shown to inactivate a variety of pathogens and disrupt biofilms, its effectiveness and rate of coronavirus inactivation has not been evaluated.Objective: This project sought to evaluate Decon7’s effectiveness and rate of coronavirus inactivation.Methods: This study evaluated the disinfection efficacy of Decon7 (diluted at 1:4) and bleach (diluted at 1:10) after 3 coronaviruses (SARS-CoV-2, HCoV OC43, and HCoV NL63) were inoculated onto up to sixteen environmental surface materials.Results: A 1:4 dilution of Decon7 inactivated all coronaviruses on all surfaces with 1 minute contact time. A 1:10 dilution of bleach was not effective in inactivating coronaviruses with a contact time of 1 minute on all surfaces.Conclusions: New technologies and chemistries may offer more efficient inactivation of pathogens on environmental surfaces. These disinfection methods and materials, which require less than 10 minutes contact time, may improve the efficacy of cleaning and disinfecting surfaces in the built environment.","PeriodicalId":15872,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Administration","volume":"C-24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/jha.v10n5p1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are many coronaviruses of significant medical and veterinary concern, all of which are the result of spillover from another species. Disinfection of healthcare and veterinary environments is an important factor in limiting the transmission of coronaviruses. Disinfection agents for coronaviruses use bleach, quaternary compounds, hydrogen peroxide, and sodium hydroxide. Product labels list contact times that range from 10-30 minutes for total inactivation. Decon7 is a combination disinfectant that is currently used in the food and agriculture, medical facilities, and other industries. While Decon7 has been shown to inactivate a variety of pathogens and disrupt biofilms, its effectiveness and rate of coronavirus inactivation has not been evaluated.Objective: This project sought to evaluate Decon7’s effectiveness and rate of coronavirus inactivation.Methods: This study evaluated the disinfection efficacy of Decon7 (diluted at 1:4) and bleach (diluted at 1:10) after 3 coronaviruses (SARS-CoV-2, HCoV OC43, and HCoV NL63) were inoculated onto up to sixteen environmental surface materials.Results: A 1:4 dilution of Decon7 inactivated all coronaviruses on all surfaces with 1 minute contact time. A 1:10 dilution of bleach was not effective in inactivating coronaviruses with a contact time of 1 minute on all surfaces.Conclusions: New technologies and chemistries may offer more efficient inactivation of pathogens on environmental surfaces. These disinfection methods and materials, which require less than 10 minutes contact time, may improve the efficacy of cleaning and disinfecting surfaces in the built environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种消毒剂对环境表面冠状病毒灭活效果的比较研究
背景:有许多冠状病毒引起了重大的医学和兽医关注,所有这些都是其他物种溢出的结果。卫生保健和兽医环境的消毒是限制冠状病毒传播的一个重要因素。冠状病毒的消毒剂使用漂白剂、季元化合物、过氧化氢和氢氧化钠。产品标签列出接触时间范围从10-30分钟为完全失活。Decon7是一种复合消毒剂,目前用于食品和农业、医疗设施和其他行业。虽然Decon7已被证明可以灭活多种病原体并破坏生物膜,但其对冠状病毒的灭活效果和速度尚未得到评估。目的:评价Decon7对冠状病毒的灭活效果和灭活率。方法:将3种冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2、HCoV OC43和HCoV NL63)分别接种到16种环境表面材料上,对稀释比例为1:4的Decon7和稀释比例为1:10的漂白剂进行消毒效果评价。结果:用1:4稀释的Decon7使所有表面上的所有冠状病毒灭活,接触时间为1分钟。1:10稀释的漂白剂在所有表面接触时间为1分钟时不能有效灭活冠状病毒。结论:新技术和新化学物质可以更有效地灭活环境表面上的病原体。这些消毒方法和材料需要不到10分钟的接触时间,可以提高清洁和消毒建筑环境中表面的功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The reality of patient bodily waste management: Nurse perceptions of current practice & staff safety Facilitators and barriers for high-reliability training in medical centers Quality of care and emergency department throughput during the COVID-19 pandemic in a community health system Pandemic in a Community Health System Comparison of nursing staffing ratio in selected safety net and non-safety net hospitals in the United States Challenges and opportunities in achieving secure hospital clinical mobility management: An illustrative use case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1