Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Gingival Crevicular Blood with Finger Capillary Blood and Venous Capillary Blood to Assess Blood Glucose Levels for Screening of Diabetes Mellitus in Chronic Periodontits Patients: A Cross-sectional Study

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.7860/jcdr/2023/59578.17223
Chandni Patel, V. Shah, B. Dave, Sapan Patel, S. Gajjar, Tanvi Hirani, G. Girdhar, Surabhi Joshi
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Gingival Crevicular Blood with Finger Capillary Blood and Venous Capillary Blood to Assess Blood Glucose Levels for Screening of Diabetes Mellitus in Chronic Periodontits Patients: A Cross-sectional Study","authors":"Chandni Patel, V. Shah, B. Dave, Sapan Patel, S. Gajjar, Tanvi Hirani, G. Girdhar, Surabhi Joshi","doi":"10.7860/jcdr/2023/59578.17223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Diabetes mellitus is defined as a clinically and genetically diverse cluster of illnesses involving conflict in carbohydrate and protein metabolism. Periodontitis is a complex condition with several causes. The interaction between these two conditions appears to be cyclical as well as bidirectional. Gingival crevicular blood obtained through routine periodontal oral assessment could be utilised for blood glucose estimation. Aim: To examine the efficacy of gingival crevicular blood elicited during routine periodontal probing as a reliable source for screening of diabetes mellitus, and to compare it with finger capillary blood and venous capillary blood in chronic periodontitis patients. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional, in-vivo, clinical study was conducted in the Department of Periodontology at Karnavati School of Dentistry, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India, from January 2021 to January 2022. The study included 50 patients, who were diagnosed with chronic periodontitis in the age range ≥30 years, and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A prior detailed history was compiled. The clinical parameters recorded were sulcus bleeding index, plaque index, gingival index, probing pocket depth, and clinical attachment level. Each patient’s blood samples were collected from three different sites, Gingival Crevicular Blood (GCB) collected from gingival crevice, Finger Capillary Blood (FCB) collected from finger bed and and Venous Capillary Blood (VCB) collected from forearm for determining the blood glucose levels. Glucose levels were compared by oneway Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Karl Pearson’s correlation was used for the comparison. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0 was used for statistical analysis and p-value ≤0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: The mean Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) and Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) was 5.5±0.61 mm and 6.76±0.82 mm, respectively. The mean Plaque Index (PI) and Gingival Index (GI) score was 1.41±0.25 and 1.45±0.21, respectively. The mean GCB, FCB, and VCB glucose level of the subjects were 171.58±85.63 mg/dL, 179.14 ±80.31 mg/dL and 186.96±87.57 mg/dL, respectively. There was no statistical difference seen among the three methods thus, either of the methods can be used for measuring blood glucose levels for screening of diabetes mellitus in chronic periodontitis patients (p-value= 0.66). Posistive correlation between FCB and VCB (r-value=0.976, p-value<0.001). VCB and GCB when correlated showed strong positive and highly statistically significant results (r-value= 0.934, p-value<0.001). Similarly, GCB and FCB showed a positive correlation (r-value=0.920, p-value<0.001) which was statistically highly significant. Conclusion: The results suggested that the efficacy of gingival crevicular blood when compared with finger capillary blood and venous capillary blood glucose levels showed positive correlation, suggesting either can be used in dental clinics for diabetic screening purpose without any extra invasive procedures.","PeriodicalId":15483,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2023/59578.17223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetes mellitus is defined as a clinically and genetically diverse cluster of illnesses involving conflict in carbohydrate and protein metabolism. Periodontitis is a complex condition with several causes. The interaction between these two conditions appears to be cyclical as well as bidirectional. Gingival crevicular blood obtained through routine periodontal oral assessment could be utilised for blood glucose estimation. Aim: To examine the efficacy of gingival crevicular blood elicited during routine periodontal probing as a reliable source for screening of diabetes mellitus, and to compare it with finger capillary blood and venous capillary blood in chronic periodontitis patients. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional, in-vivo, clinical study was conducted in the Department of Periodontology at Karnavati School of Dentistry, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India, from January 2021 to January 2022. The study included 50 patients, who were diagnosed with chronic periodontitis in the age range ≥30 years, and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A prior detailed history was compiled. The clinical parameters recorded were sulcus bleeding index, plaque index, gingival index, probing pocket depth, and clinical attachment level. Each patient’s blood samples were collected from three different sites, Gingival Crevicular Blood (GCB) collected from gingival crevice, Finger Capillary Blood (FCB) collected from finger bed and and Venous Capillary Blood (VCB) collected from forearm for determining the blood glucose levels. Glucose levels were compared by oneway Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Karl Pearson’s correlation was used for the comparison. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0 was used for statistical analysis and p-value ≤0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: The mean Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) and Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) was 5.5±0.61 mm and 6.76±0.82 mm, respectively. The mean Plaque Index (PI) and Gingival Index (GI) score was 1.41±0.25 and 1.45±0.21, respectively. The mean GCB, FCB, and VCB glucose level of the subjects were 171.58±85.63 mg/dL, 179.14 ±80.31 mg/dL and 186.96±87.57 mg/dL, respectively. There was no statistical difference seen among the three methods thus, either of the methods can be used for measuring blood glucose levels for screening of diabetes mellitus in chronic periodontitis patients (p-value= 0.66). Posistive correlation between FCB and VCB (r-value=0.976, p-value<0.001). VCB and GCB when correlated showed strong positive and highly statistically significant results (r-value= 0.934, p-value<0.001). Similarly, GCB and FCB showed a positive correlation (r-value=0.920, p-value<0.001) which was statistically highly significant. Conclusion: The results suggested that the efficacy of gingival crevicular blood when compared with finger capillary blood and venous capillary blood glucose levels showed positive correlation, suggesting either can be used in dental clinics for diabetic screening purpose without any extra invasive procedures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
龈沟血与手指毛细血管血和静脉毛细血管血对慢性牙周炎患者血糖水平筛查效果的对比评价:一项横断面研究
简介:糖尿病是一种临床上和遗传上多样化的疾病,涉及碳水化合物和蛋白质代谢的冲突。牙周炎是一种复杂的疾病,有多种原因。这两种情况之间的相互作用似乎是周期性的,也是双向的。通过常规牙周口腔检查获得的龈沟血可用于血糖测定。目的:探讨常规牙周探诊龈沟血作为糖尿病筛查的可靠来源,并与慢性牙周炎患者手指毛细血管血和静脉毛细血管血进行比较。材料和方法:这项横断面体内临床研究于2021年1月至2022年1月在印度古吉拉特邦甘地纳加尔卡尔纳瓦蒂牙科学院牙周病科进行。本研究纳入年龄≥30岁、诊断为慢性牙周炎的患者50例,符合纳入和排除标准。先前的详细历史已编制。记录临床参数为龈沟出血指数、菌斑指数、牙龈指数、探诊袋深度、临床附着水平。每位患者的血液采集于三个不同部位,龈缝采集龈沟血(GCB),指床采集手指毛细血管血(FCB),前臂采集静脉毛细血管血(VCB),用于测定血糖水平。葡萄糖水平通过单因素方差分析(ANOVA)进行比较。卡尔·皮尔森的相关性被用于比较。采用SPSS 26.0版本进行统计分析,以p值≤0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:平均探查袋深度(PPD)为5.5±0.61 mm,临床附着水平(CAL)为6.76±0.82 mm。牙菌斑指数(PI)和牙龈指数(GI)的平均值分别为1.41±0.25和1.45±0.21。受试者的GCB、FCB和VCB平均葡萄糖水平分别为171.58±85.63 mg/dL、179.14±80.31 mg/dL和186.96±87.57 mg/dL。三种方法间无统计学差异,两种方法均可用于慢性牙周炎患者血糖水平的检测,p值为0.66。FCB与VCB呈正相关(r值=0.976,p值<0.001)。VCB与GCB相关时呈强正相关,且具有高度统计学意义(r值= 0.934,p值<0.001)。同样,GCB与FCB呈正相关(r值=0.920,p值<0.001),具有高度统计学意义。结论:龈沟血与手指毛细血管血及静脉毛细血管血糖水平呈显著正相关,提示两者均可用于牙科临床糖尿病筛查,无需额外的侵入性操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
761
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Specialties Covered: Anaesthesia, Anatomy, Animal Research, Biochemistry, Biotechnology, Cardiology, Community, Dermatology, Dentistry, Education, Emergency Medicine, Endocrinology, Ethics, Ear Nose and Throat, Forensic, Gastroenterology, Genetics, Haematology, Health Management and Policy, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Intensive Care, Internal Medicine, Microbiology, Health Management and Policy, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Intensive Care, Internal Medicine, Microbiology, Nephrology / Renal, Neurology and Neuro-Surgery, Nutrition, Nursing/Midwifery, Oncology, Orthopaedics, Ophthalmology, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Paediatrics and Neonatology Pharmacology, Physiology, Pathology, Plastic Surgery, Psychiatry/Mental Health, Rehabilitation / Physiotherapy, Radiology, Statistics, Surgery, Speech and Hearing (Audiology)
期刊最新文献
Correction. Correction. Correction. Correction. Mental Health of Foreign Medical Graduates in Tamil Nadu, India: A Mixed-methods Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1