Allergic contact dermatitis from mercury antiseptics and derivatives: Study protocol of tolerance to intramuscular injections of thimerosal

Mar[iacute]a Teresa Audicana, Daniel Mu[ntilde]oz, Mar[iacute]a Dolores del Pozo, Eduardo Fern[aacute]ndez, Gabriel Gastaminza, Luiz Fern[aacute]ndez de Corres
{"title":"Allergic contact dermatitis from mercury antiseptics and derivatives: Study protocol of tolerance to intramuscular injections of thimerosal","authors":"Mar[iacute]a Teresa Audicana,&nbsp;Daniel Mu[ntilde]oz,&nbsp;Mar[iacute]a Dolores del Pozo,&nbsp;Eduardo Fern[aacute]ndez,&nbsp;Gabriel Gastaminza,&nbsp;Luiz Fern[aacute]ndez de Corres","doi":"10.1053/ajcd.2002.29945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Background:</strong> Mercury derivatives are frequent contact allergens and their cross-reactivity is not constant. Thimerosal is an organic mercurial used as an antiseptic and as a preservative in most vaccines. <strong>Objective:</strong> To evaluate cross-reactivity, exposure factors, and tolerance to vaccines containing thimerosal in patients sensitized to mercury derivatives. <strong>Methods:</strong> Design: Observational study (cross-sectional); Patients: 125 patients were recruited for the study, 72 women and girls and 53 boys and men, average age 18.7 years old, range 3 to 65, with positive patch tests to mercury derivatives and/or thimerosal; Interventions: All patients were studied by means of enquiry, patch tests, intradermal tests, and intramuscular challenge with thimerosal. <strong>Results:</strong> A sensitization to thimerosal was observed in 57 patients. Twenty-four of these 125 patients presented a positive intradermal reaction. Ammoniated mercury seems to be a good marker of mercury sensitization eliciting positive reaction in 78% of all patients and merbromin in 66%. In most cases, (100/125) cross-reactivity was found among mercury derivatives. The intramuscular injection of thimerosal induced a mild local reaction in only 5 patients (4% of the total, 9% of thimerosal positive reactions). Childhood vaccinations, merbromin used as an antiseptic, broken thermometers, and the use of drops were the main sources of exposure. <strong>Conclusions:</strong> The majority of the patients showed positive tests to both organic and inorganic mercury derivatives. Vaccination with thimerosal is relatively safe, even for individuals with delayed type hypersensitivity to this chemical, since more than 90% of allergic patients tolerated intramuscular challenge tests with thimerosal. A simplified protocol of patch tests to study mercury derivatives is proposed. It would be advisable to restrict the use of mercurial antiseptics and mercury thermometers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7653,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Contact Dermatitis","volume":"13 1","pages":"Pages 3-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1053/ajcd.2002.29945","citationCount":"54","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Contact Dermatitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1046199X02450075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

Abstract

Background: Mercury derivatives are frequent contact allergens and their cross-reactivity is not constant. Thimerosal is an organic mercurial used as an antiseptic and as a preservative in most vaccines. Objective: To evaluate cross-reactivity, exposure factors, and tolerance to vaccines containing thimerosal in patients sensitized to mercury derivatives. Methods: Design: Observational study (cross-sectional); Patients: 125 patients were recruited for the study, 72 women and girls and 53 boys and men, average age 18.7 years old, range 3 to 65, with positive patch tests to mercury derivatives and/or thimerosal; Interventions: All patients were studied by means of enquiry, patch tests, intradermal tests, and intramuscular challenge with thimerosal. Results: A sensitization to thimerosal was observed in 57 patients. Twenty-four of these 125 patients presented a positive intradermal reaction. Ammoniated mercury seems to be a good marker of mercury sensitization eliciting positive reaction in 78% of all patients and merbromin in 66%. In most cases, (100/125) cross-reactivity was found among mercury derivatives. The intramuscular injection of thimerosal induced a mild local reaction in only 5 patients (4% of the total, 9% of thimerosal positive reactions). Childhood vaccinations, merbromin used as an antiseptic, broken thermometers, and the use of drops were the main sources of exposure. Conclusions: The majority of the patients showed positive tests to both organic and inorganic mercury derivatives. Vaccination with thimerosal is relatively safe, even for individuals with delayed type hypersensitivity to this chemical, since more than 90% of allergic patients tolerated intramuscular challenge tests with thimerosal. A simplified protocol of patch tests to study mercury derivatives is proposed. It would be advisable to restrict the use of mercurial antiseptics and mercury thermometers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
汞防腐剂及其衍生物引起的过敏性接触性皮炎:对肌内注射硫柳汞的耐受性研究方案
背景:汞衍生物是常见的接触性过敏原,其交叉反应性不是恒定的。硫柳汞是一种有机汞,在大多数疫苗中用作防腐剂和防腐剂。目的:评价汞衍生物致敏患者对含硫柳汞疫苗的交叉反应性、暴露因素和耐受性。设计:观察性研究(横断面);患者:研究招募了125名患者,72名女性和女孩,53名男性和男孩,平均年龄18.7岁,年龄范围3至65岁,对汞衍生物和/或硫柳汞的斑贴试验呈阳性;干预措施:通过询问、贴片试验、皮内试验和肌内注射硫柳汞对所有患者进行研究。结果:57例患者出现硫柳汞致敏。125例患者中有24例出现皮内阳性反应。氨化汞似乎是一个很好的汞致敏标志物,在所有患者中引起78%的阳性反应,在所有患者中引起66%的阳性反应。在大多数情况下,汞衍生物之间存在(100/125)交叉反应性。肌注硫柳汞仅在5例患者中引起轻度局部反应(占总数的4%,9%的硫柳汞阳性反应)。儿童接种疫苗、作为防腐剂使用的汞溴、破损的温度计和使用滴剂是主要的接触源。结论:大多数患者对有机和无机汞衍生物的检测均呈阳性。硫柳汞疫苗接种是相对安全的,即使对这种化学物质有延迟型超敏反应的个体也是如此,因为90%以上的过敏患者耐受用硫柳汞进行肌肉注射试验。提出了一种简化的斑贴试验方案来研究汞衍生物。建议限制使用含汞防腐剂和汞温度计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ALLERGIC CONTACT DERMATITIS OF THE FEET LONG-TERM STUDY ON PRIMARY PREVENTION OF IRRITANT CONTACT DERMATITIS A REVIEW OF PATCH TESTING WITH PRESERVATIVES AT ST. JOHNʼS INSTITUTE OF DERMATOLOGY FROM 1995 TO 2000 CONTACT ALLERGY TO METAL AND TOTAL JOINT ARTHROPLASTY QUALITY OF LIFE ANALYSIS IN PATIENTS WITH HAND DERMATITIS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1