Evaluation of Fingerprint Selection Algorithms for Local Text Reuse Detection

IF 0.5 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS Applied Computer Systems Pub Date : 2020-05-01 DOI:10.2478/acss-2020-0002
Gints Jēkabsons
{"title":"Evaluation of Fingerprint Selection Algorithms for Local Text Reuse Detection","authors":"Gints Jēkabsons","doi":"10.2478/acss-2020-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Detection of local text reuse is central to a variety of applications, including plagiarism detection, origin detection, and information flow analysis. This paper evaluates and compares effectiveness of fingerprint selection algorithms for the source retrieval stage of local text reuse detection. In total, six algorithms are compared – Every p-th, 0 mod p, Winnowing, Hailstorm, Frequency-biased Winnowing (FBW), as well as the proposed modified version of FBW (MFBW). Most of the previously published studies in local text reuse detection are based on datasets having either artificially generated, long-sized, or unobfuscated text reuse. In this study, to evaluate performance of the algorithms, a new dataset has been built containing real text reuse cases from Bachelor and Master Theses (written in English in the field of computer science) where about half of the cases involve less than 1 % of document text while about two-thirds of the cases involve paraphrasing. In the performed experiments, the overall best detection quality is reached by Winnowing, 0 mod p, and MFBW. The proposed MFBW algorithm is a considerable improvement over FBW and becomes one of the best performing algorithms. The software developed for this study is freely available at the author’s website http://www.cs.rtu.lv/jekabsons/.","PeriodicalId":41960,"journal":{"name":"Applied Computer Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Computer Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/acss-2020-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Detection of local text reuse is central to a variety of applications, including plagiarism detection, origin detection, and information flow analysis. This paper evaluates and compares effectiveness of fingerprint selection algorithms for the source retrieval stage of local text reuse detection. In total, six algorithms are compared – Every p-th, 0 mod p, Winnowing, Hailstorm, Frequency-biased Winnowing (FBW), as well as the proposed modified version of FBW (MFBW). Most of the previously published studies in local text reuse detection are based on datasets having either artificially generated, long-sized, or unobfuscated text reuse. In this study, to evaluate performance of the algorithms, a new dataset has been built containing real text reuse cases from Bachelor and Master Theses (written in English in the field of computer science) where about half of the cases involve less than 1 % of document text while about two-thirds of the cases involve paraphrasing. In the performed experiments, the overall best detection quality is reached by Winnowing, 0 mod p, and MFBW. The proposed MFBW algorithm is a considerable improvement over FBW and becomes one of the best performing algorithms. The software developed for this study is freely available at the author’s website http://www.cs.rtu.lv/jekabsons/.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部文本重用检测中指纹选择算法的评价
摘要本地文本重用检测是文本剽窃检测、文本来源检测和信息流分析等应用的核心。本文对指纹选择算法在局部文本重用检测的源检索阶段的有效性进行了评价和比较。总共比较了六种算法——每p次、0模p、Winnowing、Hailstorm、Frequency-biased Winnowing (FBW),以及提出的FBW修正版本(MFBW)。以前发表的大多数关于本地文本重用检测的研究都是基于人工生成的、长尺寸的或未混淆的文本重用的数据集。在本研究中,为了评估算法的性能,建立了一个新的数据集,其中包含来自学士和硕士论文(在计算机科学领域用英语撰写)的真实文本重用案例,其中约一半的案例涉及不到1%的文档文本,而约三分之二的案例涉及释义。在所进行的实验中,Winnowing、0 mod p和MFBW的检测质量总体最佳。本文提出的MFBW算法比FBW算法有了很大的改进,成为性能最好的算法之一。为这项研究开发的软件可以在作者的网站http://www.cs.rtu.lv/jekabsons/上免费获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Computer Systems
Applied Computer Systems COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS-
自引率
10.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Multimodal Biometric System Based on the Fusion in Score of Fingerprint and Online Handwritten Signature Multichannel Approach for Sentiment Analysis Using Stack of Neural Network with Lexicon Based Padding and Attention Mechanism BRS-based Model for the Specification of Multi-view Point Ontology Empirical Analysis of Supervised and Unsupervised Machine Learning Algorithms with Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis Approximate Nearest Neighbour-based Index Tree: A Case Study for Instrumental Music Search
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1