The relationship between perception and assimilation of audio information depending on the methods of fixing writing in the era of digitalization

A. V. Eliseeva, E. Strelchuk
{"title":"The relationship between perception and assimilation of audio information depending on the methods of fixing writing in the era of digitalization","authors":"A. V. Eliseeva, E. Strelchuk","doi":"10.15293/2658-6762.2204.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The article explores a significant problem of the relationship between writing and listening depending on the methods of symbolic text fixation in the digital age. The purpose of the study is to identify differences in the perception and assimilation of audio information, which is fixed in two different ways: by hand and typing on the keyboard of a computer (tablet). Materials and Methods. The experimental study was conducted at the combined arms Academy in the «Standards of Speech\" classroom using a specially developed author's inventory. The study sample consisted of 1st and 2nd year master’s students (n = 50) aged between 25 and 40 years, divided into two equal groups of 25 people. The first subgroup included those who chose to fix the text by hand, whereas the second subgroup included participants who chose to fix the text on a computer. The experiment consisted of two parts: it was necessary to record the auditable text in writing (by hand or on a computer) and answer questions after its perception. The total time was 90 minutes. The reliability of the data obtained was verified using the Student's t-test calculation method for two independent samples. Results. In the course of the study, it was determined that for fixing the audited text, listeners (if desired) use two different methods: note-taking and computer shorthand. Analysis of the results of sign-symbolic fixation of the audited text showed significant differences in the structural organization of the written text. It was revealed that, in contrast to computer shorthand, the use of taking notes significantly increases the efficiency of assimilation of educational material. Conclusions. The article concludes that methods of sign-symbolic fixation of a written text in different ways affect the perception of audio information and its further assimilation, which in turn has a significant impact on the development of thinking and memory.","PeriodicalId":21621,"journal":{"name":"Science for Education Today","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science for Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2204.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The article explores a significant problem of the relationship between writing and listening depending on the methods of symbolic text fixation in the digital age. The purpose of the study is to identify differences in the perception and assimilation of audio information, which is fixed in two different ways: by hand and typing on the keyboard of a computer (tablet). Materials and Methods. The experimental study was conducted at the combined arms Academy in the «Standards of Speech" classroom using a specially developed author's inventory. The study sample consisted of 1st and 2nd year master’s students (n = 50) aged between 25 and 40 years, divided into two equal groups of 25 people. The first subgroup included those who chose to fix the text by hand, whereas the second subgroup included participants who chose to fix the text on a computer. The experiment consisted of two parts: it was necessary to record the auditable text in writing (by hand or on a computer) and answer questions after its perception. The total time was 90 minutes. The reliability of the data obtained was verified using the Student's t-test calculation method for two independent samples. Results. In the course of the study, it was determined that for fixing the audited text, listeners (if desired) use two different methods: note-taking and computer shorthand. Analysis of the results of sign-symbolic fixation of the audited text showed significant differences in the structural organization of the written text. It was revealed that, in contrast to computer shorthand, the use of taking notes significantly increases the efficiency of assimilation of educational material. Conclusions. The article concludes that methods of sign-symbolic fixation of a written text in different ways affect the perception of audio information and its further assimilation, which in turn has a significant impact on the development of thinking and memory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字化时代语音信息感知与同化的关系——基于文字固定方式
介绍。本文从数字时代的符号文本固定方法出发,探讨了写与听的关系问题。本研究的目的是识别音频信息的感知和同化的差异,音频信息以两种不同的方式固定:通过手和在电脑(平板电脑)键盘上打字。材料与方法。实验研究是在联合学院的《言语标准》课堂上进行的,使用了专门开发的作者清单。研究样本包括一年级和二年级的硕士生(n = 50),年龄在25至40岁之间,分为两组,每组25人。第一个小组包括那些选择手工修改文本的人,而第二个小组包括那些选择在电脑上修改文本的参与者。实验包括两个部分:必须以书面形式(手写或在电脑上)记录可审计的文本,并在感知后回答问题。总时间是90分钟。采用两个独立样本的Student's t检验计算方法验证所得数据的可靠性。结果。在研究过程中,确定听众(如果愿意的话)使用两种不同的方法来修改审计文本:记笔记和电脑速记。对审计文本的符号-符号固定结果的分析显示,书面文本的结构组织存在显著差异。据透露,与电脑速记相比,使用笔记大大提高了对教育材料的吸收效率。结论。本文认为,文字文本中不同的符号-符号固定方式会影响语音信息的感知和进一步的同化,进而对思维和记忆的发展产生重要影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Objective assessment of learning outcomes: Peculiarities of design and application of assessment tools in modern conditions of digital development Evaluating the functions of the teacher-producer for preparing prospective economists in the modern context of education system digitalization Professional education as a way to discover the multi-dimensional integrity of a human Research into the capacities of the global digital environment for obtaining cultural and conceptual information at institutional and individual levels Actor-network interpretation of phenomena and current issues of education: The historicist grounds and specificity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1