The Effects of Quran Recitation on Sedation and Pain in Children

IF 0.5 Q4 PEDIATRICS Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care Pub Date : 2022-11-12 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1760632
H. Çaksen
{"title":"The Effects of Quran Recitation on Sedation and Pain in Children","authors":"H. Çaksen","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1760632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Optimizing the comfort of pediatric patients during a critical illness is an essential facet of day-to-day care in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Optimum delivery of comfort in the complex ecosystem of the PICU remains elusive. A great deal has been published on (1) standardizing measures of comfort; (2) the best non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies to use; (3) the best way to deliver these therapies; and (4) how to ensure quick and appropriate responses to changes in a patient’s comfort level.1 Analgesia-based, multimodal sedative approaches are the foundation for comfort, whereby pain is addressed first and then sedation titrated to a predefined target based on the goals of care.1 Non-pharmacological interventions can reduce the total requirement and associated side effects of sedation and analgesia medications and have been recommended by international sedation guidelines in PICU.2 For example, use of musical intervention has beneficial effects on the level of sedation in children admitted to PICU.3,4 The majority of parents thought that music therapy helped their child to communicate (89%), feel less isolated (100%) copewith stress during hospitalization (100%), contributed to physical recovery (90%), and alleviated feelings of anxiety (90%).5 A metaanalysis showed that music intervention significantly decreased the pain levels, both in the newborn group and in the infant/children group. Music intervention significantly reduced heart rate and respiratory rate and increased peripheral capillary oxygen saturation. In subgroup analyses of types of pain, music intervention had significant effects on prick pain, chronic and procedural pain, and postoperative pain.6 Herein we discussed the effects of Quran recitation, a non-pharmacological intervention, on sedation and pain in children followed in intensive care unit to attract attention to the fact that the Quran is not only a book containing religious teachings, but also a Shifa (healing) book. Parents exhibit different attitudes toward their children’s pain. Mariyana et al7 defined eight themes in managing the pain of childrenwith cancer during palliative care as follows: the dimensions of pain experienced by children undergoing palliative care; mothers’ physical and psychological responses; mothers’ emotional responses; barriers encountered by mothers when taking care of their child at home; mothers’ interventions to reduce their child’s pain; mothers’ efforts to distract their child from pain; giving encouragement when the child is in pain; and mothers’ efforts and prayers to make their child comfortable.7 In another study, six themes related to parents’ attitudes toward their children’s pain were reported as follows: pain can and should be managed; Allah’s will; parent’s worst pain was emotional pain due to child’s diagnosis; belief that their presence could ameliorate their child’s pain; desire for shared decision making; and the child’s responsibility to express pain. In this series, some parents expressed the belief that pain and suffering were from Allah and described pain as “a test from Allah” and that “everything from Allah is good.” The parents believed that praying and reading the Qur’an could reduce the child’s pain, and they also wanted the pain to be treated with medication.8 Lim et al9 noted that the Christian and Muslim parents achieved a sense of assurance from their religious beliefs and practice in managing their children’s postoperative pain. Farrag et al10 studied non-pharmacological strategies including “rewarding a child for his brave behaviors,” “steps in the sky,” “frog breathing,” and “listen Holy Quran” among children on dialysis. Quran listening was the most effective","PeriodicalId":44426,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1760632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optimizing the comfort of pediatric patients during a critical illness is an essential facet of day-to-day care in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Optimum delivery of comfort in the complex ecosystem of the PICU remains elusive. A great deal has been published on (1) standardizing measures of comfort; (2) the best non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies to use; (3) the best way to deliver these therapies; and (4) how to ensure quick and appropriate responses to changes in a patient’s comfort level.1 Analgesia-based, multimodal sedative approaches are the foundation for comfort, whereby pain is addressed first and then sedation titrated to a predefined target based on the goals of care.1 Non-pharmacological interventions can reduce the total requirement and associated side effects of sedation and analgesia medications and have been recommended by international sedation guidelines in PICU.2 For example, use of musical intervention has beneficial effects on the level of sedation in children admitted to PICU.3,4 The majority of parents thought that music therapy helped their child to communicate (89%), feel less isolated (100%) copewith stress during hospitalization (100%), contributed to physical recovery (90%), and alleviated feelings of anxiety (90%).5 A metaanalysis showed that music intervention significantly decreased the pain levels, both in the newborn group and in the infant/children group. Music intervention significantly reduced heart rate and respiratory rate and increased peripheral capillary oxygen saturation. In subgroup analyses of types of pain, music intervention had significant effects on prick pain, chronic and procedural pain, and postoperative pain.6 Herein we discussed the effects of Quran recitation, a non-pharmacological intervention, on sedation and pain in children followed in intensive care unit to attract attention to the fact that the Quran is not only a book containing religious teachings, but also a Shifa (healing) book. Parents exhibit different attitudes toward their children’s pain. Mariyana et al7 defined eight themes in managing the pain of childrenwith cancer during palliative care as follows: the dimensions of pain experienced by children undergoing palliative care; mothers’ physical and psychological responses; mothers’ emotional responses; barriers encountered by mothers when taking care of their child at home; mothers’ interventions to reduce their child’s pain; mothers’ efforts to distract their child from pain; giving encouragement when the child is in pain; and mothers’ efforts and prayers to make their child comfortable.7 In another study, six themes related to parents’ attitudes toward their children’s pain were reported as follows: pain can and should be managed; Allah’s will; parent’s worst pain was emotional pain due to child’s diagnosis; belief that their presence could ameliorate their child’s pain; desire for shared decision making; and the child’s responsibility to express pain. In this series, some parents expressed the belief that pain and suffering were from Allah and described pain as “a test from Allah” and that “everything from Allah is good.” The parents believed that praying and reading the Qur’an could reduce the child’s pain, and they also wanted the pain to be treated with medication.8 Lim et al9 noted that the Christian and Muslim parents achieved a sense of assurance from their religious beliefs and practice in managing their children’s postoperative pain. Farrag et al10 studied non-pharmacological strategies including “rewarding a child for his brave behaviors,” “steps in the sky,” “frog breathing,” and “listen Holy Quran” among children on dialysis. Quran listening was the most effective
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诵读古兰经对儿童镇静和疼痛的影响
优化儿科患者在危重疾病期间的舒适度是儿科重症监护病房(PICU)日常护理的一个重要方面。在PICU复杂的生态系统中提供最佳的舒适度仍然是难以捉摸的。关于(1)标准化舒适度的措施已经发表了大量的文章;(2)非药物治疗和药物治疗的最佳选择;(3)提供这些治疗的最佳途径;(4)如何确保对患者舒适度的变化做出快速而适当的反应以镇痛为基础的多模式镇静方法是舒适的基础,首先解决疼痛,然后根据护理目标将镇静滴定到预定义的目标1非药物干预可以减少镇静和镇痛药物的总需求和相关副作用,并已被国际镇静指南推荐用于PICU.2,例如,使用音乐干预对picu入院儿童的镇静水平有有益的影响。大多数家长认为音乐治疗有助于他们的孩子沟通(89%),感觉较少孤立(100%),应对住院期间的压力(100%)。有助于身体恢复(90%),减轻焦虑感(90%)一项荟萃分析显示,音乐干预显著降低了新生儿组和婴儿/儿童组的疼痛水平。音乐干预显著降低心率和呼吸频率,增加外周毛细血管血氧饱和度。在疼痛类型的亚组分析中,音乐干预对针刺痛、慢性、程序性疼痛和术后疼痛有显著的影响在这里,我们讨论了诵读《古兰经》(一种非药物干预)对重症监护病房儿童镇静和疼痛的影响,以引起人们注意《古兰经》不仅是一本包含宗教教义的书,也是一本Shifa(治疗)书。父母对孩子的痛苦表现出不同的态度。Mariyana等人7定义了姑息治疗期间管理癌症儿童疼痛的八个主题:接受姑息治疗的儿童所经历的疼痛维度;母亲的生理和心理反应;母亲的情绪反应;母亲在家照顾孩子时遇到的障碍;母亲减少孩子痛苦的干预措施;母亲们努力分散孩子对痛苦的注意力;在孩子痛苦时给予鼓励;母亲们的努力和祈祷使她们的孩子感到舒适在另一项研究中,与父母对孩子疼痛的态度相关的六个主题被报道如下:疼痛可以而且应该得到控制;真主的意志;父母最大的痛苦是孩子的诊断带来的情感上的痛苦;相信他们的存在可以减轻孩子的痛苦;共同决策的愿望;以及孩子表达痛苦的责任。在这个系列中,一些家长表示相信痛苦和磨难是来自真主的,并将痛苦描述为“来自真主的考验”,“来自真主的一切都是好的”。父母认为祈祷和阅读古兰经可以减轻孩子的痛苦,他们也希望用药物治疗疼痛Lim等人注意到,基督徒和穆斯林父母从他们的宗教信仰和处理孩子术后疼痛的实践中获得了一种安全感。Farrag等人研究了透析儿童的非药物策略,包括“奖励孩子的勇敢行为”、“在天空中行走”、“青蛙呼吸”和“听《古兰经》”。听《古兰经》是最有效的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
14.30%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
Harms Associated with Tracheal Reintubation After Unplanned Extubation: A Retrospective Cohort Study Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Scores in Children who Received Early Life Mechanical Ventilation in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit “It Would Be All-Consuming”: Community Parents' Perceptions of the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Rescue Therapy in Pediatric Bupropion Cardiotoxicity Social Disadvantage and Inequity in Access to Pediatric Critical Care Services for Children Living Remote from a Children's Hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1