Punk Activism and Its Repression in China and Indonesia: Decolonizing "Global Punk"

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 CULTURAL STUDIES Cultural Critique Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1353/cul.2022.0036
Jian Xiao, Jimmy Donaghey
{"title":"Punk Activism and Its Repression in China and Indonesia: Decolonizing \"Global Punk\"","authors":"Jian Xiao, Jimmy Donaghey","doi":"10.1353/cul.2022.0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Punk's global spread has been a defining aspect of its forty-plus year history; contemporary punk can only be understood in relation to this global punk network. Punk's transmission from place to place is shaped by neocolonial cultural flows, but punk scenes also respond to their particular contexts, and analysis of local punk scenes must consider this contextuality carefully alongside a \"global punk\" framing. \"Other\" punk places cannot be simply judged via a reductive neocolonial imposition of Anglo-American punk norms—an \"inter Asia\" comparison of the punk scenes of China and Indonesia is an example of this critical decentering and acts as a decolonizing intervention into \"global punk.\" Punks embrace this \"global punk\" network and are acutely conscious of its contours—it is only in the repression of these punk communities (or in some academic circles) that the \"cultural imperialist\" framing is maintained, with punk in Indonesia and China dismissed by the authorities (or scholars) as Western imports. This article briefly traces the histories of punk's emergence in China and Indonesia, in the years leading up to, and following, transitional periods of their authoritarian regimes through the very late 1980s and 1990s, discusses and compares contemporary forms of punk resistance and activism in each place, including DIY cultural production and manifestations of \"punk space\" in Indonesia and China, before highlighting repression from state and para-state institutions in these now \"post-authoritarian\" and \"softened authoritarian\" contexts.Cross-comparative study of these places sheds critical light on the experiences of punk there, especially with regard to punk activism (informed by anarchism) and its repression. While direct interconnections between the punk scenes of China and Indonesia are relatively sparse, this exercise in comparative analysis grounds the locally lived experience of punk in a \"global punk\" framing, which is essential to understanding punk cultural production, activism, and resistance in these \"other\" punk places. This article is based on several periods of ethnographic research by the authors (from 2012 to 2018).","PeriodicalId":46410,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Critique","volume":"65 1","pages":"28 - 63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Critique","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cul.2022.0036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract:Punk's global spread has been a defining aspect of its forty-plus year history; contemporary punk can only be understood in relation to this global punk network. Punk's transmission from place to place is shaped by neocolonial cultural flows, but punk scenes also respond to their particular contexts, and analysis of local punk scenes must consider this contextuality carefully alongside a "global punk" framing. "Other" punk places cannot be simply judged via a reductive neocolonial imposition of Anglo-American punk norms—an "inter Asia" comparison of the punk scenes of China and Indonesia is an example of this critical decentering and acts as a decolonizing intervention into "global punk." Punks embrace this "global punk" network and are acutely conscious of its contours—it is only in the repression of these punk communities (or in some academic circles) that the "cultural imperialist" framing is maintained, with punk in Indonesia and China dismissed by the authorities (or scholars) as Western imports. This article briefly traces the histories of punk's emergence in China and Indonesia, in the years leading up to, and following, transitional periods of their authoritarian regimes through the very late 1980s and 1990s, discusses and compares contemporary forms of punk resistance and activism in each place, including DIY cultural production and manifestations of "punk space" in Indonesia and China, before highlighting repression from state and para-state institutions in these now "post-authoritarian" and "softened authoritarian" contexts.Cross-comparative study of these places sheds critical light on the experiences of punk there, especially with regard to punk activism (informed by anarchism) and its repression. While direct interconnections between the punk scenes of China and Indonesia are relatively sparse, this exercise in comparative analysis grounds the locally lived experience of punk in a "global punk" framing, which is essential to understanding punk cultural production, activism, and resistance in these "other" punk places. This article is based on several periods of ethnographic research by the authors (from 2012 to 2018).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
朋克行动主义及其在中国和印尼的压制:去殖民化的“全球朋克”
摘要:朋克在全球的传播是其四十多年历史的一个重要特征;当代朋克只有与这个全球朋克网络联系起来才能被理解。朋克从一个地方传播到另一个地方是由新殖民主义文化流动塑造的,但朋克场景也会对他们的特定背景做出反应,对当地朋克场景的分析必须在“全球朋克”框架下仔细考虑这种语境。“其他”朋克地区不能简单地通过对英美朋克规范的简化的新殖民主义强加来判断——中国和印度尼西亚朋克场景的“跨亚洲”比较是这种批判性去中心化的一个例子,并作为对“全球朋克”的非殖民化干预。朋克们拥抱这个“全球朋克”网络,并敏锐地意识到它的轮廓——只有在对这些朋克社区(或某些学术界)的压制中,“文化帝国主义”的框架才得以维持,印尼和中国的朋克被当局(或学者)视为西方舶来品。本文简要地追溯了朋克在中国和印度尼西亚的兴起历史,从20世纪80年代末到90年代,在专制政权的过渡时期之前和之后的几年里,讨论和比较了每个地方当代朋克抵抗和行动主义的形式,包括DIY文化生产和“朋克空间”在印度尼西亚和中国的表现。在强调国家和准国家机构在这些“后威权主义”和“软化威权主义”背景下的镇压之前。对这些地方的交叉比较研究揭示了那里的朋克经历,特别是关于朋克激进主义(受无政府主义影响)及其镇压。虽然中国和印度尼西亚的朋克场景之间的直接联系相对较少,但这种比较分析的实践将朋克的本地生活经验置于“全球朋克”框架中,这对于理解这些“其他”朋克地区的朋克文化生产、行动主义和抵抗至关重要。本文基于作者的几个时期的民族志研究(2012年至2018年)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cultural Critique
Cultural Critique Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Cultural Critique provides a forum for international and interdisciplinary explorations of intellectual controversies, trends, and issues in culture, theory, and politics. Emphasizing critique rather than criticism, the journal draws on the diverse and conflictual approaches of Marxism, feminism, psychoanalysis, semiotics, political economy, and hermeneutics to offer readings in society and its transformation.
期刊最新文献
The Haunting Image of the Frozen Jew (in Christian Self-Understanding), the Self-Determining Universality of Human Reason, and Anticipating the Secular-Nation-State: From Hobbes to Kant and Beyond Literature Now and Democracy to Come: Jacques Derrida, Ben Lerner, and Leaving the Atocha Station The Con and the Primal Horde A Political Theology of Interpellation: On Subjection, Individuation, and Becoming Nothing Implicit Possibility: Stupidity and Sport "Without Qualities"
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1