Work of a multidisciplinary team in the control of the prescription of ertapenem

M.V. Gil-Navarro , R. Muñoz-Corte , M. Herrero Romero , M.D. Santos Rubio , E. Cordero Matía , J. Bautista Paloma
{"title":"Work of a multidisciplinary team in the control of the prescription of ertapenem","authors":"M.V. Gil-Navarro ,&nbsp;R. Muñoz-Corte ,&nbsp;M. Herrero Romero ,&nbsp;M.D. Santos Rubio ,&nbsp;E. Cordero Matía ,&nbsp;J. Bautista Paloma","doi":"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70069-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the effectiveness of the intervention of a multidiscipline antimicrobial control group in the correct prescription of Ertapenem.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A 4-month long, prospective study into prescriptions for ertapenem was carried out in a third-level hospital. Assessment into the degree of suitability of each prescription according to the infections commission usage criteria. In the situation where prescriptions were not suitable, recommendations were given and acceptance of this was recorded. The effectiveness of the antimicrobial treatment used was assessed and treatment was considered effective when there was remission of the signs and symptoms of the infection when the treatment was completed. The treatment was considered to have failed when the signs and symptoms of infection persisted or progressed, requiring the addition of another antimicrobial agent, changing antibiotics or the prolongation of the treatment for longer than 2 weeks. Lastly, the differences in the average length of stay and the duration of the antibiotic treatment between groups were analysed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty-eight prescriptions were assessed. The usage criterion was adequate in 48% of cases, with 78% effectiveness in this group. In the cases where the prescription was not adequate, but a change in prescription was accepted, the effectiveness was 92%, with 55.5% of those cases not accepting recommendation for change. The average stay was higher in this last group (P=.07). The duration of the antibiotic treatment in the patients who accepted the change in prescription was significantly less than in those who did not accept it (2 vs 7.4 days, P&lt;.0001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The control of ertapenem prescriptions by a multidisciplinary group was effective.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"33 1","pages":"Pages 48-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70069-3","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508509700693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective

To determine the effectiveness of the intervention of a multidiscipline antimicrobial control group in the correct prescription of Ertapenem.

Method

A 4-month long, prospective study into prescriptions for ertapenem was carried out in a third-level hospital. Assessment into the degree of suitability of each prescription according to the infections commission usage criteria. In the situation where prescriptions were not suitable, recommendations were given and acceptance of this was recorded. The effectiveness of the antimicrobial treatment used was assessed and treatment was considered effective when there was remission of the signs and symptoms of the infection when the treatment was completed. The treatment was considered to have failed when the signs and symptoms of infection persisted or progressed, requiring the addition of another antimicrobial agent, changing antibiotics or the prolongation of the treatment for longer than 2 weeks. Lastly, the differences in the average length of stay and the duration of the antibiotic treatment between groups were analysed.

Results

Forty-eight prescriptions were assessed. The usage criterion was adequate in 48% of cases, with 78% effectiveness in this group. In the cases where the prescription was not adequate, but a change in prescription was accepted, the effectiveness was 92%, with 55.5% of those cases not accepting recommendation for change. The average stay was higher in this last group (P=.07). The duration of the antibiotic treatment in the patients who accepted the change in prescription was significantly less than in those who did not accept it (2 vs 7.4 days, P<.0001).

Conclusions

The control of ertapenem prescriptions by a multidisciplinary group was effective.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多学科团队在厄他培南处方控制中的工作
目的探讨多学科抗菌对照组对厄他培南正确处方的干预效果。方法在某三级医院对厄他培南的处方进行为期4个月的前瞻性研究。根据感染委员会的使用标准对各处方的适宜程度进行评估。在处方不合适的情况下,提出建议并记录接受情况。评估所使用的抗菌素治疗的有效性,当治疗完成后感染的体征和症状缓解时,认为治疗有效。当感染的体征和症状持续或进展,需要添加另一种抗菌剂,更换抗生素或延长治疗时间超过2周时,则认为治疗失败。最后,分析了组间平均住院时间和抗生素治疗持续时间的差异。结果共评价处方48张。使用标准在48%的病例中是适当的,在该组中有78%的有效性。在处方不充分但接受改变处方的情况下,有效性为92%,其中55.5%的病例不接受改变建议。最后一组的平均住院时间更长(P=.07)。接受处方改变的患者的抗生素治疗持续时间明显少于未接受处方改变的患者(2天vs 7.4天,p < 0.01)。结论多学科组对厄他培南处方的控制是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Toxicity Profile and Adherence to the Pharmacotherapeutic Regimen of Gemcitabine–carboplatin in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Simplification of Antiretroviral Therapy: A Good Choice for Our Patients and the Sustainability of Our Health Care System Effectiveness and Use of Linezolid in Hospitalisation Wards Application of the Technology Web 2.0 in a Drug Information Centre Pharmacokinetic Monitoring of Antiepileptic Drugs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1