How Practitioners Perceive Coding Proficiency

Xin Xia, Zhiyuan Wan, Pavneet Singh Kochhar, D. Lo
{"title":"How Practitioners Perceive Coding Proficiency","authors":"Xin Xia, Zhiyuan Wan, Pavneet Singh Kochhar, D. Lo","doi":"10.1109/ICSE.2019.00098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coding proficiency is essential to software practitioners. Unfortunately, our understanding on coding proficiency often translates to vague stereotypes, e.g., \"able to write good code\". The lack of specificity hinders employers from measuring a software engineer's coding proficiency, and software engineers from improving their coding proficiency skills. This raises an important question: what skills matter to improve one's coding proficiency. To answer this question, we perform an empirical study by surveying 340 software practitioners from 33 countries across 5 continents. We first identify 38 coding proficiency skills grouped into nine categories by interviewing 15 developers from three companies. We then ask our survey respondents to rate the level of importance for these skills, and provide rationales of their ratings. Our study highlights a total of 21 important skills that receive an average rating of 4.0 and above (important and very important), along with rationales given by proponents and dissenters. We discuss implications of our findings to researchers, educators, and practitioners.","PeriodicalId":6736,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2019.00098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Coding proficiency is essential to software practitioners. Unfortunately, our understanding on coding proficiency often translates to vague stereotypes, e.g., "able to write good code". The lack of specificity hinders employers from measuring a software engineer's coding proficiency, and software engineers from improving their coding proficiency skills. This raises an important question: what skills matter to improve one's coding proficiency. To answer this question, we perform an empirical study by surveying 340 software practitioners from 33 countries across 5 continents. We first identify 38 coding proficiency skills grouped into nine categories by interviewing 15 developers from three companies. We then ask our survey respondents to rate the level of importance for these skills, and provide rationales of their ratings. Our study highlights a total of 21 important skills that receive an average rating of 4.0 and above (important and very important), along with rationales given by proponents and dissenters. We discuss implications of our findings to researchers, educators, and practitioners.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从业人员如何看待编码熟练程度
精通编码对软件从业者来说是必不可少的。不幸的是,我们对编码熟练程度的理解常常转化为模糊的刻板印象,例如,“能够写出好的代码”。缺乏专用性阻碍了雇主衡量软件工程师的编码熟练程度,也阻碍了软件工程师提高编码熟练程度的技能。这就提出了一个重要的问题:什么技能对提高一个人的编码熟练程度很重要。为了回答这个问题,我们进行了一项实证研究,调查了来自5大洲33个国家的340名软件从业者。我们首先通过采访来自三家公司的15名开发人员,将38种编码熟练程度分为9类。然后,我们要求我们的调查受访者对这些技能的重要性进行评级,并提供他们评级的基本原理。我们的研究强调了21项重要的技能,这些技能的平均评分在4.0以上(重要和非常重要),以及支持者和反对者给出的理由。我们讨论了我们的发现对研究人员、教育工作者和实践者的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
VFix: Value-Flow-Guided Precise Program Repair for Null Pointer Dereferences Search-Based Energy Testing of Android Scalable Approaches for Test Suite Reduction A System Identification Based Oracle for Control-CPS Software Fault Localization Training Binary Classifiers as Data Structure Invariants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1