Optimization variations of valley-river landscape-technical systems of the Right Bank zone of Ukraine

IF 0.4 Q4 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Geology Geography and Geoecology Pub Date : 2022-09-24 DOI:10.15421/112246
O. Lavryk, V. Volovyk, Andrii О. Maksiytov, V. Tsymbaliuk
{"title":"Optimization variations of valley-river landscape-technical systems of the Right Bank zone of Ukraine","authors":"O. Lavryk, V. Volovyk, Andrii О. Maksiytov, V. Tsymbaliuk","doi":"10.15421/112246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nThe aim of the research was to develop areas for optimization of valley-river landscape-technical systems (LTchS) on the example of the model region – the Right Bank of Ukraine. The research was based on the materials of the long-term field observations which were carried out in the context of the studies of F.M. Milkov about anthropogenic landscapes. The use of expeditionary and stationary research techniques made it possible to receive the required material for the development of the optimization options of valley-river landscape-technical systems. Six options/practices for the optimization of valley-river LTchS on the example of the Right Bank zone of Ukraine are suggested. Option A does not envisage a control regain over landscape-technogenic systems (LTS); it can be used locally. Option B1 is directed towards a partial restoration of the previous func- tions of the system and an episodic/occasional control over a technical block of LTS. Option B2 implies a total change of the economic purpose of LTchS with the aim of recreation. Option B3 consists in making a nature reserve of some landscape technogenic systems,in perspective the range/habitat of unique species of flora and fauna can be saved or restored on these territories. The restoration of a landscape-techno-genic system to the «operation» stage with previous functions is achieved when option C1 is used. Option C2 requires substantial capital investments, as it implies the creation of an absolutely new landscape-engineering system. For this option, projects have been developed to restore sections in the valleys of the Sob River (Gaisyn city, Vinnytsia region) and the Hirskyi Tikych River (Buky town, Cherkasy region). A layout of the optimized valley-river LTchS on the territory of the Right Bank of Ukraine was suggest- ed. The conclusion has been made that the use of one of the suggested options will not help improve the condition of all valley-river landscape-technogenic systems of the model region. Each river valley requires an individual approach in which the combination of all the above-mentioned directions will be used. The valley-river landscapes optimized with help of the presented scheme will form the image of nature of a present-day European state which will favour the establishment of the concept of well-balanced development. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":42282,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geology Geography and Geoecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geology Geography and Geoecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15421/112246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the research was to develop areas for optimization of valley-river landscape-technical systems (LTchS) on the example of the model region – the Right Bank of Ukraine. The research was based on the materials of the long-term field observations which were carried out in the context of the studies of F.M. Milkov about anthropogenic landscapes. The use of expeditionary and stationary research techniques made it possible to receive the required material for the development of the optimization options of valley-river landscape-technical systems. Six options/practices for the optimization of valley-river LTchS on the example of the Right Bank zone of Ukraine are suggested. Option A does not envisage a control regain over landscape-technogenic systems (LTS); it can be used locally. Option B1 is directed towards a partial restoration of the previous func- tions of the system and an episodic/occasional control over a technical block of LTS. Option B2 implies a total change of the economic purpose of LTchS with the aim of recreation. Option B3 consists in making a nature reserve of some landscape technogenic systems,in perspective the range/habitat of unique species of flora and fauna can be saved or restored on these territories. The restoration of a landscape-techno-genic system to the «operation» stage with previous functions is achieved when option C1 is used. Option C2 requires substantial capital investments, as it implies the creation of an absolutely new landscape-engineering system. For this option, projects have been developed to restore sections in the valleys of the Sob River (Gaisyn city, Vinnytsia region) and the Hirskyi Tikych River (Buky town, Cherkasy region). A layout of the optimized valley-river LTchS on the territory of the Right Bank of Ukraine was suggest- ed. The conclusion has been made that the use of one of the suggested options will not help improve the condition of all valley-river landscape-technogenic systems of the model region. Each river valley requires an individual approach in which the combination of all the above-mentioned directions will be used. The valley-river landscapes optimized with help of the presented scheme will form the image of nature of a present-day European state which will favour the establishment of the concept of well-balanced development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乌克兰右岸地区河谷-河流景观技术系统的优化变化
研究的目的是以乌克兰右岸为例,开发山谷-河流景观-技术系统(LTchS)优化区域。这项研究是基于长期实地观察的材料,这些材料是在米尔科夫关于人为景观的研究背景下进行的。考察和固定研究技术的使用使得有可能获得开发山谷-河流景观-技术系统优化选项所需的材料。以乌克兰右岸地区为例,提出了六种优化河谷-河流ltch的方案/实践。方案A没有设想重新控制景观技术系统(LTS);它可以在当地使用。方案B1旨在部分恢复系统以前的功能,并对LTS的一个技术块进行偶然/偶尔的控制。选项B2意味着ltch的经济目的完全改变,以娱乐为目的。方案B3包括将一些景观技术系统作为自然保护区,考虑到在这些领土上可以保存或恢复独特的动植物物种的范围/栖息地。当使用选项C1时,将景观-技术生成系统恢复到具有先前功能的“操作”阶段。方案C2需要大量的资本投资,因为它意味着创建一个全新的景观工程系统。对于这一选择,已经制定了恢复Sob河(文尼察地区盖辛市)和Hirskyi Tikych河(切尔卡西地区Buky镇)河谷部分的项目。在乌克兰右岸提出了优化的河谷-河流LTchS布局。结论是,使用其中一种建议方案无助于改善示范区所有河谷-河流景观-技术系统的状况。每个河谷都需要一个单独的方法,其中将使用上述所有方向的组合。在本方案的帮助下,优化的河谷-河流景观将形成当今欧洲国家的自然形象,这将有利于建立均衡发展的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geology Geography and Geoecology
Journal of Geology Geography and Geoecology GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
40.00%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Application of GIS in Land Policy and Planning Strategies in Rural Revitalization The geography of public diplomacy of President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy during the full-scale Russia-Ukraine war The assessment of tourist resources in Ukraine in the conditions of war Hydrogeochemical and water quality index (WQI) evaluated in Beedanahalli watershed T narasipura taluk mysore district, Karnataka, India The resource potential and scenarios for the rural tourism development in Aktobe oblast of the Republic of Kazakhstan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1