Review Essay: Stabilizing Nuclear Southern Asia

Q1 Social Sciences Asian Security Pub Date : 2019-05-30 DOI:10.1080/14799855.2019.1620207
F. O'Donnell
{"title":"Review Essay: Stabilizing Nuclear Southern Asia","authors":"F. O'Donnell","doi":"10.1080/14799855.2019.1620207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This review article considers three significant volumes recently published in the field of Southern Asian security studies. These consist of Not War, Not Peace? Motivating Pakistan to Prevent Cross-Border Terrorism, by Toby Dalton and George Perkovich; Sameer Lalwani and Hannah Haegeland (eds.), Investigating Crises: South Asia’s Lessons, Evolving Dynamics, and Trajectories; and Mooed Yusuf, Brokering Peace in Nuclear Environments: U.S. Crisis Management in South Asia. In the wake of the 2019 India–Pakistan Pulwama militarized crisis, each book focuses on a distinct element of the Southern Asian security milieu that is crucial to understanding drivers of regional insecurity and potential pathways toward greater stability. However, collectively, they leave room for greater exploration for the effects of emerging trends in this regional strategic competition. These include the evolving regional preferences and actions of China, the potential for Pakistan-based terrorist groups to become independent actors throughout a Southern Asian crisis, and the growing prominence of precision-strike standoff weapons in the strategic planning of China, India, and Pakistan. Still, these three volumes prove indispensable for understanding the contemporary political and security dynamics of Southern Asia.","PeriodicalId":35162,"journal":{"name":"Asian Security","volume":"5 1","pages":"127 - 139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2019.1620207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This review article considers three significant volumes recently published in the field of Southern Asian security studies. These consist of Not War, Not Peace? Motivating Pakistan to Prevent Cross-Border Terrorism, by Toby Dalton and George Perkovich; Sameer Lalwani and Hannah Haegeland (eds.), Investigating Crises: South Asia’s Lessons, Evolving Dynamics, and Trajectories; and Mooed Yusuf, Brokering Peace in Nuclear Environments: U.S. Crisis Management in South Asia. In the wake of the 2019 India–Pakistan Pulwama militarized crisis, each book focuses on a distinct element of the Southern Asian security milieu that is crucial to understanding drivers of regional insecurity and potential pathways toward greater stability. However, collectively, they leave room for greater exploration for the effects of emerging trends in this regional strategic competition. These include the evolving regional preferences and actions of China, the potential for Pakistan-based terrorist groups to become independent actors throughout a Southern Asian crisis, and the growing prominence of precision-strike standoff weapons in the strategic planning of China, India, and Pakistan. Still, these three volumes prove indispensable for understanding the contemporary political and security dynamics of Southern Asia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评论文章:稳定核南亚
摘要:本文回顾了南亚安全研究领域最近出版的三本重要著作。这包括:不是战争,不是和平?托比·道尔顿和乔治·佩尔科维奇的《激励巴基斯坦防止跨境恐怖主义》;Sameer Lalwani和Hannah Haegeland主编,《调查危机:南亚的教训、演变的动力和轨迹》;moed Yusuf,《在核环境中促成和平:美国在南亚的危机管理》。在2019年印巴普尔瓦马军事危机之后,每本书都关注南亚安全环境的一个独特因素,这对于理解地区不安全的驱动因素和实现更大稳定的潜在途径至关重要。然而,总的来说,它们为进一步探索这一区域战略竞争新趋势的影响留下了空间。其中包括中国不断变化的地区偏好和行动,巴基斯坦恐怖组织在南亚危机中成为独立行动者的潜力,以及精确打击对峙武器在中国、印度和巴基斯坦的战略规划中日益突出。尽管如此,这三卷书对于理解当代南亚的政治和安全动态是不可或缺的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Security
Asian Security Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Redefining NATO’s Indo-Pacific partnerships: cooperative security meets collective defence and deterrence Political regimes and self-reliance in the Indian arms industry Sailing close to the wind: Japan’s forward deterrence posture toward the Taiwan Strait A neoclassical realist analysis of the evolving Philippines–India defense partnership in the twenty-first century The dragon in central Asia: Is China’s increased economic involvement resulting in security gains?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1