Comparative analysis of the approach to L1 oracy in Polish and Portuguese early education curricula

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.17239/l1esll-2020.20.01.08
Michał Daszkiewicz, Otília Sousa, Marta Łockiewicz, D. Lino, Martyna Piechowska
{"title":"Comparative analysis of the approach to L1 oracy in Polish and Portuguese early education curricula","authors":"Michał Daszkiewicz, Otília Sousa, Marta Łockiewicz, D. Lino, Martyna Piechowska","doi":"10.17239/l1esll-2020.20.01.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of our paper is to describe and examine the approach to oracy in core curricula in two European countries: Poland and Portugal. In the paper, we examine kindergarten and early education L1 curricula, identifying their strengths and weaknesses, similarities and differences, and discuss theoretical positions that support the guiding documents of the educational activities in the two countries. Though Polish and Portuguese early education recommendations and obligations include teaching oracy, the importance they put on its development is quite dissimilar. Polish legislation focuses on teaching literacy. The term “oracy” is not used, and oracy itself is treated as a sub-category with specific requirements concerning most elementary forms of expression, e. g. naming or answering questions. Portu- guese legislation lists orality among four main educational components, together with reading and writing, l iterary education, and grammar. The term “orality” corresponds to oracy, and is treated as a tool for both expression and comprehension, and a prerequisite for advanced cognitive skills. We think that the development of oracy in early education should be considered a priority, together with the development of literacy, taking into account its importance for the children’s future academic achievement and active citizenship.","PeriodicalId":43406,"journal":{"name":"L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17239/l1esll-2020.20.01.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The aim of our paper is to describe and examine the approach to oracy in core curricula in two European countries: Poland and Portugal. In the paper, we examine kindergarten and early education L1 curricula, identifying their strengths and weaknesses, similarities and differences, and discuss theoretical positions that support the guiding documents of the educational activities in the two countries. Though Polish and Portuguese early education recommendations and obligations include teaching oracy, the importance they put on its development is quite dissimilar. Polish legislation focuses on teaching literacy. The term “oracy” is not used, and oracy itself is treated as a sub-category with specific requirements concerning most elementary forms of expression, e. g. naming or answering questions. Portu- guese legislation lists orality among four main educational components, together with reading and writing, l iterary education, and grammar. The term “orality” corresponds to oracy, and is treated as a tool for both expression and comprehension, and a prerequisite for advanced cognitive skills. We think that the development of oracy in early education should be considered a priority, together with the development of literacy, taking into account its importance for the children’s future academic achievement and active citizenship.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波兰语和葡萄牙语早期教育课程中母语教学方法的比较分析
本文的目的是描述和研究两个欧洲国家:波兰和葡萄牙的核心课程中讲道的方法。在本文中,我们考察了幼儿园和早期教育的母语课程,找出了它们的优势和劣势,异同,并讨论了支持两国教育活动指导性文件的理论立场。尽管波兰和葡萄牙的早期教育建议和义务都包括教诗歌,但他们对诗歌发展的重视程度却大不相同。波兰立法的重点是教育扫盲。术语“oracy”没有被使用,oracy本身被视为一个子类,与最基本的表达形式有关,例如命名或回答问题。葡萄牙立法将口语与读写、文学教育和语法并列,列为四个主要的教育组成部分。“口语”一词对应于oracy,被视为表达和理解的工具,是高级认知技能的先决条件。我们认为,在早期教育中,应该优先考虑语言能力的发展,以及读写能力的发展,考虑到它对孩子们未来的学业成就和积极的公民意识的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature
L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Writing to Learn History: An Instructional Design Study High school students’ attentional stance, modes of reading engagement, and self-insight during literary reading Developing the “Language Profile Test” for Greek Students aged 11-15 Years. Strategies for Expository and Literary Texts Separating the relevant from the irrelevant: Factors influencing L1 student teachers’ ability to discern (ir)relevant arguments in time-pressured grammatical discussions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1