Stress Distribution in Occlusal Veneers with Different Finish Lines When Applying Vertical and Tangential Forces

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences Pub Date : 2022-07-18 DOI:10.15517/ijds.2022.51841
Jimmy Aliaga, Rosa S. Caro M., Mónica Hermoza N.
{"title":"Stress Distribution in Occlusal Veneers with Different Finish Lines When Applying Vertical and Tangential Forces","authors":"Jimmy Aliaga, Rosa S. Caro M., Mónica Hermoza N.","doi":"10.15517/ijds.2022.51841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To evaluate stress distribution when applying vertical and tangential forces to 1mm thick occlusal veneers with different finish lines preparations, using the finite element method. One extracted third molar was prepared for occlusal veneers, firstly without any bevel. It was scanned in order to design two groups of lithium disilicate (G1A, G2A) and composite resin (G1B, G2B) occlusal veneers. Then, the third molar preparation was modified, beveling the finish line and it was subsequently scanned again to design the occlusal veneer groups with bevel (LD: G3A, G4A and CR: G3B, G4B). The four groups were subjected to different forces (400 N vertical and 900 N tangential). At 400 N, the non-beveled veneers showed slightly higher Von Mises stress values (G1A: 783 MPa and G1B 736.5 MPa) than the beveled veneers (G3A: 685.7 MPa and G3B: 675.8 MPa). However, when 900 N tangential forces were applied, the beveled occlusal veneers showed higher Von Mises stress values (G4A: 4297 MPa and G4B: 4133 MPa) than the non-beveled occlusal veneers (G2A: 2581.1 MPa and G2B: 3519.1 MPa). Furthermore, it was observed that the tissue under the occlusal veneers with bevel showed higher Von Mises stress values than the models without any bevel. Beveled and non-beveled occlusal veneers of lithium disilicate and composite resin presented similar stress distribution values when vertical forces of 400 N were applied; whereas with tangential forces of 900 N applied near to the finish line, the beveled groups presented notably higher stress values than the non-beveled groups. However, both finish line preparations presented adequate values for possible clinical performance.","PeriodicalId":19450,"journal":{"name":"Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2022.51841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

To evaluate stress distribution when applying vertical and tangential forces to 1mm thick occlusal veneers with different finish lines preparations, using the finite element method. One extracted third molar was prepared for occlusal veneers, firstly without any bevel. It was scanned in order to design two groups of lithium disilicate (G1A, G2A) and composite resin (G1B, G2B) occlusal veneers. Then, the third molar preparation was modified, beveling the finish line and it was subsequently scanned again to design the occlusal veneer groups with bevel (LD: G3A, G4A and CR: G3B, G4B). The four groups were subjected to different forces (400 N vertical and 900 N tangential). At 400 N, the non-beveled veneers showed slightly higher Von Mises stress values (G1A: 783 MPa and G1B 736.5 MPa) than the beveled veneers (G3A: 685.7 MPa and G3B: 675.8 MPa). However, when 900 N tangential forces were applied, the beveled occlusal veneers showed higher Von Mises stress values (G4A: 4297 MPa and G4B: 4133 MPa) than the non-beveled occlusal veneers (G2A: 2581.1 MPa and G2B: 3519.1 MPa). Furthermore, it was observed that the tissue under the occlusal veneers with bevel showed higher Von Mises stress values than the models without any bevel. Beveled and non-beveled occlusal veneers of lithium disilicate and composite resin presented similar stress distribution values when vertical forces of 400 N were applied; whereas with tangential forces of 900 N applied near to the finish line, the beveled groups presented notably higher stress values than the non-beveled groups. However, both finish line preparations presented adequate values for possible clinical performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
施加垂直力和切向力时不同终点线咬合贴面的应力分布
采用有限元法对不同终点线制备的1mm厚咬合贴面施加垂直力和切向力时的应力分布进行评价。拔出一颗第三磨牙用于咬合贴面,首先没有任何斜面。扫描后设计两组二硅酸锂(G1A, G2A)和复合树脂(G1B, G2B)咬合贴面。然后,对第三磨牙进行修饰,使终点线呈斜角,随后再次扫描,设计有斜角的咬合贴面组(LD: G3A, G4A和CR: G3B, G4B)。四组小鼠分别受到400 N垂直力和900 N切向力的作用。在400 N时,非斜面贴面的Von Mises应力值(G1A: 783 MPa, G1B: 736.5 MPa)略高于斜面贴面(G3A: 685.7 MPa, G3B: 675.8 MPa)。然而,当施加900 N切向力时,坡口咬合贴片的Von Mises应力值(G4A: 4297 MPa和G4B: 4133 MPa)高于非坡口咬合贴片(G2A: 2581.1 MPa和G2B: 3519.1 MPa)。此外,我们还观察到,有斜角的咬合贴面下的组织比没有斜角的咬合贴面下的组织具有更高的Von Mises应力值。当垂直力为400 N时,斜口和非斜口的二硅酸锂和复合树脂咬合贴面的应力分布值相似;而在终点线附近施加900牛切向力时,斜面组的应力值明显高于非斜面组。然而,两种终点线制剂对可能的临床表现都有足够的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Current Perspective on Fiberglass Posts Length: Finite Element Study Uses of Chitosan-Based Hydrogels in Dentistry: A Systematic Review Sodium Hypochlorite in Endodontic Therapy: Immutable Hero or Imminent Threat? Exploring the Complexities of Temporomandibular Joint Function and Dysfunction: A Contemporary Review Factors Associated with the Perception of Prehospital Internship Training of Dental and Other Health Sciences Students in the COVID-19 Context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1