EXECUTION OF FIDUCIARY GUARANTEE ON THE MOTOR VEHICLE FINANCING AGREEMENT

Kifah Akifah
{"title":"EXECUTION OF FIDUCIARY GUARANTEE ON THE MOTOR VEHICLE FINANCING AGREEMENT","authors":"Kifah Akifah","doi":"10.25041/iplr.v3i2.2783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Guarantee fiduciary this is basically for make it easy Public in get help credit, howeve iin implementation still arise various problem. Among them is in Thing execution guarantee fiduciary, where is the action arbitrary moment billing still bloom happen. Problem execution guarantee fiduciary return Becomes attention public post decision Court Constitution Number 2/PUU-XIX/2021 on August 31, 2021. There is an assumption that Decision Court Constitution the give convenience to company financing for execute guarantee fiduciary. Destination study this is (1) for analyze execution guarantee fiduciary in agreement financing vehicle motorized post Decision Court Constitution Number 2/PUU-XIX/2021, and (2) for analyze enforcement law to violations committed by debt collectors ( debt collectors ). Study this use method study law normative, with approach law. Fiduciary guarantee is basically conseptualized in order to deliver acess for public to gain credit. However in its implementation, it still arises various problem. Ome of the problem is its execuition. This problem become public attention after the decision made trough court contitutionale Number 21 PUU-X/X/X/2021 on August 2021. There is an assumtion that the decision of constitutional court to company financing for fiduciary guarantee. The purpose of this study is: first analyzing execution in fiduciary guarantee in agreement financing motorized vericle after the constitutional court decision Number 21 PUU-X/X/X/2021 was made. Second, this study also interded to analyze law enforcement to violations commited by debt collectors. This study use normative legal method consisting of legal approach.","PeriodicalId":52582,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Private Law Review","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesia Private Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v3i2.2783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Guarantee fiduciary this is basically for make it easy Public in get help credit, howeve iin implementation still arise various problem. Among them is in Thing execution guarantee fiduciary, where is the action arbitrary moment billing still bloom happen. Problem execution guarantee fiduciary return Becomes attention public post decision Court Constitution Number 2/PUU-XIX/2021 on August 31, 2021. There is an assumption that Decision Court Constitution the give convenience to company financing for execute guarantee fiduciary. Destination study this is (1) for analyze execution guarantee fiduciary in agreement financing vehicle motorized post Decision Court Constitution Number 2/PUU-XIX/2021, and (2) for analyze enforcement law to violations committed by debt collectors ( debt collectors ). Study this use method study law normative, with approach law. Fiduciary guarantee is basically conseptualized in order to deliver acess for public to gain credit. However in its implementation, it still arises various problem. Ome of the problem is its execuition. This problem become public attention after the decision made trough court contitutionale Number 21 PUU-X/X/X/2021 on August 2021. There is an assumtion that the decision of constitutional court to company financing for fiduciary guarantee. The purpose of this study is: first analyzing execution in fiduciary guarantee in agreement financing motorized vericle after the constitutional court decision Number 21 PUU-X/X/X/2021 was made. Second, this study also interded to analyze law enforcement to violations commited by debt collectors. This study use normative legal method consisting of legal approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对机动车融资协议执行信义担保
担保信托这主要是为了便于公众在信用上得到帮助,然而在实施中仍出现各种问题。其中在物的执行保证信义,在动作任意时刻计费还是开花发生。问题执行保证受托回报成为关注公开岗位决定法院章程第2号/PUU-XIX/2021,于2021年8月31日。有一种假设认为,判决法院宪法为公司融资履行担保信托提供了便利。本研究的目的是(1)分析协议融资工具机动化后判决法院宪法第2号/PUU-XIX/2021中的执行担保受托人,以及(2)分析对债务催收人(债务催收人)违法行为的执法法律。学习本使用方法学习法规范,以接近法。信义担保的基本概念是为公众提供获得信用的途径。但在实施过程中,仍存在各种问题。其中一个问题是它的执行。这一问题在2021年8月通过宪法法院第21号PUU-X/X/X/2021号作出决定后引起了公众的关注。有一种假设认为,宪法法院的判决以公司融资为信义担保。本研究的目的是:首先分析宪法法院第21号PUU-X/X/X/2021号判决后协议融资机动车辆的信义担保执行情况。其次,本研究还试图分析对讨债人违法行为的执法情况。本研究采用规范性法律方法,包括法律途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
MEANING SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP BASED ON ACT CREATE WORK IN FRAMEWORK PERSPECTIVE LEGAL HERMENEUTICS JURIDICAL PROBLEMS TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT DUE TO FORCE MAJEURE (REFERRING DECISION NUMBER 30/PDT.SUS-PHI/2020/PN GRESIK) GIVING DOWRY IN LAMPUNG COASTAL TRADITIONAL MARRIAGES FROM AN ISLAMIC LEGAL PERSPECTIVE BREACH OF PEACE AGREEMENT (HOMOLOGATION) BETWEEN PT LAUTAN WARNA SARI AND PT KERTAS LECES (PERSERO) ANTICIPATING FINANCIAL AND DATA PRIVACY RISK: ASSESSING LEGAL RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES IN ONLINE SOCIAL GATHERING IN INDONESIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1