“This Uncertain Space of Teaching:” How Design Studio Instructors Talk About Design Critiques Along with Themselves when Giving Critiques

Jason K. McDonald, Esther Michela
{"title":"“This Uncertain Space of Teaching:” How Design Studio Instructors Talk About Design Critiques Along with Themselves when Giving Critiques","authors":"Jason K. McDonald, Esther Michela","doi":"10.14434/josotl.v22i1.30888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study we explored how design studio instructors depicted the design critique, themselves as people offering critiques, and what can be learned from their depictions about improving instructors’ abilities to offer critiques. To investigate these issues we conducted a case study of studio instructors from design programs at a university in the United States. Our data consisted of three semi-structured interviews and one class observation each with six instructors from different programs, organized into a thematic structure that revealed insights into participants’ self-interpretations. We found that our participants depicted critiques as being a complex challenge, often placing competing demands upon them that they were required to reconcile. They depicted themselves as meeting these challenges through their cultivation of four dispositions that helped them balance tensions they experienced. We report these challenges and dispositions using our participants own words as much as possible. We also discuss implications of these findings for helping studio instructors improve their ability to offer critiques; assistance should take into account the inescapable need instructors will face to balance challenges that arise during critiques, and should also help them cultivate affective dispositions that will help them successfully respond to critique situations.","PeriodicalId":93822,"journal":{"name":"The journal of scholarship of teaching and learning : JoSoTL","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of scholarship of teaching and learning : JoSoTL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v22i1.30888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this study we explored how design studio instructors depicted the design critique, themselves as people offering critiques, and what can be learned from their depictions about improving instructors’ abilities to offer critiques. To investigate these issues we conducted a case study of studio instructors from design programs at a university in the United States. Our data consisted of three semi-structured interviews and one class observation each with six instructors from different programs, organized into a thematic structure that revealed insights into participants’ self-interpretations. We found that our participants depicted critiques as being a complex challenge, often placing competing demands upon them that they were required to reconcile. They depicted themselves as meeting these challenges through their cultivation of four dispositions that helped them balance tensions they experienced. We report these challenges and dispositions using our participants own words as much as possible. We also discuss implications of these findings for helping studio instructors improve their ability to offer critiques; assistance should take into account the inescapable need instructors will face to balance challenges that arise during critiques, and should also help them cultivate affective dispositions that will help them successfully respond to critique situations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“这个不确定的教学空间:”设计工作室教师如何在给予批评时与自己一起谈论设计批评
在这项研究中,我们探讨了设计工作室的教师如何描述设计批评,他们自己是提供批评的人,以及我们可以从他们的描述中学到什么,以提高教师提供批评的能力。为了调查这些问题,我们对美国一所大学设计专业的工作室教师进行了案例研究。我们的数据包括三次半结构化访谈和一次课堂观察,每一次访谈由来自不同项目的六名教师进行,并组织成一个主题结构,揭示了参与者对自我解释的见解。我们发现,我们的参与者将批评描述为一个复杂的挑战,经常对他们提出相互竞争的要求,他们需要调和。他们将自己描述为通过培养四种性格来应对这些挑战,这些性格帮助他们平衡所经历的紧张关系。我们尽可能用参与者自己的话来报道这些挑战和倾向。我们还讨论了这些发现对帮助工作室教师提高他们提供批评的能力的影响;援助应考虑到教师将面临的不可避免的需求,以平衡批评期间出现的挑战,还应帮助他们培养情感倾向,帮助他们成功地应对批评情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 weeks
期刊最新文献
Inclusive Access Course Materials: An Analysis of a Technical College’s Inclusive Access Program Re-Envisioning Learning through a Trauma-Informed Lens: Empowering Students in their Personal and Academic Growth Exploring Achievement Behaviors in Non-Major Statistics Course: An Expectancy-Value Perspective and Thoughts for Practice Curating, Community, Collaboration Pausing for More
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1