Jian-hong Yang, L. Chang, Kai-Chi Hsu, C. Fan, D. Doley, G. Song, Michael Song, G. Vacchiano
{"title":"The nurse-plant effect under the dislodgement stress of landslides","authors":"Jian-hong Yang, L. Chang, Kai-Chi Hsu, C. Fan, D. Doley, G. Song, Michael Song, G. Vacchiano","doi":"10.3832/ifor4017-015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the mitigating effects of trees on shallow landslide occurrence are well recognised, the impact of landslides on tree community structure and tree-tree interactions have received much less research attention. The structures of tree communities before and after landslides were compared in a 25-ha subtropical forest plot. Tree-tree interactions were examined by analysing the pre-and post-landslide spatial point patterns of large (DBH ≥ 20 cm) and small (1 cm ≤ DBH < 20 cm) tree cohorts. In landslide scarps, 35 (34%) of 104 large trees and 467 (13%) of 3,072 small trees survived. Large (L) and small (S) tree cohorts were paired together for spatial analyses, including pre-landslide ( PL ) (L PL -S PL ), surviving ( S ) (L S -S S ), and missing ( M ) large-small tree paired cohorts (L M - S M ). We randomly selected trees from the pre-landslide tree cohorts to create two virtual paired cohorts, the L 34% -S 13% and L 66% -S 87% paired cohorts, whose population sizes were identical to the field-observed L S -S S and L M -S M paired cohorts respectively, but with random spatial patterns. Post-landslide survival rates of trees increased monotonically with DBH. Large trees dislodged by landslides scarcely reduced small-tree survival. Evidence for this included: (i) the distance from small trees to the nearest large trees of the L M -S M paired cohort did not differ significantly from that of the virtual L 66% -S 87% paired cohort; (ii) survival rates of small trees near L M individuals did not differ significantly from those without large trees nearby. Surviving large trees had positive effects on the survival of small trees, indicated by: (i) the distance from small trees to the nearest large trees of the L S -S S paired cohort was significantly lower than that of the virtual L 34% -S 13% paired cohort; (ii) S S individuals clumped around L S individuals, whereas the virtual L 34% -S 13% spatial relationship was random. Large trees prevent landslide dislodgement of adjacent small trees through the nurse-plant effect. Our study suggests that landslide damage in sloping forests may be reduced simply by constantly maintaining a critical density of large trees.","PeriodicalId":13323,"journal":{"name":"Iforest - Biogeosciences and Forestry","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iforest - Biogeosciences and Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor4017-015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
While the mitigating effects of trees on shallow landslide occurrence are well recognised, the impact of landslides on tree community structure and tree-tree interactions have received much less research attention. The structures of tree communities before and after landslides were compared in a 25-ha subtropical forest plot. Tree-tree interactions were examined by analysing the pre-and post-landslide spatial point patterns of large (DBH ≥ 20 cm) and small (1 cm ≤ DBH < 20 cm) tree cohorts. In landslide scarps, 35 (34%) of 104 large trees and 467 (13%) of 3,072 small trees survived. Large (L) and small (S) tree cohorts were paired together for spatial analyses, including pre-landslide ( PL ) (L PL -S PL ), surviving ( S ) (L S -S S ), and missing ( M ) large-small tree paired cohorts (L M - S M ). We randomly selected trees from the pre-landslide tree cohorts to create two virtual paired cohorts, the L 34% -S 13% and L 66% -S 87% paired cohorts, whose population sizes were identical to the field-observed L S -S S and L M -S M paired cohorts respectively, but with random spatial patterns. Post-landslide survival rates of trees increased monotonically with DBH. Large trees dislodged by landslides scarcely reduced small-tree survival. Evidence for this included: (i) the distance from small trees to the nearest large trees of the L M -S M paired cohort did not differ significantly from that of the virtual L 66% -S 87% paired cohort; (ii) survival rates of small trees near L M individuals did not differ significantly from those without large trees nearby. Surviving large trees had positive effects on the survival of small trees, indicated by: (i) the distance from small trees to the nearest large trees of the L S -S S paired cohort was significantly lower than that of the virtual L 34% -S 13% paired cohort; (ii) S S individuals clumped around L S individuals, whereas the virtual L 34% -S 13% spatial relationship was random. Large trees prevent landslide dislodgement of adjacent small trees through the nurse-plant effect. Our study suggests that landslide damage in sloping forests may be reduced simply by constantly maintaining a critical density of large trees.
期刊介绍:
The journal encompasses a broad range of research aspects concerning forest science: forest ecology, biodiversity/genetics and ecophysiology, silviculture, forest inventory and planning, forest protection and monitoring, forest harvesting, landscape ecology, forest history, wood technology.