Objective structured practical examination as a tool of assessing practical skills in clinical physiology: Perceptions of medical students and faculty

Q4 Medicine Scripta Medica Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5937/scriptamed53-35975
Anshul Sharma, H. Tahilramani, Minakshi Misra, S. Somani, A. Tak
{"title":"Objective structured practical examination as a tool of assessing practical skills in clinical physiology: Perceptions of medical students and faculty","authors":"Anshul Sharma, H. Tahilramani, Minakshi Misra, S. Somani, A. Tak","doi":"10.5937/scriptamed53-35975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background / Aim: Competence can be acquired in medical education if the assessment of students is multidimensional. Traditional practical assessments focus on testing the cognitive domain and compromise practical skills evaluation. The Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE) assesses skill-based competencies. The present study evaluates the feasibility and acceptability of OSPE through the perception of students and mentors. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 100 medical students and 15 medical faculties enrolled from Pandit Deendayal Upadhyaya medical college, Churu (Rajasthan, India). The study included OSPE stations, conducted three OSPE sessions and obtained post-session feedback through a questionnaire, answered on 5 points Likert scale. The researchers calculated the response on various aspects of OSPE with percentages. Results: Students showed 94.4 % agreement for OSPE as a good learning experience and 93.5 % were satisfied with the content of OSPE. Students' perception of OSPE as a reliable and fair tool for examination and administration was 94.66 % and 56.40 %, respectively. Although, 69.5 % of students agreed upon OSPE as a valuable tool compared with the traditional reviews. The overall agreement of faculty for the competence of OSPE was 75.74 %. Conclusion: The acceptance of OSPE by medical students and faculty may lead to the introduction of this tool in assessing practical skills in medical teaching and helping students better acquire knowledge and skills and assisting faculty in teaching modifications, as per the needs of students. So, OSPE supplements the traditional methods in clinical physiology practical assessments.","PeriodicalId":33497,"journal":{"name":"Scripta Medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scripta Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/scriptamed53-35975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background / Aim: Competence can be acquired in medical education if the assessment of students is multidimensional. Traditional practical assessments focus on testing the cognitive domain and compromise practical skills evaluation. The Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE) assesses skill-based competencies. The present study evaluates the feasibility and acceptability of OSPE through the perception of students and mentors. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 100 medical students and 15 medical faculties enrolled from Pandit Deendayal Upadhyaya medical college, Churu (Rajasthan, India). The study included OSPE stations, conducted three OSPE sessions and obtained post-session feedback through a questionnaire, answered on 5 points Likert scale. The researchers calculated the response on various aspects of OSPE with percentages. Results: Students showed 94.4 % agreement for OSPE as a good learning experience and 93.5 % were satisfied with the content of OSPE. Students' perception of OSPE as a reliable and fair tool for examination and administration was 94.66 % and 56.40 %, respectively. Although, 69.5 % of students agreed upon OSPE as a valuable tool compared with the traditional reviews. The overall agreement of faculty for the competence of OSPE was 75.74 %. Conclusion: The acceptance of OSPE by medical students and faculty may lead to the introduction of this tool in assessing practical skills in medical teaching and helping students better acquire knowledge and skills and assisting faculty in teaching modifications, as per the needs of students. So, OSPE supplements the traditional methods in clinical physiology practical assessments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
客观结构化的实践考试作为评估临床生理学实践技能的工具:医学生和教师的看法
背景/目的:在医学教育中,只有对学生进行多维度的评价,才能培养学生的能力。传统的实践评估侧重于对认知领域的测试,而不利于实践技能的评估。客观结构化实践考试(OSPE)评估基于技能的能力。本研究透过学生与导师的认知,来评估大学生自我评估的可行性与可接受性。方法:在这项横断面研究中,来自印度拉贾斯坦邦Churu Pandit Deendayal Upadhyaya医学院的100名医学生和15个医学院的学生。本研究包括OSPE站点,进行了三次OSPE会话,并通过5分李克特量表问卷获得会话后反馈。研究人员用百分比计算了人们对spe各个方面的反应。结果:94.4%的学生认为英语教学是一次很好的学习经历,93.5%的学生对英语教学内容感到满意。学生认为spe是一种可靠、公平的考试和管理工具的比例分别为94.66%和56.40%。尽管如此,69.5%的学生认为与传统的评估相比,spe是一个有价值的工具。教师对OSPE能力的总体认可度为75.74%。结论:医学生和教师对OSPE的接受可能会导致在医学教学中引入该工具来评估实践技能,帮助学生更好地获得知识和技能,并根据学生的需要协助教师修改教学。因此,OSPE是对传统临床生理实用评估方法的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Outcome of vacuum assisted dressing in open comminuted tibial fracture with primary fixation Assessment of adverse drug reactions in oral cancer patients receiving chemotherapy treatment at tertiary care centres in North-Western India Occupational diseases in the Republic of Srpska from 2011-2020 Spontaneous closure of isolated Ventricular septal defect in the first year A pilot test for implementing precision healthcare programme in patients with diabetes in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1