Treatment Tactics for Patients with Isolated Injuries of the Fifth Lumbar Vertebra

S. Likhachev, V. Zaretskov, V. B. Arsenievich, V. Ostrovskij, I. Shchanitsyn, A. Shulga, S. Bazhanov
{"title":"Treatment Tactics for Patients with Isolated Injuries of the Fifth Lumbar Vertebra","authors":"S. Likhachev, V. Zaretskov, V. B. Arsenievich, V. Ostrovskij, I. Shchanitsyn, A. Shulga, S. Bazhanov","doi":"10.17691/stm2021.13.5.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The major management technique for lumbar burst fractures is transpedicular fixation (TPF). However, in relation to fractures of the L5 vertebra, this tactic often has no advantages over conservative treatment, and, therefore, it is expected to be supplemented with anterior decompression and reconstruction of the anterior column of the L5 vertebra. The aim of the study was to determine the most optimal treatment tactics for patients with isolated burst fractures of the fifth lumbar vertebra. Materials and Methods We performed a retrospective study of 58 patients treated for isolated burst L5 fractures. 12 patients refused to undergo surgery and received conservative outpatient treatment. TPF was performed in 27 patients; circular spondylosynthesis (TPF + anterior column support with a Mesh implant) — in 19 patients. The effectiveness of the treatment was assessed by clinical and introscopic research methods. Results The radiological and functional outcomes of surgery with conventional TPF for isolated L5 burst fractures are generally comparable with the outcomes of conservative treatment. In 26% of the patients, the instability of the metal construction developed within 12 months after surgical intervention. Supplementing the transpedicular system with wedging anterior column support with a Mesh implant ensures preservation in 21%, and improves the parameters of the sagittal profile of the lumbosacral transition in 79% of cases.","PeriodicalId":18710,"journal":{"name":"Modern Technologies in Medicine","volume":"27 1","pages":"31 - 39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Technologies in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2021.13.5.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The major management technique for lumbar burst fractures is transpedicular fixation (TPF). However, in relation to fractures of the L5 vertebra, this tactic often has no advantages over conservative treatment, and, therefore, it is expected to be supplemented with anterior decompression and reconstruction of the anterior column of the L5 vertebra. The aim of the study was to determine the most optimal treatment tactics for patients with isolated burst fractures of the fifth lumbar vertebra. Materials and Methods We performed a retrospective study of 58 patients treated for isolated burst L5 fractures. 12 patients refused to undergo surgery and received conservative outpatient treatment. TPF was performed in 27 patients; circular spondylosynthesis (TPF + anterior column support with a Mesh implant) — in 19 patients. The effectiveness of the treatment was assessed by clinical and introscopic research methods. Results The radiological and functional outcomes of surgery with conventional TPF for isolated L5 burst fractures are generally comparable with the outcomes of conservative treatment. In 26% of the patients, the instability of the metal construction developed within 12 months after surgical intervention. Supplementing the transpedicular system with wedging anterior column support with a Mesh implant ensures preservation in 21%, and improves the parameters of the sagittal profile of the lumbosacral transition in 79% of cases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孤立性第五腰椎损伤的治疗策略
腰椎爆裂骨折的主要治疗技术是经椎弓根固定(TPF)。然而,对于L5椎体骨折,这种策略往往没有保守治疗的优势,因此,预计将辅以前路减压和L5椎体前柱重建。本研究的目的是为孤立性第五腰椎爆裂骨折患者确定最佳治疗策略。材料和方法我们对58例治疗孤立性爆裂性L5骨折的患者进行回顾性研究。12例患者拒绝手术,接受保守门诊治疗。27例患者行TPF;圆形椎体融合术(TPF +前柱支撑加网状植入物)- 19例患者。采用临床和内窥镜研究方法评价治疗效果。结果常规TPF治疗孤立性L5爆裂骨折的放射学和功能结果与保守治疗的结果大致相当。26%的患者在手术后12个月内出现金属结构不稳定。在经椎弓根系统中添加楔形前柱支撑和网状植入物,可确保21%的患者保留椎弓根,79%的患者改善腰骶过渡的矢状面轮廓参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Histological Justification for the Need of Radiofrequency Ablation of Pulmonary Arteries in Patients with High-Grade Secondary Pulmonary Hypertension Current Methods for the Isolation and Cultivation of Microglia (Review) Scintigraphic Imaging of Inflammation in the Aortic Wall Using 99mTc-Pyrophosphate SNP-Based Chromosomal Microarray Analysis for Detecting DNA Copy Number Variations in Fetuses with a Thickened Nuchal Fold Choosing the Optimal Rat Stock as a Model for Research into Pharmacological Correction of Male Sexual Dysfunction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1