Calculation of protein-ligand binding free energy using smooth reaction path generation (SRPG) method: a comparison of the explicit water model, gb/sa model and docking score function.

D. Mitomo, Y. Fukunishi, J. Higo, Haruki Nakamura
{"title":"Calculation of protein-ligand binding free energy using smooth reaction path generation (SRPG) method: a comparison of the explicit water model, gb/sa model and docking score function.","authors":"D. Mitomo, Y. Fukunishi, J. Higo, Haruki Nakamura","doi":"10.1142/9781848165632_0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compared the protein-ligand binding free energies (G) obtained by the explicit water model, the MM-GB/SA (molecular-mechanics generalized Born surface area) model, and the docking scoring function. The free energies by the explicit water model and the MM-GB/SA model were calculated by the previously developed Smooth Reaction Path Generation (SRPG) method. In the SRPG method, a smooth reaction path was generated by linking two coordinates, one a bound state and the other an unbound state. The free energy surface along the path was calculated by a molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, and the binding free energy was estimated from the free energy surface. We applied these methods to the streptavidin-and-biotin system. The G value by the explicit water model was close to the experimental value. The G value by the MM-GB/SA model was overestimated and that by the scoring function was underestimated. The free energy surface by the explicit water model was close to that by the GB/SA model around the bound state (distances of < 6 A), but the discrepancy appears at distances of > 6 A. Thus, the difference in long-range Coulomb interaction should cause the error in G. The scoring function cannot take into account the entropy change of the protein. Thus, the error of G could depend on the target protein.","PeriodicalId":73143,"journal":{"name":"Genome informatics. International Conference on Genome Informatics","volume":"6 1","pages":"85-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome informatics. International Conference on Genome Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/9781848165632_0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

We compared the protein-ligand binding free energies (G) obtained by the explicit water model, the MM-GB/SA (molecular-mechanics generalized Born surface area) model, and the docking scoring function. The free energies by the explicit water model and the MM-GB/SA model were calculated by the previously developed Smooth Reaction Path Generation (SRPG) method. In the SRPG method, a smooth reaction path was generated by linking two coordinates, one a bound state and the other an unbound state. The free energy surface along the path was calculated by a molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, and the binding free energy was estimated from the free energy surface. We applied these methods to the streptavidin-and-biotin system. The G value by the explicit water model was close to the experimental value. The G value by the MM-GB/SA model was overestimated and that by the scoring function was underestimated. The free energy surface by the explicit water model was close to that by the GB/SA model around the bound state (distances of < 6 A), but the discrepancy appears at distances of > 6 A. Thus, the difference in long-range Coulomb interaction should cause the error in G. The scoring function cannot take into account the entropy change of the protein. Thus, the error of G could depend on the target protein.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们比较了显式水模型、MM-GB/SA(分子力学广义Born表面积)模型和对接评分函数得到的蛋白质-配体结合自由能(G)。通过显式水模型和MM-GB/SA模型计算自由能,采用光滑反应路径生成(SRPG)方法。在SRPG方法中,通过连接两个坐标,一个是束缚态,另一个是非束缚态,来生成光滑的反应路径。通过分子动力学(MD)模拟计算了沿路径的自由能面,并从自由能面估计了结合自由能。我们将这些方法应用于链霉亲和素-生物素系统。显式水模型计算的G值与实验值较为接近。MM-GB/SA模型的G值被高估,评分函数的G值被低估。在束缚态(< 6 A)附近,显式水模型的自由能面与GB/SA模型的自由能面接近,但在> 6 A处出现差异。因此,远程库仑相互作用的差异会导致g的误差。评分函数不能考虑蛋白质的熵变。因此,G的误差可能取决于靶蛋白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Docking-calculation-based method for predicting protein-RNA interactions. Sign: large-scale gene network estimation environment for high performance computing. Linear regression models predicting strength of transcriptional activity of promoters. Database for crude drugs and Kampo medicine. Mechanism of cell cycle disruption by multiple p53 pulses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1