Perceptions of the Sexual Assault Exam in the Emergency DepartmentSetting

Ann Thomas, Michelle A. Lyn, A. Caviness, Deborah C. Hsu, X. Tran, A. Giardino
{"title":"Perceptions of the Sexual Assault Exam in the Emergency DepartmentSetting","authors":"Ann Thomas, Michelle A. Lyn, A. Caviness, Deborah C. Hsu, X. Tran, A. Giardino","doi":"10.2174/1874309901206010041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The purpose of this study is to determine how pediatric patients and/or their parents being interviewed and examined for suspected sexual assault perceive their experiences in the emergency department. Methods: A prospective study was conducted at an emergency department. A convenience sample was enrolled from September 2007 to February 2009. At the completion of the medical examination, patients and/or parents were asked to take part in a survey. Results: A total of 87 completed questionnaires were collected; 50 completed by parents/guardians and 37 completed by the patients; 14 patients had both parent and patient questionnaires completed. Of all 87 respondents, 74% of parents and 65% of the patients rated the overall quality of care as excellent, 90% of parents and 70.3% of patients rated the physician kindness as excellent, and 90% and 86.5% respectively rated the nurse kindness as excellent. Of the 50 patients, 35.1% patients found the exam sometimes or very painful and 40.5% found the exam scary sometimes to extremely scary. Patients who perceived the exam painful or scary did not rate their quality of medical care as lower than those who did not find the exam painful or scary, p=0.513 and p=0.800 respectively. Conclusions: Encouragingly, the emergency department environment did not cause higher levels of distress, anxiety or discomfort than other groups of patients evaluated in child abuse evaluation centers.","PeriodicalId":89037,"journal":{"name":"The open pediatric medicine journal","volume":"57 1","pages":"41-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open pediatric medicine journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874309901206010041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to determine how pediatric patients and/or their parents being interviewed and examined for suspected sexual assault perceive their experiences in the emergency department. Methods: A prospective study was conducted at an emergency department. A convenience sample was enrolled from September 2007 to February 2009. At the completion of the medical examination, patients and/or parents were asked to take part in a survey. Results: A total of 87 completed questionnaires were collected; 50 completed by parents/guardians and 37 completed by the patients; 14 patients had both parent and patient questionnaires completed. Of all 87 respondents, 74% of parents and 65% of the patients rated the overall quality of care as excellent, 90% of parents and 70.3% of patients rated the physician kindness as excellent, and 90% and 86.5% respectively rated the nurse kindness as excellent. Of the 50 patients, 35.1% patients found the exam sometimes or very painful and 40.5% found the exam scary sometimes to extremely scary. Patients who perceived the exam painful or scary did not rate their quality of medical care as lower than those who did not find the exam painful or scary, p=0.513 and p=0.800 respectively. Conclusions: Encouragingly, the emergency department environment did not cause higher levels of distress, anxiety or discomfort than other groups of patients evaluated in child abuse evaluation centers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在急诊科设置的性侵犯考试的看法
目的:本研究的目的是确定儿科患者和/或他们的父母被询问和检查涉嫌性侵犯如何看待他们在急诊科的经历。方法:在急诊科进行前瞻性研究。从2007年9月至2009年2月登记了方便样本。在体检完成后,要求患者和/或家长参加一项调查。结果:共回收问卷87份;50份由家长/监护人填写,37份由患者填写;14例患者完成了父母和患者的问卷调查。87名被调查者中,74%的家长和65%的患者认为整体护理质量为优秀,90%的家长和70.3%的患者认为医生的善良为优秀,90%和86.5%的患者认为护士的善良为优秀。在50例患者中,35.1%的患者认为考试有时或非常痛苦,40.5%的患者认为考试有时到非常可怕。认为考试痛苦或可怕的患者对医疗质量的评价并不低于没有感到考试痛苦或可怕的患者,p=0.513和p=0.800分别。结论:令人鼓舞的是,急诊科的环境并没有比在儿童虐待评估中心评估的其他组患者引起更高水平的痛苦、焦虑或不适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma ALK-Negative: About a Rare Pediatric Case Report Children and Coronavirus Infection (Covid-19): What to Tell Children to Avoid Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Simple Virilizing Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia: A case Report of Sudanese 46, XY DSD male with G293D variant in CYP21A2 Recurrent Hemolytic Anemia as an Inaugural Manifestation of Wilson Disease in Children: A Case Report Infantile GM1-Gangliosidosis Revealed by Slate-Grey Mongolian Spots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1