Comparison of Growth Characteristics Fruit Vegetable Seedlings Grown on Cylindrical Paper Pot Trays of Plug Trays

D. Jang, 장 동철, Young-woo Kwon, K. Choi, Ii-Seop Kim, 권 용우, 최 기영, 김 일섭
{"title":"Comparison of Growth Characteristics Fruit Vegetable Seedlings Grown on Cylindrical Paper Pot Trays of Plug Trays","authors":"D. Jang, 장 동철, Young-woo Kwon, K. Choi, Ii-Seop Kim, 권 용우, 최 기영, 김 일섭","doi":"10.12791/KSBEC.2018.27.4.381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to examine the growth characteristics of seedlings of several major fruit vegetables and compare them between plants grown with the conventional plug seedling system (Plug) and those grown with the cylindrical paper pot system (CPP). There were no significant differences in shoot growth characteristics, such as plant height, leaf area, dry weight, and fresh weight, between tomato, cucumber, and watermelon plants grown with the CPP and Plug systems. The total root lengths of tomato and cucumber plants grown with Plug were longer than those grown with CPP at the beginning of seedling growth, and the total root lengths of watermelon grown with Plug were longer than those grown with CPP throughout the whole seedling period. The length of root that separated five steps according to the diameter of the root of tomato did not differ between CPP and Plug, but those of cucumber and watermelon were 20-251% longer with Plug than with CPP for all kinds of roots. The fresh weight of Plug-grown tomato roots was about 30% heavier than that of CPP-grown tomato during the seedling period, but the difference decreased as growth progressed. Finally, there was no difference between plants before and after transplanting. The fresh weights of the Plug-grown plants were about 20-30% heavier than those of CPP-grown ones in terms of the whole seedling. After transplanting to the Wagner pot, the shoot growth of Plug-grown watermelon plants in terms of dry weight was low until 7 days had passed. However, this tendency was reversed from 8 days after transplantation onward. In conclusion, there were no significance differences in the growth of shoots between plants grown with the CPP and Plug systems. However, root development was better with Plug than with CPP. Additional key words : Tomato, Cucumber, Watermelon, Seedling quality, Compactness, Root development","PeriodicalId":20654,"journal":{"name":"Protected horticulture and Plant Factory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Protected horticulture and Plant Factory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12791/KSBEC.2018.27.4.381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine the growth characteristics of seedlings of several major fruit vegetables and compare them between plants grown with the conventional plug seedling system (Plug) and those grown with the cylindrical paper pot system (CPP). There were no significant differences in shoot growth characteristics, such as plant height, leaf area, dry weight, and fresh weight, between tomato, cucumber, and watermelon plants grown with the CPP and Plug systems. The total root lengths of tomato and cucumber plants grown with Plug were longer than those grown with CPP at the beginning of seedling growth, and the total root lengths of watermelon grown with Plug were longer than those grown with CPP throughout the whole seedling period. The length of root that separated five steps according to the diameter of the root of tomato did not differ between CPP and Plug, but those of cucumber and watermelon were 20-251% longer with Plug than with CPP for all kinds of roots. The fresh weight of Plug-grown tomato roots was about 30% heavier than that of CPP-grown tomato during the seedling period, but the difference decreased as growth progressed. Finally, there was no difference between plants before and after transplanting. The fresh weights of the Plug-grown plants were about 20-30% heavier than those of CPP-grown ones in terms of the whole seedling. After transplanting to the Wagner pot, the shoot growth of Plug-grown watermelon plants in terms of dry weight was low until 7 days had passed. However, this tendency was reversed from 8 days after transplantation onward. In conclusion, there were no significance differences in the growth of shoots between plants grown with the CPP and Plug systems. However, root development was better with Plug than with CPP. Additional key words : Tomato, Cucumber, Watermelon, Seedling quality, Compactness, Root development
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
圆柱纸钵与塞盘育苗生长特性的比较
本研究对几种主要水果蔬菜的幼苗生长特性进行了研究,并对传统塞苗系统(plug)和圆柱纸盆系统(CPP)幼苗的生长特性进行了比较。CPP和Plug处理下番茄、黄瓜和西瓜的茎部生长特征(株高、叶面积、干重和鲜重)均无显著差异。在幼苗生长初期,用Plug栽培的番茄和黄瓜植株的总根长均大于用CPP栽培的植株,在整个苗期,用Plug栽培的西瓜植株的总根长均大于用CPP栽培的植株。CPP和Plug对番茄按根径分5步的根长无显著影响,但Plug处理的黄瓜和西瓜的根长比CPP处理的长20 ~ 251%。苗期扦插番茄根系鲜重比扦插番茄重30%左右,但随着生长的推进差异逐渐减小。移栽前后植株间无差异。扦插苗的鲜重比扦插苗重20 ~ 30%。移栽至Wagner锅后,即食西瓜植株的茎部生长在干重方面较低,直至7 d。然而,这种趋势从移植后8天开始逆转。综上所述,CPP和Plug两种体系的植株在芽部生长方面无显著差异。但与CPP相比,Plug处理的根系发育更好。附加关键词:番茄、黄瓜、西瓜、幼苗质量、密实度、根系发育
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Seeding, seedling production and transplanting Biological factor management Micro- and mini-PFALs for improving the quality of life in urban areas Physical environmental factors and their properties Role of the plant factory with artificial lighting (PFAL) in urban areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1