Homiletical-liturgical Perspectives on Life in the Anthropocene: The Preeminence of People's Cognition, Weltanschauung, and Homeless Minds

Q3 Arts and Humanities Studia Liturgica Pub Date : 2023-07-18 DOI:10.1177/00393207231185590
F. Kruger
{"title":"Homiletical-liturgical Perspectives on Life in the Anthropocene: The Preeminence of People's Cognition, Weltanschauung, and Homeless Minds","authors":"F. Kruger","doi":"10.1177/00393207231185590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The central theme of this article is the matter of church participants’ engagement in liturgy and how this could enhance their capacity for making moral decisions when it comes to life in the Anthropocene. First, one should acknowledge that liturgists in faith communities have to deal with the notion of people enclaved in the idea of homeless minds. They are exposed to contradictory views on reality. The concept of cognitive dissonance needs to be addressed, and without constructive homiletical-liturgical address of this matter, it will lead to people looking for answers elsewhere. Liturgy inevitably enables participants to see things they do not or may not want to. People want to make sense of life and experiences in daily life, a process well-known as cognition. It should also be acknowledged that without reflection on the functioning of attitudes within Weltanschauung's framework, numerous challenges for any debate on life in the Anthropocene will be experienced. First, this article offers a description of the currently concerning aspects to be found under this rubric. Second, systemizing perspectives based on the philosophy of religion, anthropology, bioethics, and cognitive psychology are examined as centered on the intimate interplay with ethical conduct in viewing the world and liturgy. Finally, the following research question is formulated and briefly discussed: How could a homiletical-liturgical praxeology dealing with the homeless mind enable its participants to cultivate a Weltanschauung committed to a focused interest in the Anthropocene? The methodological approach of Browning has been carefully identified to arrange the research into coherent phases and reflect on the research question.","PeriodicalId":39597,"journal":{"name":"Studia Liturgica","volume":"14 1","pages":"202 - 226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Liturgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00393207231185590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The central theme of this article is the matter of church participants’ engagement in liturgy and how this could enhance their capacity for making moral decisions when it comes to life in the Anthropocene. First, one should acknowledge that liturgists in faith communities have to deal with the notion of people enclaved in the idea of homeless minds. They are exposed to contradictory views on reality. The concept of cognitive dissonance needs to be addressed, and without constructive homiletical-liturgical address of this matter, it will lead to people looking for answers elsewhere. Liturgy inevitably enables participants to see things they do not or may not want to. People want to make sense of life and experiences in daily life, a process well-known as cognition. It should also be acknowledged that without reflection on the functioning of attitudes within Weltanschauung's framework, numerous challenges for any debate on life in the Anthropocene will be experienced. First, this article offers a description of the currently concerning aspects to be found under this rubric. Second, systemizing perspectives based on the philosophy of religion, anthropology, bioethics, and cognitive psychology are examined as centered on the intimate interplay with ethical conduct in viewing the world and liturgy. Finally, the following research question is formulated and briefly discussed: How could a homiletical-liturgical praxeology dealing with the homeless mind enable its participants to cultivate a Weltanschauung committed to a focused interest in the Anthropocene? The methodological approach of Browning has been carefully identified to arrange the research into coherent phases and reflect on the research question.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人类世的布道-礼仪生命观:人的认知、世界观与无家之心的卓越
本文的中心主题是教会参与者参与礼拜仪式的问题,以及当涉及到人类世的生活时,这如何能提高他们做出道德决定的能力。首先,我们应该承认,信仰团体的礼仪学家必须处理人们被包围在无家可归思想中的概念。他们对现实的看法相互矛盾。认知失调的概念需要解决,如果没有建设性的说教和礼仪来解决这个问题,它将导致人们在其他地方寻找答案。礼仪不可避免地使参与者看到他们没有或可能不想看到的东西。人们想要理解日常生活中的生活和经历,这一过程被称为认知。还应该承认,如果不反思在世界观框架内态度的作用,任何关于人类世生命的辩论都将面临许多挑战。首先,本文提供了当前有关方面的描述,可以在这个标题下找到。其次,基于宗教哲学、人类学、生命伦理学和认知心理学的系统化观点,以观察世界和礼拜仪式时与伦理行为的密切相互作用为中心进行了研究。最后,本文提出并简要讨论了以下研究问题:处理无家可归者思想的说教-礼仪行为学如何使其参与者能够培养一个专注于人类世的世界观?勃朗宁的方法论方法已经被仔细地确定,以便将研究安排到连贯的阶段,并反映研究问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Liturgica
Studia Liturgica Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Ministry in the Highland Countries: Lay Readership and Ordained Ministry in the Swiss Reformed Church and the Church of Scotland From Interdenominational to Interreligious Ecumenism at Taizé and Le Jour du Seigneur Liturgical Formation through Ecumenical Experiences:Insights from Inter-University and Inter-Confessional Lectures Identifying Diversity for Promoting Unity: A Liturgical and Systematic Theological Exploration of Involved Risks Sharing of Liturgical, Theological, and Ecumenical Gifts: A Quest for a Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1