A Pilot Clinical Trial of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Mild Cognitive Impairment

S. Esmaeili, M. Abbasi, Ensieh Malekdar, M. Joghataei, M. Mehrpour
{"title":"A Pilot Clinical Trial of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Mild Cognitive Impairment","authors":"S. Esmaeili, M. Abbasi, Ensieh Malekdar, M. Joghataei, M. Mehrpour","doi":"10.14740/jnr622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is defined as a progressive memory dysfunction. There are controversies with regards to whether repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) could improve the condition. Methods: In a randomized, self-control, crossover clinical trial, effect of rTMS on cognitive performance in patients with MCI was assessed. Patients were randomized into two study groups (A and B) and received both rTMS procedure and sham therapy in sequence, with each lasting for 8 weeks. Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) test was performed as a cognition battery at baseline and 1 week after each 8-week period of interventions. Results: Sixteen patients were enrolled in the study. Baseline measures of MoCA were statistically equal between two groups (P value = 0.10). Mean MoCA score significantly increased in group A at nine-week follow-up compared to both group B (P value < 0.001) and its baseline (P value = 0.01). However, at 18-week follow-up, mean MoCA scores were increased in both groups compared to their baseline (both P values < 0.001) with no significant differences between study groups (P value = 0.87). No adverse effects were reported. Conclusions: The rTMS is suggested as an effective and safe therapeutic option for cognitive improvement in patients with MCI. J Neurol Res. 2020;000(000):000-000 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jnr622","PeriodicalId":16489,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology Research","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/jnr622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is defined as a progressive memory dysfunction. There are controversies with regards to whether repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) could improve the condition. Methods: In a randomized, self-control, crossover clinical trial, effect of rTMS on cognitive performance in patients with MCI was assessed. Patients were randomized into two study groups (A and B) and received both rTMS procedure and sham therapy in sequence, with each lasting for 8 weeks. Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) test was performed as a cognition battery at baseline and 1 week after each 8-week period of interventions. Results: Sixteen patients were enrolled in the study. Baseline measures of MoCA were statistically equal between two groups (P value = 0.10). Mean MoCA score significantly increased in group A at nine-week follow-up compared to both group B (P value < 0.001) and its baseline (P value = 0.01). However, at 18-week follow-up, mean MoCA scores were increased in both groups compared to their baseline (both P values < 0.001) with no significant differences between study groups (P value = 0.87). No adverse effects were reported. Conclusions: The rTMS is suggested as an effective and safe therapeutic option for cognitive improvement in patients with MCI. J Neurol Res. 2020;000(000):000-000 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jnr622
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重复经颅磁刺激治疗轻度认知障碍的临床试验
背景:轻度认知障碍(MCI)被定义为进行性记忆功能障碍。关于重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)是否可以改善这种情况,存在争议。方法:在一项随机、自我控制、交叉临床试验中,评估rTMS对轻度认知障碍患者认知表现的影响。将患者随机分为A、B两组,依次接受rTMS治疗和假治疗,每组8周。蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)测试作为认知电池在基线和每8周干预后1周进行。结果:16例患者入组。两组间MoCA基线值差异无统计学意义(P值= 0.10)。随访9周时,A组MoCA平均评分较B组(P值< 0.001)及其基线均显著升高(P值= 0.01)。然而,在18周的随访中,两组的平均MoCA评分均较基线升高(P值均< 0.001),两组间无显著差异(P值= 0.87)。无不良反应报告。结论:rTMS是一种有效且安全的治疗MCI患者认知改善的方法。J Neurol Res. 2020;000(000):000-000 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jnr622
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Non-Invasive Neuromodulation for Episodic and Chronic Migraine Headache: Preliminary Findings on Feasibility of At-Home Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation With Remote Supervision Effectiveness of Relaxation and Respiratory Exercise on Sleep Quality, Depression and Spasticity in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients: Preliminary Findings Neuro-Abilities and a Good Life Small Number of Coils With Extended Length in the Endovascular Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysm: Experience of 108 Cases in a Single-Center Motor Neuron Disease-Frontotemporal Dementia Spectrum Disorder: A Different Phenotype Related With a Novel TBK1 Gene Variant
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1