Teodisee vraagstuk in Job as uitdaging aan die grense tussen samelewing(rein) en wildernis (onrein)

H. G. Pistorius, D. Human
{"title":"Teodisee vraagstuk in Job as uitdaging aan die grense tussen samelewing(rein) en wildernis (onrein)","authors":"H. G. Pistorius, D. Human","doi":"10.5952/55-3-4-664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The question regarding theodicy in Job as a challenge in\n regard to the borders between society and wilderness This article\n focuses on the first divine speech in Job (38-39:33). In this regard the first divine speech\n serves as polemics against the ruling Zeitgeist in post-exilic Israel. A message of hope, that\n urges Israel to focus her attention on the one sovereign God sprouts forth from it, morphing the\n first divine speech into a radical message of cultic and religious encouragement. The animals\n listed in Job 38-39:33 show similarities when their habitat is taken into account. Habitat\n outside of society and death as a conceptual location is linked to each other in various ways.\n The article attempts to show that concepts such as being clean or unclean is created through\n cultural processes of thought that links being clean with cosmic order and the presence of God.\n Cultic cleanness is linked with ‘society’. The antitheses of ‘society’ is ‘wilderness’. In Job\n 38-41 God cares for animals that live in the ‘wilderness’. The negative associations that Israel\n have towards ‘wilderness’ now stands in direct contrast towards God’s love and care. \n In this regard Israel’s perception of true cleanness and uncleanness is placed in the spotlight.\n Clean, unclean and right and wrong seems to be redefined and God claims authority over it all.\n Suffering, deserved or not and our negative feelings towards suffering is redefined, seeing that\n what we once thought was wrong and had negative feelings towards, just like uncleanness, now\n seems to be a part of the one sovereign God.","PeriodicalId":18902,"journal":{"name":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5952/55-3-4-664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The question regarding theodicy in Job as a challenge in regard to the borders between society and wilderness This article focuses on the first divine speech in Job (38-39:33). In this regard the first divine speech serves as polemics against the ruling Zeitgeist in post-exilic Israel. A message of hope, that urges Israel to focus her attention on the one sovereign God sprouts forth from it, morphing the first divine speech into a radical message of cultic and religious encouragement. The animals listed in Job 38-39:33 show similarities when their habitat is taken into account. Habitat outside of society and death as a conceptual location is linked to each other in various ways. The article attempts to show that concepts such as being clean or unclean is created through cultural processes of thought that links being clean with cosmic order and the presence of God. Cultic cleanness is linked with ‘society’. The antitheses of ‘society’ is ‘wilderness’. In Job 38-41 God cares for animals that live in the ‘wilderness’. The negative associations that Israel have towards ‘wilderness’ now stands in direct contrast towards God’s love and care. In this regard Israel’s perception of true cleanness and uncleanness is placed in the spotlight. Clean, unclean and right and wrong seems to be redefined and God claims authority over it all. Suffering, deserved or not and our negative feelings towards suffering is redefined, seeing that what we once thought was wrong and had negative feelings towards, just like uncleanness, now seems to be a part of the one sovereign God.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于《约伯记》中的神正论是对社会与荒野之间界限的挑战,这篇文章的重点是《约伯记》中第一次神的讲话(38-39:33)。在这方面,第一次神圣的演讲是对后流放的以色列统治时代精神的辩论。一个希望的信息,促使以色列把她的注意力集中在一个至高无上的上帝上,从它发芽,把第一个神圣的演讲变成了一个激进的邪教和宗教鼓励的信息。约伯记38-39:33中列出的动物如果考虑到它们的栖息地,就会显示出相似之处。社会之外的栖息地和死亡作为一个概念位置以各种方式相互联系。这篇文章试图表明,诸如清洁或不清洁之类的概念是通过思想的文化过程创造出来的,这种文化过程将清洁与宇宙秩序和上帝的存在联系起来。邪教清洁与“社会”有关。“社会”的反义词是“荒野”。在约伯记38-41章中,上帝照顾生活在“旷野”的动物。以色列人对“旷野”的负面联想现在与上帝的爱和关怀形成了直接的对比。在这方面,以色列对真正的洁净和不洁净的看法被置于聚光灯下。洁净,不洁净,对与错似乎都被重新定义了,上帝声称对这一切都有权威。痛苦,罪有应得与否,我们对痛苦的负面感受都被重新定义,我们曾经认为是错误的,对它有负面感受,就像不洁净一样,现在似乎是至高无上的上帝的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Power games: Using Foucault to shed light on the inherent power dynamics of intercultural Bible study groups. Discussion of a qualitative research project The rising prominence of John Owen: A research article of “The Ashgate Research Companion to John Owen’s Theology” Alle kaarte op die preek “Rise up and walk” : tracing the trajectory of the Carnegie discourse and plotting a way forward The relevance of Galatians 5:16-26 in the modern "spiritual intelligence" debate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1