Nurse practitioners in Australian emergency departments

Toni G McCallum Pardey (Issue Editor)
{"title":"Nurse practitioners in Australian emergency departments","authors":"Toni G McCallum Pardey (Issue Editor)","doi":"10.1016/S1328-2743(05)80024-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With most of 2004 behind us the Nurse Practitioner (NP) movement continues to gain momentum. Several emergency departments throughout the country have now employed Emergency NPs or transitional Emergency NPs (a registered nurse who is currently seeking authorisation). While NSW leads the way in the number of authorised NPs, the other states and territories are at various stages along the path to their widespread implementation. However, each state or territory has taken a slightly different approach to NPs, with different authorisation processes, different educational requirements, different prescribing regulations, and different scopes of practice. Once authorised as an NP in one Australian state or territory, the NP should automatically be granted reciprocal authorisation in any other Australian state or territory, just as registration as a nurse is reciprocal, although this is yet to be tested.</p><p>Those who thought the fight to implement NPs into the Australian health care workforce was over should think again. It is not enough just to employ NPs, full support of the concept is also required. This means NPs must receive adequate support, adequate resources, adequate office space and equipment, adequate non-clinical time, and adequate educational opportunities.</p><p>It is essential that the issue of uniform standards of practice be addressed at a national level. The following National Nursing Organisation consensus statements is supported by the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100148,"journal":{"name":"Australian Emergency Nursing Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1328-2743(05)80024-0","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Emergency Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1328274305800240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

With most of 2004 behind us the Nurse Practitioner (NP) movement continues to gain momentum. Several emergency departments throughout the country have now employed Emergency NPs or transitional Emergency NPs (a registered nurse who is currently seeking authorisation). While NSW leads the way in the number of authorised NPs, the other states and territories are at various stages along the path to their widespread implementation. However, each state or territory has taken a slightly different approach to NPs, with different authorisation processes, different educational requirements, different prescribing regulations, and different scopes of practice. Once authorised as an NP in one Australian state or territory, the NP should automatically be granted reciprocal authorisation in any other Australian state or territory, just as registration as a nurse is reciprocal, although this is yet to be tested.

Those who thought the fight to implement NPs into the Australian health care workforce was over should think again. It is not enough just to employ NPs, full support of the concept is also required. This means NPs must receive adequate support, adequate resources, adequate office space and equipment, adequate non-clinical time, and adequate educational opportunities.

It is essential that the issue of uniform standards of practice be addressed at a national level. The following National Nursing Organisation consensus statements is supported by the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚急诊科执业护士
随着2004年大部分时间的过去,执业护士(NP)运动继续获得动力。全国各地的几个急诊科现在聘用了紧急护士或过渡性紧急护士(目前正在申请授权的注册护士)。虽然新南威尔士州在批准的国家行动计划数量方面处于领先地位,但其他州和地区在广泛实施国家行动计划的道路上处于不同阶段。然而,每个州或地区对NPs采取的方法略有不同,有不同的授权程序、不同的教育要求、不同的处方法规和不同的实践范围。一旦在澳大利亚的一个州或地区被授权为NP, NP应该自动获得在任何其他澳大利亚州或地区的互惠授权,就像护士注册是互惠的一样,尽管这还有待测试。那些认为在澳大利亚卫生保健队伍中实施新计划的斗争已经结束的人应该重新考虑一下。仅仅雇用国家行动纲领是不够的,还需要充分支持这一概念。这意味着NPs必须得到足够的支持、足够的资源、足够的办公空间和设备、足够的非临床时间和足够的教育机会。必须在国家一级处理统一的做法标准问题。以下国家护理组织的共识声明得到了澳大利亚政府卫生和老龄化部的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Do they really listen up there? Communication between the ED and nursing executive Aviation nursing — it is different Emergency nursing on the edge — the challenges of remote area nursing Is the ATS in need of up triaging? Advancing practice — from innovation to implementation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1