Monopolistic Screening Under Mental Accounting: Applications to Loan Markets with Collateral

IF 0.9 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Review of Network Economics Pub Date : 2023-07-14 DOI:10.1515/rne-2023-0030
Byung-Cheol Kim
{"title":"Monopolistic Screening Under Mental Accounting: Applications to Loan Markets with Collateral","authors":"Byung-Cheol Kim","doi":"10.1515/rne-2023-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper extends the standard model of monopolistic screening to allow for some consumers who engage in narrow framing, a prominent behavioral bias of mental accounting. Narrow framing generates a bias toward high quality-price ratios, which induces even high-type consumers to choose a menu that targets low-type consumers. To strategically account for narrow framing, when the monopolist induces the high-type consumers to stay with the more expensive menu, there arises a downward quality distortion even at the top and a smaller downward distortion at the bottom. Then, we apply this model to optimal loan contracts to screen heterogeneous borrowers with different default risks. We find that the lender optimally reduces the collateral requirement for low-risk borrowers when some high-risk borrowers are subject to narrow framing. This result empirically implies that narrow framing may lead to smaller credit rationing and lower monitoring intensity in the lending markets.","PeriodicalId":45659,"journal":{"name":"Review of Network Economics","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Network Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/rne-2023-0030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper extends the standard model of monopolistic screening to allow for some consumers who engage in narrow framing, a prominent behavioral bias of mental accounting. Narrow framing generates a bias toward high quality-price ratios, which induces even high-type consumers to choose a menu that targets low-type consumers. To strategically account for narrow framing, when the monopolist induces the high-type consumers to stay with the more expensive menu, there arises a downward quality distortion even at the top and a smaller downward distortion at the bottom. Then, we apply this model to optimal loan contracts to screen heterogeneous borrowers with different default risks. We find that the lender optimally reduces the collateral requirement for low-risk borrowers when some high-risk borrowers are subject to narrow framing. This result empirically implies that narrow framing may lead to smaller credit rationing and lower monitoring intensity in the lending markets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心理会计下的垄断筛选:在有担保的贷款市场中的应用
摘要本文扩展了垄断筛选的标准模型,以允许一些消费者参与窄框架,这是心理会计的一种突出的行为偏见。狭窄的框架产生了对高质量-价格比的偏好,这导致即使是高类型的消费者也会选择针对低类型消费者的菜单。为了从战略上解释窄框架,当垄断者诱导高类型消费者继续使用更昂贵的菜单时,即使在顶部也会出现向下的质量扭曲,在底部也会出现较小的向下扭曲。然后,我们将该模型应用于最优贷款合同,以筛选具有不同违约风险的异质借款人。我们发现,当一些高风险借款人受到窄框架约束时,贷款人最优地降低了低风险借款人的抵押品要求。这一结果在实证上表明,窄框架可能导致贷款市场的信贷配给较小,监管强度较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The Review of Network Economics seeks to help policy makers, academics, and practitioners keep informed of new research and policy debate in network economics and related subjects that are relevant to the study of network industries. By publishing high quality research on topical issues relevant to network industries, it is hoped readers will be able to gain a deeper understanding of the economic issues involved and that this will improve the quality of decision making by private and public organisations, and debate among researchers. The articles can cover specific network industries, or may deal with general issues that have relevance to a number of different network industries, including topics in the economics of networks, regulation, competition law, or industrial organisation. Papers that provide insights into policy debates are especially welcome, as are up-to-date surveys, book reviews, and comments.
期刊最新文献
Reform, Not Revolution, is What is Needed Now for Yardstick Competition The Quality of Interactions in Competition Between Social Media Platforms Mixed Bundling and Mergers Price-Cap Regulation of Firms That Supply Their Rivals A Signaling Theory of the Online Consumer Review Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1