Analysis of Movements in Spinal Cord Hemisection Treatment with Amniotic Membrane – Preclinical Study

M. F. Neves, J. R. Fonseca, P. Carvalho, A. C. Pereira, E. H. P. Polisel, S. M. P. Pröglhöf, L. B. Sant´Anna, M. O. Lima, E. Arisawa
{"title":"Analysis of Movements in Spinal Cord Hemisection Treatment with Amniotic Membrane – Preclinical Study","authors":"M. F. Neves, J. R. Fonseca, P. Carvalho, A. C. Pereira, E. H. P. Polisel, S. M. P. Pröglhöf, L. B. Sant´Anna, M. O. Lima, E. Arisawa","doi":"10.9734/ajopacs/2022/v10i130148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Amniotic Membrane application in rats with Spinal Cord Injury induced by transverse hemisection using kinematic analysis and Sciatic Functional Index. \nStudy design: True experimental research design. \nPlace and Duration of Study: Instiuto de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento (IP&D) of Universidade do Vale do Paraíba (UNIVAP), between September 2016 and December 2017. \nMethodology: Fifteen adult male rats were used, allocated into three equal groups: Control (the spinal cord injury and Amniotic Membrane application were simulated), Lesion (spinal cord injury not treated), Amniotic membrane (spinal cord injury treated by amniotic membrane). All animals underwent surgical procedures. A transverse hemisection was performed in groups Lesion and Amniotic Membrene. A fragment of the biomaterial was applied in group AM covering the hemisection area. \nResults: Sciatic Functional Index and motion analysis were performed by comparing images taken at pre- and postoperative time at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days. The kinematic analysis showed a significant difference between groups Control and Lesion at 7 days (p = 0.023) and 14 days (p = 0.015), and between groups Lesion and Amniotic Membrane at 14 days (p = 0.039), comparing the postoperative periods. The Sciatic Functional Index revealed significant differences between Groups Control and Lesion at 7 (p = -0.002), 14 (p = 0.003), and 21 days (p = 0.009), between Groups Control and Amniotic Membrane at 7 (p = 0.014), 14 (p = 0.007), and 28 days (p = 0; 013), and between Groups Lesion and Amniotic Membrane only at 14 days (p = 0.039). \nConclusion: Application of amniotic membrane in spinal cord hemisection in rats induced gait recovery and improvement in SFI compared to the untreated group.","PeriodicalId":8541,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Physical and Chemical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Physical and Chemical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajopacs/2022/v10i130148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Amniotic Membrane application in rats with Spinal Cord Injury induced by transverse hemisection using kinematic analysis and Sciatic Functional Index. Study design: True experimental research design. Place and Duration of Study: Instiuto de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento (IP&D) of Universidade do Vale do Paraíba (UNIVAP), between September 2016 and December 2017. Methodology: Fifteen adult male rats were used, allocated into three equal groups: Control (the spinal cord injury and Amniotic Membrane application were simulated), Lesion (spinal cord injury not treated), Amniotic membrane (spinal cord injury treated by amniotic membrane). All animals underwent surgical procedures. A transverse hemisection was performed in groups Lesion and Amniotic Membrene. A fragment of the biomaterial was applied in group AM covering the hemisection area. Results: Sciatic Functional Index and motion analysis were performed by comparing images taken at pre- and postoperative time at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days. The kinematic analysis showed a significant difference between groups Control and Lesion at 7 days (p = 0.023) and 14 days (p = 0.015), and between groups Lesion and Amniotic Membrane at 14 days (p = 0.039), comparing the postoperative periods. The Sciatic Functional Index revealed significant differences between Groups Control and Lesion at 7 (p = -0.002), 14 (p = 0.003), and 21 days (p = 0.009), between Groups Control and Amniotic Membrane at 7 (p = 0.014), 14 (p = 0.007), and 28 days (p = 0; 013), and between Groups Lesion and Amniotic Membrane only at 14 days (p = 0.039). Conclusion: Application of amniotic membrane in spinal cord hemisection in rats induced gait recovery and improvement in SFI compared to the untreated group.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
羊膜治疗脊髓半切术的运动分析-临床前研究
目的:通过运动学分析和坐骨功能指数,探讨羊膜在大鼠横断半切脊髓损伤中的应用效果。研究设计:真正的实验研究设计。学习地点和时间:2016年9月至2017年12月,valade university do Vale Paraíba (UNIVAP) Desenvolvimento (IP&D)研究所。方法:选取成年雄性大鼠15只,随机分为对照组(模拟脊髓损伤和羊膜的应用)、病变组(未处理脊髓损伤)、羊膜组(羊膜处理脊髓损伤)。所有的动物都接受了外科手术。病变组和羊膜组分别行横切面半切。在AM组中应用生物材料的片段覆盖半切片区域。结果:通过比较术后7、14、21和28天的图像,进行坐骨功能指数和运动分析。运动学分析显示,对照组和病变组在术后7天(p = 0.023)和14天(p = 0.015),病变组和羊膜组在术后14天(p = 0.039)差异有统计学意义。对照组与羊膜组的坐骨功能指数在7 (p = -0.002)、14 (p = 0.003)和21天(p = 0.009),对照组与羊膜组的坐骨功能指数在7 (p = 0.014)、14 (p = 0.007)和28天(p = 0;病变组与羊膜组仅在14 d时存在差异(p = 0.039)。结论:与未治疗组相比,羊膜在脊髓半切术中的应用可使大鼠SFI的步态恢复和改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Extraction, Evaluation, and Formulation of Hyptis capitata Jacq. (Burunganon) Flower Crude Extract as Bactericidal Ointment Determination of the Sulfur Content of Gasoline from Four Major Fuel Distributors in Dakar Dynamics of Planets and Other Celestial Bodies Proximate, Phytochemical and Gas Chromatography-mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) Analysis of the Carbonated Drink (Soft drink) Extract of Enantia chlorantha Stem Bark Realization and Experimental Study of a Forced Convection Solar Dryer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1