Building Civic Capacity: The History and Landscape of NYC Integration Activism, 2012–2021

Mira Debs, M. Makris, E. Castillo, Alexander Rodriguez, Ayana Smith, Joseph Ingall
{"title":"Building Civic Capacity: The History and Landscape of NYC Integration Activism, 2012–2021","authors":"Mira Debs, M. Makris, E. Castillo, Alexander Rodriguez, Ayana Smith, Joseph Ingall","doi":"10.1177/01614681221111426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: New York City is one of the most segregated school districts in the country, but between 2012 and 2021, school integration moved from a marginal to a central education policy. Existing narratives have emphasized the efforts of parents and school and political leaders, with less attention given to the significance of citywide coalitions of activists, especially youth activists. Purpose: We examine how grassroots activists contributed to advancing school integration policy, and the opportunities and challenges that resulted, through urban regime theory, and specifically civic capacity, which highlights how various constituencies build a shared agenda for policy change. Research Design: Working in partnership with four youth interviewers at two integration activist organizations, we conducted 72 semi-structured interviews with New York City student, parent, and community activists. We also observed 36 hours of public meeting observations and collected publicly available documents, including 360 newspaper articles and policy documents, to triangulate our findings. Conclusions: We found that activist coalitions made progress in developing civic capacity through increased collaboration among diverse stakeholders, notably youth, toward a shared definition of integration. However, growing tensions with rival coalitions and the fragmented political landscape of NYC limited the strength and durability of civic capacity.","PeriodicalId":22248,"journal":{"name":"Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681221111426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: New York City is one of the most segregated school districts in the country, but between 2012 and 2021, school integration moved from a marginal to a central education policy. Existing narratives have emphasized the efforts of parents and school and political leaders, with less attention given to the significance of citywide coalitions of activists, especially youth activists. Purpose: We examine how grassroots activists contributed to advancing school integration policy, and the opportunities and challenges that resulted, through urban regime theory, and specifically civic capacity, which highlights how various constituencies build a shared agenda for policy change. Research Design: Working in partnership with four youth interviewers at two integration activist organizations, we conducted 72 semi-structured interviews with New York City student, parent, and community activists. We also observed 36 hours of public meeting observations and collected publicly available documents, including 360 newspaper articles and policy documents, to triangulate our findings. Conclusions: We found that activist coalitions made progress in developing civic capacity through increased collaboration among diverse stakeholders, notably youth, toward a shared definition of integration. However, growing tensions with rival coalitions and the fragmented political landscape of NYC limited the strength and durability of civic capacity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公民能力建设:纽约融合运动的历史与景观,2012-2021
背景:纽约市是美国种族隔离最严重的学区之一,但在2012年至2021年间,学校融合从边缘教育政策转变为核心教育政策。现有的叙述强调的是家长、学校和政治领导人的努力,而很少关注全市范围内的活动人士联盟,尤其是青年活动人士的重要性。目的:我们通过城市制度理论,特别是公民能力,研究基层活动家如何为推进学校整合政策做出贡献,以及由此带来的机遇和挑战,这突出了不同选区如何建立政策变革的共同议程。研究设计:我们与两家融合活动组织的四位青年采访者合作,对纽约市的学生、家长和社区活动人士进行了72次半结构化访谈。我们还观察了36小时的公众会议观察,并收集了公开可用的文件,包括360篇报纸文章和政策文件,以三角测量我们的发现。结论:我们发现,通过加强不同利益相关者(尤其是年轻人)之间的合作,积极分子联盟在发展公民能力方面取得了进展,从而实现了对融合的共同定义。然而,与敌对联盟之间日益紧张的关系,以及纽约市支离破碎的政治格局,限制了公民能力的力量和持久性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pride Flags in Public Schools: Evolving Legal Issues to Consider “It’s Going to Go Beyond These Walls”: Toward a More Expansive Vision of Civic Learning Taking Seriously Campus Debates Surrounding Invited Speakers: Open-Mindedness and the Ethics of Inquiry in Higher Education From a Spark, a Mighty Flame: How Germinal Networks Support Teachers of Color to Promote Change in Activist Organizations and Beyond Avenues for Engagement? Testing the Democratic Nature of Library Book Challenge Processes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1