Effective Use of Percutaneous Stellate Ganglion Blockade in Patients With Electrical Storm.

Ying Tian, E. Wittwer, S. Kapa, Christopher J. McLeod, P. Xiao, P. Noseworthy, S. Mulpuru, A. Deshmukh, Hon-chi Lee, M. Ackerman, S. Asirvatham, T. Munger, Xingpeng Liu, P. Friedman, Y. Cha
{"title":"Effective Use of Percutaneous Stellate Ganglion Blockade in Patients With Electrical Storm.","authors":"Ying Tian, E. Wittwer, S. Kapa, Christopher J. McLeod, P. Xiao, P. Noseworthy, S. Mulpuru, A. Deshmukh, Hon-chi Lee, M. Ackerman, S. Asirvatham, T. Munger, Xingpeng Liu, P. Friedman, Y. Cha","doi":"10.1161/CIRCEP.118.007118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nPercutaneous stellate ganglion blockade (SGB) has been used for drug-refractory electrical storm due to ventricular arrhythmia (VA); however, the effects and long-term outcomes have not been well studied.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis study included 30 consecutive patients who had drug-refractory electrical storm and underwent percutaneous SGB between October 1, 2013, and March 31, 2018. Bupivacaine, alone or combined with lidocaine, was injected into the neck with good local anesthetic spread in the vicinity of the left stellate ganglion (n=15) or both stellate ganglia (n=15). Data were collected for patient clinical characteristics, immediate and long-term outcomes, and procedure-related complications.\n\n\nRESULTS\nClinical characteristics included age, 58±14 years; men, 73.3%; and left ventricular ejection fraction, 34±16%. At 24 hours, 60% of patients were free of VA. Patients whose VA was controlled had a lower hospital mortality rate than patients whose VA continued (5.6% versus 50.0%; P=0.009). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator interrogation showed a significant 92% reduction in VA episodes from 26±41 to 2±4 in the 72 hours after SGB (P<0.001). Patients who died during the same hospitalization (n=7) were more likely to have ischemic cardiomyopathy (100% versus 43.5%; P=0.03) and recurrent VA within 24 hours (85.7% versus 26.1%; P=0.009). There were no procedure-related major complications.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nSGB effectively attenuated electrical storm in more than half of patients without procedure-related complications. Percutaneous SGB may be considered for stabilizing ventricular rhythm in patients for whom other therapies have failed.","PeriodicalId":10167,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"56","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.118.007118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

Abstract

BACKGROUND Percutaneous stellate ganglion blockade (SGB) has been used for drug-refractory electrical storm due to ventricular arrhythmia (VA); however, the effects and long-term outcomes have not been well studied. METHODS This study included 30 consecutive patients who had drug-refractory electrical storm and underwent percutaneous SGB between October 1, 2013, and March 31, 2018. Bupivacaine, alone or combined with lidocaine, was injected into the neck with good local anesthetic spread in the vicinity of the left stellate ganglion (n=15) or both stellate ganglia (n=15). Data were collected for patient clinical characteristics, immediate and long-term outcomes, and procedure-related complications. RESULTS Clinical characteristics included age, 58±14 years; men, 73.3%; and left ventricular ejection fraction, 34±16%. At 24 hours, 60% of patients were free of VA. Patients whose VA was controlled had a lower hospital mortality rate than patients whose VA continued (5.6% versus 50.0%; P=0.009). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator interrogation showed a significant 92% reduction in VA episodes from 26±41 to 2±4 in the 72 hours after SGB (P<0.001). Patients who died during the same hospitalization (n=7) were more likely to have ischemic cardiomyopathy (100% versus 43.5%; P=0.03) and recurrent VA within 24 hours (85.7% versus 26.1%; P=0.009). There were no procedure-related major complications. CONCLUSIONS SGB effectively attenuated electrical storm in more than half of patients without procedure-related complications. Percutaneous SGB may be considered for stabilizing ventricular rhythm in patients for whom other therapies have failed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮星状神经节阻滞治疗电风暴患者的疗效。
背景:经皮星状神经节阻滞(SGB)已被用于治疗室性心律失常(VA)引起的药物难治性电风暴;然而,其影响和长期结果尚未得到很好的研究。方法本研究纳入了2013年10月1日至2018年3月31日期间连续30例难治性电风暴患者经皮SGB。布比卡因单用或联用利多卡因颈部注射,局部麻醉良好,分布于左侧星状神经节附近(n=15)或双侧星状神经节附近(n=15)。收集患者临床特征、近期和长期结果以及手术相关并发症的数据。结果年龄:58±14岁;男性,73.3%;左室射血分数,34±16%。在24小时内,60%的患者没有VA。VA得到控制的患者的医院死亡率低于VA继续存在的患者(5.6%对50.0%;P = 0.009)。植入式心律转复除颤器审讯显示,在SGB后72小时内,VA发作从26±41次减少到2±4次,显著减少92% (P<0.001)。在同一住院期间死亡的患者(n=7)患缺血性心肌病的可能性更大(100%比43.5%;P=0.03)和24小时内VA复发(85.7% vs 26.1%;P = 0.009)。无手术相关的主要并发症。结论ssgb有效地减弱了半数以上患者的电风暴,无手术相关并发症。经皮SGB可用于稳定其他治疗失败的患者的心室节律。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Coronary Sinus Metabolite 12,13-diHOME Is a Novel Biomarker for Left Atrial Remodeling in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Impact of Contact Force on Pulsed Field Ablation Outcomes Using Focal Point Catheter Characteristics of Right-Sided Accessory Pathways Associated With Right Cardiac Veins Prognostic Impact of Sinus Rhythm in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: Separating Rhythm Outcomes From Randomized Strategy Findings From the CABANA Trial Trends Favoring an Anatomical Approach to Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias Originating From the Left Ventricular Summit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1