An investigation of ventilation control strategies for louver windows in different climate zones

IF 1.1 4区 工程技术 Q3 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY International Journal of Ventilation Pub Date : 2020-06-30 DOI:10.1080/14733315.2020.1777018
L. Scheuring, B. Weller
{"title":"An investigation of ventilation control strategies for louver windows in different climate zones","authors":"L. Scheuring, B. Weller","doi":"10.1080/14733315.2020.1777018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Guaranteeing high indoor air quality and high degree of usersatisfaction at the same time is one of the challenges when improving the energy efficiency, namely the energy consumption, of a building. Current non-residential buildings mainly use mechanical ventilation systems to ensure high air quality. Natural ventilation can be an alternative regarding to lower maintenance costs and the psychological feeling of fresh air. Present natural ventilated buildings pose the risk of higher energy demand and less indoor air quality due to user’s behaviour. Controlled natural ventilation based on indoor CO2 concentration and room air temperature is needed. However, the energy efficiency of a control strategy highly depends on climate zone and control parameters. This paper aims to explore the impact of different control strategies on the energy efficiency of an operable louver window. The analyses are done for yearly results and then for each month individual to clarify the effect of monthly varying control strategies. For the analysis EnergyPlus as a building energy simulation tool and for the natural ventilation in specific the EnergyPlus Design Flow Rate method is used. In the simulation four window opening strategies based on CO2 concentration and one simple intake/exhaust mechanical ventilation system were tested in Mediterranean, subtropical and moderate climate zone. The highest impact on energy efficiency and thermal comfort was seen at the cold months in the moderate climate. Long window opening strategies cannot be implemented because of a high thermal discomfort. In the hot months in the Mediterranean and subtropical climate an impact of ventilation strategies are seen as well. Only at moderate conditions no major differences in the natural ventilation strategies were observed. When comparing the natural ventilation conditions to mechanical ventilation major differences were found. In almost all climate conditions natural ventilation outperformed the mechanical ventilation. Only in winter months in the moderate climate mechanical ventilation outperforms natural ventilation.","PeriodicalId":55613,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Ventilation","volume":"52 1","pages":"226 - 235"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Ventilation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14733315.2020.1777018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Abstract Guaranteeing high indoor air quality and high degree of usersatisfaction at the same time is one of the challenges when improving the energy efficiency, namely the energy consumption, of a building. Current non-residential buildings mainly use mechanical ventilation systems to ensure high air quality. Natural ventilation can be an alternative regarding to lower maintenance costs and the psychological feeling of fresh air. Present natural ventilated buildings pose the risk of higher energy demand and less indoor air quality due to user’s behaviour. Controlled natural ventilation based on indoor CO2 concentration and room air temperature is needed. However, the energy efficiency of a control strategy highly depends on climate zone and control parameters. This paper aims to explore the impact of different control strategies on the energy efficiency of an operable louver window. The analyses are done for yearly results and then for each month individual to clarify the effect of monthly varying control strategies. For the analysis EnergyPlus as a building energy simulation tool and for the natural ventilation in specific the EnergyPlus Design Flow Rate method is used. In the simulation four window opening strategies based on CO2 concentration and one simple intake/exhaust mechanical ventilation system were tested in Mediterranean, subtropical and moderate climate zone. The highest impact on energy efficiency and thermal comfort was seen at the cold months in the moderate climate. Long window opening strategies cannot be implemented because of a high thermal discomfort. In the hot months in the Mediterranean and subtropical climate an impact of ventilation strategies are seen as well. Only at moderate conditions no major differences in the natural ventilation strategies were observed. When comparing the natural ventilation conditions to mechanical ventilation major differences were found. In almost all climate conditions natural ventilation outperformed the mechanical ventilation. Only in winter months in the moderate climate mechanical ventilation outperforms natural ventilation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同气候区百叶窗通风控制策略研究
在保证高室内空气质量的同时保证用户的高满意度是提高建筑能源效率(即能耗)的挑战之一。目前的非住宅建筑主要采用机械通风系统来保证空气质量。自然通风可以降低维护成本和新鲜空气的心理感受。由于使用者的行为,目前自然通风的建筑物存在较高的能源需求和较差的室内空气质量的风险。需要根据室内CO2浓度和室内空气温度控制自然通风。然而,控制策略的能源效率在很大程度上取决于气候区和控制参数。本文旨在探讨不同的控制策略对可操作百叶窗能源效率的影响。对年度结果进行分析,然后对每个月的个体进行分析,以阐明每月不同控制策略的效果。在分析EnergyPlus作为建筑能源模拟工具的过程中,具体到自然通风,采用了EnergyPlus设计流率法。在模拟中,在地中海、亚热带和温和气候区分别测试了四种基于CO2浓度的开窗策略和一种简单的进排气机械通风系统。在温和气候的寒冷月份,对能源效率和热舒适的影响最大。由于高热不舒适感,不能实施长窗打开策略。在地中海和亚热带气候炎热的月份,通风策略也会产生影响。只有在中等条件下,自然通风策略没有观察到重大差异。将自然通风条件与机械通风条件进行比较,发现存在较大差异。在几乎所有气候条件下,自然通风都优于机械通风。只有在气候温和的冬季,机械通风的效果才优于自然通风。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Ventilation
International Journal of Ventilation CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
7
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This is a peer reviewed journal aimed at providing the latest information on research and application. Topics include: • New ideas concerned with the development or application of ventilation; • Validated case studies demonstrating the performance of ventilation strategies; • Information on needs and solutions for specific building types including: offices, dwellings, schools, hospitals, parking garages, urban buildings and recreational buildings etc; • Developments in numerical methods; • Measurement techniques; • Related issues in which the impact of ventilation plays an important role (e.g. the interaction of ventilation with air quality, health and comfort); • Energy issues related to ventilation (e.g. low energy systems, ventilation heating and cooling loss); • Driving forces (weather data, fan performance etc).
期刊最新文献
Assessing thermal resilience to overheating in a Belgian apartment: impact of building parameters Passive ventilation for building not subjected to solar radiation Experimental study on the periodic pulsating ventilation by fluidic oscillator on pollutant dispersion and ventilation performance in enclosed environment Compartmentalization and ventilation system impacts on air and contaminant transport for multifamily buildings Controllable baffle-type exhaust-hood in home kitchen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1