8.—A Stratigraphical Revision of the Old Red Sandstone of North-eastern Caithness

R. Donovan, Richard J. Foster, T. S. Westoll
{"title":"8.—A Stratigraphical Revision of the Old Red Sandstone of North-eastern Caithness","authors":"R. Donovan, Richard J. Foster, T. S. Westoll","doi":"10.1017/S0080456800015118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Synopsis The stratigraphy of the Old Red Sandstone between Latheron and Brough in north-eastern Caithness has been revised. Stratigraphical subdivision in this area is primarily based on variations in lithology but is supported by the recognition of distinct faunal assemblages. The terms Wick Flagstone and Thurso Flagstone are discarded both as Group and Formation names and in their place type sequences different from those given by the Survey are proposed on the basis of the more continuous exposure seen between Ellens Goe and Latheron in eastern Caithness and in the Ham/Scarfskerry area of northern Caithness. The revision has been facilitated by an analysis of the structure of the area which suggests that a variable c. east-west compression has been the dominant controlling factor in the development of the structure of Caithness. As a result of the revision the position of the Achanarras Fish Bed is now clear. The Passage Beds Group is no longer considered a meaningful subdivision as it is partly overlain by and partly overlies this Fish Bed. The John o' Groats Sandstone Group is thought to probably overlie the Caithness Flagstones conformably. The following major stratigraphical subdivisions are recognised: D. John o' Groats Sandstone Group. C. Upper Caithness Flagstone Group (c) Mey Subgroup (b) Ham-Scarfskerry Subgroup (a) Latheron Subgroup. B. Lower Caithness Flagstone Group (position of Achanarras Fish Bed) (d) Robbery Head Subgroup (c) Lybster Subgroup (b) Hillhead Red Bed Subgroup (a) Clyth Subgroup. A. Sarclet Group. A typographical device is used for formal description of formations and groups whose boundaries are truncated by faults.","PeriodicalId":23232,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1974-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"47","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080456800015118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

Abstract

Synopsis The stratigraphy of the Old Red Sandstone between Latheron and Brough in north-eastern Caithness has been revised. Stratigraphical subdivision in this area is primarily based on variations in lithology but is supported by the recognition of distinct faunal assemblages. The terms Wick Flagstone and Thurso Flagstone are discarded both as Group and Formation names and in their place type sequences different from those given by the Survey are proposed on the basis of the more continuous exposure seen between Ellens Goe and Latheron in eastern Caithness and in the Ham/Scarfskerry area of northern Caithness. The revision has been facilitated by an analysis of the structure of the area which suggests that a variable c. east-west compression has been the dominant controlling factor in the development of the structure of Caithness. As a result of the revision the position of the Achanarras Fish Bed is now clear. The Passage Beds Group is no longer considered a meaningful subdivision as it is partly overlain by and partly overlies this Fish Bed. The John o' Groats Sandstone Group is thought to probably overlie the Caithness Flagstones conformably. The following major stratigraphical subdivisions are recognised: D. John o' Groats Sandstone Group. C. Upper Caithness Flagstone Group (c) Mey Subgroup (b) Ham-Scarfskerry Subgroup (a) Latheron Subgroup. B. Lower Caithness Flagstone Group (position of Achanarras Fish Bed) (d) Robbery Head Subgroup (c) Lybster Subgroup (b) Hillhead Red Bed Subgroup (a) Clyth Subgroup. A. Sarclet Group. A typographical device is used for formal description of formations and groups whose boundaries are truncated by faults.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
8.东北凯斯尼斯古红砂岩的地层修正
对英国东北部Latheron - Brough古红砂岩地层进行了订正。该地区的地层划分主要基于岩性的变化,但也得到了对不同动物组合的认识的支持。Wick Flagstone和Thurso Flagstone这两个术语作为组名和组名都被抛弃了,它们的位置类型序列也与调查中给出的不同,这是基于凯斯内斯东部的Ellens Goe和Latheron以及凯斯内斯北部的Ham/ scarfskery地区之间更连续的暴露而提出的。对该地区构造的分析表明,一个可变的c.东西挤压是凯斯尼斯构造发展的主要控制因素,从而促进了对该地区构造的修正。由于修订的结果,阿查那拉斯鱼床的位置现在是明确的。通道床群不再被认为是一个有意义的细分,因为它部分覆盖在鱼床上,部分覆盖在鱼床上。John o' Groats砂岩群被认为可能整合在凯斯内斯石板之上。主要的地层划分如下:D. John o' Groats砂岩群。c .上Caithness Flagstone群(c) Mey亚群(b) ham - scarfskery亚群(a) Latheron亚群。b .下Caithness石板群(Achanarras鱼床位置)(d)抢劫案头亚群(c) Lybster亚群(b) Hillhead红床亚群(a) Clyth亚群。A. Sarclet集团。印刷设备用于对边界被断层截断的构造和组进行正式描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Croll, feedback mechanisms, climate change and the future Appendix Index Index XV.—On a New Family and Twelve New Species of Rotifera of the Order Bdelloida, collected by the Lake Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1