Methodological Poverty and Disciplinary Underdevelopment in IR

IF 0.7 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS All Azimuth-A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI:10.20991/ALLAZIMUTH.513139
E. Aydinli
{"title":"Methodological Poverty and Disciplinary Underdevelopment in IR","authors":"E. Aydinli","doi":"10.20991/ALLAZIMUTH.513139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This issue does not offer in-depth, step-by-step instructions on how to use the  methodologies and methods discussed, nor does it in any way claim to be an all-inclusive  exploration of methodologies in IR. Rather, it offers a look into 10 different methods and  methodologies used for conducting research in IR, from the behind-the-scenes perspectives  of scholars who have actually used them in their own work. In their articles, the authors  in this issue provide background information on the method or methodology in question,  including its history, primary questions it has been used to answer, and any major research  programs and projects associated with it. They then share frank and honest insights into  their own personal histories with the methods and methodologies: how did they decide to  use them, what alternatives did they consider, what kinds of training did they receive and  what kinds of obstacles did they face during that training? Finally, the authors explore their  application of the method or methodology with respect to their current or past research, and  why they found it the most appropriate for the research question(s) being asked.","PeriodicalId":51976,"journal":{"name":"All Azimuth-A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"All Azimuth-A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20991/ALLAZIMUTH.513139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This issue does not offer in-depth, step-by-step instructions on how to use the  methodologies and methods discussed, nor does it in any way claim to be an all-inclusive  exploration of methodologies in IR. Rather, it offers a look into 10 different methods and  methodologies used for conducting research in IR, from the behind-the-scenes perspectives  of scholars who have actually used them in their own work. In their articles, the authors  in this issue provide background information on the method or methodology in question,  including its history, primary questions it has been used to answer, and any major research  programs and projects associated with it. They then share frank and honest insights into  their own personal histories with the methods and methodologies: how did they decide to  use them, what alternatives did they consider, what kinds of training did they receive and  what kinds of obstacles did they face during that training? Finally, the authors explore their  application of the method or methodology with respect to their current or past research, and  why they found it the most appropriate for the research question(s) being asked.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际关系的方法贫困与学科欠发达
本问题不提供关于如何使用所讨论的方法和方法的深入、分步说明,也不以任何方式声称是对IR方法的全面探索。相反,它提供了10种不同的方法和方法论,用于开展国际关系研究,从幕后的角度来看,学者们在自己的工作中实际使用它们。在他们的文章中,作者提供了有关方法或方法论的背景信息,包括它的历史,它被用来回答的主要问题,以及与之相关的任何主要研究计划和项目。然后,他们会坦率而诚实地分享自己对这些方法和方法论的个人历史的见解:他们是如何决定使用这些方法的,他们考虑了哪些替代方案,他们接受了什么样的培训,以及他们在培训期间遇到了什么样的障碍?最后,作者探讨了他们的方法或方法论的应用,相对于他们当前或过去的研究,以及为什么他们发现它最适合的研究问题(s)被问到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
30.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: All Azimuth is a bi-annual journal that provides a forum for academic studies on foreign policy analysis and peace research as well as theoretically-oriented policy pieces on international issues. We particularly welcome research on the nexus of peace, security, and development. We aim to publish pieces bridging the theory-practice gap; dealing with under-represented conceptual approaches in the field; and engaging in scholarly dialogue between the “center” and the “periphery”. We strongly encourage, therefore, publications with homegrown theoretical and philosophical approaches. In this sense, All Azimuth aims to transcend conventional theoretical, methodological, geographical, academic and cultural boundaries. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial evaluation by the Editor. If found suitable for further consideration, manuscripts will be assessed through double-blind peer-review by independent, anonymous experts. All Azimuth is published by the Center for Foreign Policy and Peace Research, a non-profit and nonpartisan organization dedicated to helping develop agendas and promote policies that contribute to the peaceful resolution of international and inter-communal conflicts taking place particularly in the regions surrounding Turkey.
期刊最新文献
Turkish Foreign Policy Towards Central Asia: An Unfolding of Regionalism and Soft Power Quo Vadis, Turkish IR? Mapping Turkish IR’s Footsteps within the Global From Prescription to Treatment: The Disciplinary (under)Achievement of IR in Turkey Frozen in Time while Icebergs are Melting: Türkiye's Climate Policy Neo-Weberian Reading of Violent Non-State Actors: The Case of Hezbollah
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1