How do UK general practice staff understand and manage prediabetes? A focus group study

IF 2 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2022-05-06 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0166
E. Barry, T. Greenhalgh
{"title":"How do UK general practice staff understand and manage prediabetes? A focus group study","authors":"E. Barry, T. Greenhalgh","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Preventing type 2 diabetes is a national priority; one aspect is the identification and active management of ‘prediabetes’ through lifestyle change. Aim To explore what primary care clinicians understood by ‘prediabetes’, how they communicated this diagnosis to people, how they delivered lifestyle advice, and their views on barriers to lifestyle change. Design & setting Three focus groups were undertaken with 25 individuals from primary care teams (GPs, nurses, and healthcare assistants) in Newham, a deprived and ethnically diverse part of London, UK. Method Recordings were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically before integrating social and behavioural science theories. Results Focus groups participants described four main influences on their management of prediabetes in the consultation: social determinants, clinical aspects of diagnosis and management, patient motivation and behaviour change, and long-term care. Since most felt unable to address social determinants such as poverty, discussions with patients tended to focus on attempts to change individual behaviours and achieve particular numerical targets, with limited attention to the social context in which behaviours would play out. Conclusion Type two diabetes prevention efforts in general practice may fail to address the upstream causes of this disease. A narrow focus on numerical targets and decontextualised behaviours overlooks the social complexity of human behaviour and lifestyle choices. Within the consultation, the authors recommend that greater attention is paid to discussing the social context and meaning of particular behaviours. Beyond the consultation, collaboration between primary care clinicians, public health bodies, and local governments is required to address community-level constraints to behaviour change.","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background Preventing type 2 diabetes is a national priority; one aspect is the identification and active management of ‘prediabetes’ through lifestyle change. Aim To explore what primary care clinicians understood by ‘prediabetes’, how they communicated this diagnosis to people, how they delivered lifestyle advice, and their views on barriers to lifestyle change. Design & setting Three focus groups were undertaken with 25 individuals from primary care teams (GPs, nurses, and healthcare assistants) in Newham, a deprived and ethnically diverse part of London, UK. Method Recordings were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically before integrating social and behavioural science theories. Results Focus groups participants described four main influences on their management of prediabetes in the consultation: social determinants, clinical aspects of diagnosis and management, patient motivation and behaviour change, and long-term care. Since most felt unable to address social determinants such as poverty, discussions with patients tended to focus on attempts to change individual behaviours and achieve particular numerical targets, with limited attention to the social context in which behaviours would play out. Conclusion Type two diabetes prevention efforts in general practice may fail to address the upstream causes of this disease. A narrow focus on numerical targets and decontextualised behaviours overlooks the social complexity of human behaviour and lifestyle choices. Within the consultation, the authors recommend that greater attention is paid to discussing the social context and meaning of particular behaviours. Beyond the consultation, collaboration between primary care clinicians, public health bodies, and local governments is required to address community-level constraints to behaviour change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国全科医生如何理解和管理前驱糖尿病?焦点小组研究
预防2型糖尿病是国家优先事项;一个方面是通过改变生活方式来识别和积极管理“前驱糖尿病”。目的探讨初级保健临床医生对“前驱糖尿病”的理解,他们如何向人们传达这一诊断,他们如何提供生活方式建议,以及他们对改变生活方式障碍的看法。设计和设置在英国伦敦的一个贫困和种族多样化的地区,来自纽汉的初级保健团队(全科医生、护士和医疗助理)的25个人进行了三个焦点小组。方法将录音逐字抄录,结合社会和行为科学理论进行专题分析。结果焦点小组的参与者在会诊中描述了对他们前驱糖尿病管理的四个主要影响因素:社会决定因素、诊断和管理的临床方面、患者动机和行为改变以及长期护理。由于大多数人感到无法解决诸如贫困等社会决定因素,因此与患者的讨论往往侧重于改变个人行为和实现特定数字目标的尝试,而对行为将发挥作用的社会背景的关注有限。结论二型糖尿病预防工作在一般实践中可能无法解决本病的上游原因。狭隘地关注数字目标和脱离情境的行为,忽视了人类行为和生活方式选择的社会复杂性。在咨询中,作者建议更多地关注讨论特定行为的社会背景和意义。除了咨询之外,还需要初级保健临床医生、公共卫生机构和地方政府之间的合作,以解决社区层面对行为改变的制约因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Dispensing practices issue shorter prescription lengths compared with non-dispensing practices: a quasi-experimental cross-sectional study. Between-practice variation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnosis guideline compliance: an observational study. Older Chinese migrants' experiences of remote primary care in England: a semi-structured interview study. Use of unscheduled care in the last year of life for people with multiple long-term health conditions: a retrospective cohort study of 299 361 decedents. GPs' perspectives on patients presenting with endometriosis symptoms: an interview study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1