Towards fully automatic placement of security sanitizers and declassifiers

B. Livshits, Stephen Chong
{"title":"Towards fully automatic placement of security sanitizers and declassifiers","authors":"B. Livshits, Stephen Chong","doi":"10.1145/2429069.2429115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A great deal of research on sanitizer placement, sanitizer correctness, checking path validity, and policy inference, has been done in the last five to ten years, involving type systems, static analysis and runtime monitoring and enforcement. However, in pretty much all work thus far, the burden of sanitizer placement has fallen on the developer. However, sanitizer placement in large-scale applications is difficult, and developers are likely to make errors, and thus create security vulnerabilities.\n This paper advocates a radically different approach: we aim to fully automate the placement of sanitizers by analyzing the ow of tainted data in the program. We argue that developers are better off leaving out sanitizers entirely instead of trying to place them.\n This paper proposes a fully automatic technique for sanitizer placement. Placement is static whenever possible, switching to run time when necessary. Run-time taint tracking techniques can be used to track the source of a value, and thus apply appropriate sanitization. However, due to the runtime overhead of run-time taint tracking, our technique avoids it wherever possible.","PeriodicalId":20683,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"77","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2429069.2429115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 77

Abstract

A great deal of research on sanitizer placement, sanitizer correctness, checking path validity, and policy inference, has been done in the last five to ten years, involving type systems, static analysis and runtime monitoring and enforcement. However, in pretty much all work thus far, the burden of sanitizer placement has fallen on the developer. However, sanitizer placement in large-scale applications is difficult, and developers are likely to make errors, and thus create security vulnerabilities. This paper advocates a radically different approach: we aim to fully automate the placement of sanitizers by analyzing the ow of tainted data in the program. We argue that developers are better off leaving out sanitizers entirely instead of trying to place them. This paper proposes a fully automatic technique for sanitizer placement. Placement is static whenever possible, switching to run time when necessary. Run-time taint tracking techniques can be used to track the source of a value, and thus apply appropriate sanitization. However, due to the runtime overhead of run-time taint tracking, our technique avoids it wherever possible.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走向全自动放置安全杀毒器和解密器
在过去的五到十年中,已经完成了大量关于消毒液放置、消毒液正确性、检查路径有效性和策略推断的研究,涉及类型系统、静态分析和运行时监视和执行。然而,到目前为止,在几乎所有的工作中,消毒器放置的负担都落在了开发人员身上。然而,在大规模应用程序中放置杀毒程序是困难的,开发人员很可能会犯错误,从而产生安全漏洞。本文提倡一种完全不同的方法:我们的目标是通过分析程序中受污染数据的数量来完全自动化消毒程序的放置。我们认为开发者最好完全忽略杀菌剂,而不是试图放置它们。本文提出了一种全自动消毒剂放置技术。只要可能,位置都是静态的,必要时切换到运行时。运行时污染跟踪技术可用于跟踪值的来源,从而应用适当的清理。然而,由于运行时污染跟踪的运行时开销,我们的技术尽可能地避免了它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Session details: Verified systems Session details: Semantic models 2 Session details: Program analysis 3 Session details: Program analysis 1 Session details: Type system design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1