Prepubertal Impact of Protein Intake and Physical Activity on Weight-Bearing Peak Bone Mass and Strength in Males

T. Chevalley, J. Bonjour, M. Audet, F. Merminod, B. van Rietbergen, R. Rizzoli, S. Ferrari
{"title":"Prepubertal Impact of Protein Intake and Physical Activity on Weight-Bearing Peak Bone Mass and Strength in Males","authors":"T. Chevalley, J. Bonjour, M. Audet, F. Merminod, B. van Rietbergen, R. Rizzoli, S. Ferrari","doi":"10.1210/jc.2016-2449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context\nPeak bone mass (PBM) and strength are important determinants of fracture risk in later life. During growth, bone is responsive to changes in nutrition and physical activity (PA), particularly before pubertal maturation.\n\n\nObjective\nIn prepubertal healthy boys, protein intake (Prot-Int) enhances the impact of PA on weight-bearing bone. We hypothesized that the synergism between Prot-Int and PA on proximal femur as recorded at 7.4 years would track until PBM.\n\n\nMethods\nA total of 124 boys were followed from 7.4 to 15.2 and 22.6 years. At 7.4 years, they were dichotomized according to the median of both PA and Prot-Int.\n\n\nResults\nIn boys with PA greater than the median (310 vs 169 kcal ⋅ d-1), higher vs low Prot-Int (57.7 vs 38.0 g ⋅ d-1) was associated with +9.8% greater femoral neck (FN) bone mineral content (BMC) (P = 0.027) at 7.4 years. At 15.2 and 22.6 years, this difference was maintained: FN BMC: +12.7% (P = 0.012) and +11.3% (P = 0.016), respectively. With PA greater than the median, in Prot-Int greater than vs less than the median, differences in FN BMC z scores were +0.60, +0.70, and +0.68 at 7.4, 15.2, and 22.6 years, respectively. Microfinite element analysis of distal tibia at 15.2 and 22.6 years indicated that in the 2 groups with PA greater than the median, cross-sectional area, stiffness, and failure load were greater in Prot-Int greater than vs less than the median.\n\n\nConclusions\nThis study demonstrates the crucial influence of Prot-Int on the response to enhanced PA and the importance of prepubertal years for modifying the bone growth trajectory and, thereby, for achieving higher PBM and greater strength in healthy male participants.","PeriodicalId":22632,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":"7 1","pages":"157–166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-2449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Context Peak bone mass (PBM) and strength are important determinants of fracture risk in later life. During growth, bone is responsive to changes in nutrition and physical activity (PA), particularly before pubertal maturation. Objective In prepubertal healthy boys, protein intake (Prot-Int) enhances the impact of PA on weight-bearing bone. We hypothesized that the synergism between Prot-Int and PA on proximal femur as recorded at 7.4 years would track until PBM. Methods A total of 124 boys were followed from 7.4 to 15.2 and 22.6 years. At 7.4 years, they were dichotomized according to the median of both PA and Prot-Int. Results In boys with PA greater than the median (310 vs 169 kcal ⋅ d-1), higher vs low Prot-Int (57.7 vs 38.0 g ⋅ d-1) was associated with +9.8% greater femoral neck (FN) bone mineral content (BMC) (P = 0.027) at 7.4 years. At 15.2 and 22.6 years, this difference was maintained: FN BMC: +12.7% (P = 0.012) and +11.3% (P = 0.016), respectively. With PA greater than the median, in Prot-Int greater than vs less than the median, differences in FN BMC z scores were +0.60, +0.70, and +0.68 at 7.4, 15.2, and 22.6 years, respectively. Microfinite element analysis of distal tibia at 15.2 and 22.6 years indicated that in the 2 groups with PA greater than the median, cross-sectional area, stiffness, and failure load were greater in Prot-Int greater than vs less than the median. Conclusions This study demonstrates the crucial influence of Prot-Int on the response to enhanced PA and the importance of prepubertal years for modifying the bone growth trajectory and, thereby, for achieving higher PBM and greater strength in healthy male participants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青春期前蛋白质摄入和体力活动对男性负重峰值骨量和力量的影响
峰值骨量(PBM)和强度是晚年骨折风险的重要决定因素。在生长过程中,骨骼对营养和身体活动(PA)的变化做出反应,特别是在青春期成熟之前。目的在青春期前健康男孩中,蛋白质摄入(Prot-Int)可增强PA对负重骨的影响。我们假设在7.4岁时记录的股骨近端Prot-Int和PA之间的协同作用将持续到PBM。方法对124例男孩进行随访,随访年龄分别为7.4 ~ 15.2岁和22.6岁。在7.4岁时,根据PA和Prot-Int的中位数进行二分类。结果PA大于中位数(310 vs 169 kcal⋅d-1)的男孩,7.4岁时,高/低Prot-Int (57.7 vs 38.0 g⋅d-1)与股骨颈(FN)骨矿物质含量(BMC)增加+9.8% (P = 0.027)相关。在15.2岁和22.6岁时,这种差异保持不变:FN BMC分别为+12.7% (P = 0.012)和+11.3% (P = 0.016)。如果PA大于中位数,Prot-Int大于或小于中位数,在7.4、15.2和22.6年时,FN BMC z评分的差异分别为+0.60、+0.70和+0.68。在15.2岁和22.6岁时对胫骨远端进行的微有限元分析表明,在PA大于中位数的两组中,Prot-Int的横截面积、刚度和破坏载荷均大于中位数和小于中位数。结论:本研究证明了Prot-Int对PA增强反应的关键影响,以及青春期前年龄对改变骨骼生长轨迹的重要性,从而在健康男性参与者中获得更高的PBM和更大的力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of targeted therapy for radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer: a meta-analysis. Treatment Preferences in Patients with Hypothyroidism: an Analysis of Eleven Randomized Controlled Trials. Metabolomics: A Promising Tool in the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Obesity. Association between papillary thyroid cancer and primary aldosteronism in individuals with hypertension. The changing treatment paradigm in prolactinoma - a prospective series of 100 consecutive neurosurgical cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1