Kralj v kraljestvu zla: lik Kreonta v dramah Dominika Smoleta in Milana Uhdeta

IF 0.1 3区 文学 N/A LITERATURE, SLAVIC Primerjalna Knjizevnost Pub Date : 2021-05-02 DOI:10.3986/PKN.V44.I1.02
Alenka Jensterle Doležal
{"title":"Kralj v kraljestvu zla: lik Kreonta v dramah Dominika Smoleta in Milana Uhdeta","authors":"Alenka Jensterle Doležal","doi":"10.3986/PKN.V44.I1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The topic of the article is the comparison of two plays concerning the figure of King Creon: the paper focuses on the Slovenian poetic-philosophical play Antigona by Dominik Smole (1929–1992), which was produced by the Oder 57 in 1960, and the satirical-absurd play Děvka z města Theby (Prostitute from the City of Thebes) written in 1967 by the Czech playwright Milan Uhde (b. 1936). The latter was performed only for a short time in Czech National Theatre in Prague and Brno and was banned after 1968 because of the Soviet occupation and the new regime. Both plays were written in the same period. There is no real connection or possible influence between them, but still we can observe the same intertextual connections and philosophical ideas. Both follow Sophocles’s play, and both were deeply influenced by Anouilh’s Antigone. Both plays ground their philosophical perspectives in existentialism and absurdist theatre (these labels also appear in later analyses). This paper focuses on the figure of Creon, who in both plays becomes the main antagonist in the dramatic events revealing the discourse between the individual and the collective. His figure appears in the realm of evil and he puts Antigone’s action in question. His personality is marked by opposites and his actions express his inner conflict between obligations to the state and human choices. The figure of Creon is also interesting because of the political connotations in both dramas: his problem can be interpreted as the typical problem of a socialist ruler.","PeriodicalId":52032,"journal":{"name":"Primerjalna Knjizevnost","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primerjalna Knjizevnost","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3986/PKN.V44.I1.02","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LITERATURE, SLAVIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The topic of the article is the comparison of two plays concerning the figure of King Creon: the paper focuses on the Slovenian poetic-philosophical play Antigona by Dominik Smole (1929–1992), which was produced by the Oder 57 in 1960, and the satirical-absurd play Děvka z města Theby (Prostitute from the City of Thebes) written in 1967 by the Czech playwright Milan Uhde (b. 1936). The latter was performed only for a short time in Czech National Theatre in Prague and Brno and was banned after 1968 because of the Soviet occupation and the new regime. Both plays were written in the same period. There is no real connection or possible influence between them, but still we can observe the same intertextual connections and philosophical ideas. Both follow Sophocles’s play, and both were deeply influenced by Anouilh’s Antigone. Both plays ground their philosophical perspectives in existentialism and absurdist theatre (these labels also appear in later analyses). This paper focuses on the figure of Creon, who in both plays becomes the main antagonist in the dramatic events revealing the discourse between the individual and the collective. His figure appears in the realm of evil and he puts Antigone’s action in question. His personality is marked by opposites and his actions express his inner conflict between obligations to the state and human choices. The figure of Creon is also interesting because of the political connotations in both dramas: his problem can be interpreted as the typical problem of a socialist ruler.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本文的主题是两部关于克里翁国王形象的戏剧的比较:本文的重点是1960年由奥德57制作的多米尼克·斯莫雷(1929-1992)的诗哲学戏剧《安提戈娜》和捷克剧作家米兰·乌德(生于1936年)于1967年创作的讽刺荒诞戏剧《底比斯城的妓女》。后者只在布拉格和布尔诺的捷克国家剧院演出了很短的时间,并在1968年之后因苏联占领和新政权而被禁止。这两部剧都是同一时期写的。他们之间没有真正的联系或可能的影响,但我们仍然可以看到相同的互文联系和哲学思想。他们都继承了索福克勒斯的剧本,而且都深受阿努伊的《安提戈涅》的影响。这两部戏剧的哲学观点都是基于存在主义和荒诞主义戏剧(这些标签也出现在后来的分析中)。本文着重研究了克瑞翁这一人物,他在两部戏剧中成为揭示个人与集体话语的戏剧事件的主要对手。他的形象出现在邪恶的领域他质疑安提戈涅的行为。他的个性以对立面为标志,他的行为表达了他对国家的义务和人类选择之间的内心冲突。克瑞翁这个人物也很有趣,因为在两部剧中都有政治内涵:他的问题可以被解释为社会主义统治者的典型问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Primerjalna Knjizevnost
Primerjalna Knjizevnost LITERATURE, SLAVIC-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Moč odsotnega: eluzivnost resničnosti v dveh Antigonah »Nič drugega kot nič«: negativna teopolitika Sofoklove Antigone O veličini in dostojanstvu žrtve: antropološki nauk Sofoklove Antigone Svetovna primerjalna književnost The Concretization of the Literary Work of Art: Elements for a Comparison between Roman Ingarden and Wolfgang Iser
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1