The influence of body fat percentage in the anthropometric prediction of cardiac structure size in infants

Daishiro Yamaoka, Takanari Fujii, Kota Nagaoka, Takeshi Shimizu, Hiroaki Kise, Nobuo Oyama, H. Tomita, Y. Nakano, K. Mizuno
{"title":"The influence of body fat percentage in the anthropometric prediction of cardiac structure size in infants","authors":"Daishiro Yamaoka, Takanari Fujii, Kota Nagaoka, Takeshi Shimizu, Hiroaki Kise, Nobuo Oyama, H. Tomita, Y. Nakano, K. Mizuno","doi":"10.15369/sujms.33.103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Predicting normal values of cardiovascular structure size are essential in managing congenital and pediatric heart diseases. Conventionally, normal values of cardiovascular structure size are predicted based on body surface area ( BSA ) , which is calculated from the infant ʼ s weight and height. However, the predicted normal values may be more accurate if the actual body composition measurement is considered because there are large individual differences in lean body mass ( LBM ) and fat mass ( FM ) . The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of measuring body fat percentage using the PEA POD Infant Body Composition System, a novel pediatric body composition measurement tool, in assessing cardiovascular structures focused on the diameters of the aortic valve ( AVD ) and mitral valve ( MVD ) and the left ventricular mass ( LVM ) in infants. We evaluated the associations between diameters of the AVD and MVD, LVM, and percent body fat (% BF ) using the PEA POD system at term-equivalent age ( 37 - 42 weeks ) . AVD and MVD were not significantly different between groups with high or low % BF, whereas the differences between the predicted normal values and AVD and between the predicted normal values and MVD were significantly larger in the high % BF group than those in the low % BF group ( p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively ) . The high % BF group had significantly larger LVM/ height 2.16 than the low % BF group ( p < 0.05 ) , whereas no significant difference in LVM/BSA was found between the two groups. Body composition evaluating cardiovascular structure in the existing methods for predicting normal values for valve diameter and LVM are significantly influenced by % BF.","PeriodicalId":23019,"journal":{"name":"The Showa University Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Showa University Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15369/sujms.33.103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Predicting normal values of cardiovascular structure size are essential in managing congenital and pediatric heart diseases. Conventionally, normal values of cardiovascular structure size are predicted based on body surface area ( BSA ) , which is calculated from the infant ʼ s weight and height. However, the predicted normal values may be more accurate if the actual body composition measurement is considered because there are large individual differences in lean body mass ( LBM ) and fat mass ( FM ) . The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of measuring body fat percentage using the PEA POD Infant Body Composition System, a novel pediatric body composition measurement tool, in assessing cardiovascular structures focused on the diameters of the aortic valve ( AVD ) and mitral valve ( MVD ) and the left ventricular mass ( LVM ) in infants. We evaluated the associations between diameters of the AVD and MVD, LVM, and percent body fat (% BF ) using the PEA POD system at term-equivalent age ( 37 - 42 weeks ) . AVD and MVD were not significantly different between groups with high or low % BF, whereas the differences between the predicted normal values and AVD and between the predicted normal values and MVD were significantly larger in the high % BF group than those in the low % BF group ( p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively ) . The high % BF group had significantly larger LVM/ height 2.16 than the low % BF group ( p < 0.05 ) , whereas no significant difference in LVM/BSA was found between the two groups. Body composition evaluating cardiovascular structure in the existing methods for predicting normal values for valve diameter and LVM are significantly influenced by % BF.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体脂率对婴儿心脏结构大小人体测量预测的影响
预测心血管结构大小的正常值是必要的管理先天性和儿童心脏病。通常,心血管结构尺寸的正常值是根据婴儿的体重和身高计算得出的体表面积(BSA)来预测的。然而,由于瘦体质量(LBM)和脂肪质量(FM)存在较大的个体差异,如果考虑实际体成分测量,预测的正常值可能更准确。本研究的目的是评估使用PEA POD婴儿身体成分系统(一种新型儿科身体成分测量工具)测量体脂百分比在评估婴儿心血管结构(主要是主动脉瓣(AVD)和二尖瓣(MVD)的直径和左心室质量(LVM))方面的有效性。我们使用PEA POD系统在足月等龄(37 - 42周)评估了AVD直径与MVD、LVM和体脂百分比(% BF)之间的关系。高、低BF %组AVD、MVD差异无统计学意义,高BF %组预测值与AVD、预测值与MVD差异显著大于低BF %组(p < 0.05、p < 0.01)。高BF组LVM/ height为2.16,显著高于低BF组(p < 0.05),而LVM/BSA无显著差异。在现有的预测瓣膜直径和LVM正常值的方法中,身体组成评价心血管结构的方法受到% BF的显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Long-term follow-up of production of IgM and IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 among patients with COVID-19 Quantification of gray values corresponding to bone density using dental cone-beam computed tomography Dual Energy CT for determining the severity of acute pancreatitis Clinical significance of blood endocan level in breast cancer patients Objective and subjective interproximal contact between the implant and the natural tooth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1