Acceptance of Low-Sodium Hospital Diet by Cardiac Patients: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial

Bruna Fraga dos Santos, B. Eibel, Ana Lúcia Grasel Antunes, Claudia M. Martins, R. D. Giustina, Melina Borba Duarte, Izabele Vian da Silveira Corrêa
{"title":"Acceptance of Low-Sodium Hospital Diet by Cardiac Patients: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial","authors":"Bruna Fraga dos Santos, B. Eibel, Ana Lúcia Grasel Antunes, Claudia M. Martins, R. D. Giustina, Melina Borba Duarte, Izabele Vian da Silveira Corrêa","doi":"10.36660/ijcs.20200345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cardiovascular diseases are the major cause of hospitalization. Dietary salt restriction is indicated as part of clinical treatment, however, it is not always well accepted by the patients, resulting in low food intake and malnutrition. Objective: To compare acceptance of a low-sodium diet cooked with salt with a standard low-sodium diet in cardiac inpatients. Methods: A randomized controlled crossover trial in patients with low-sodium diet prescriptions (Clinical Trials NCT03481322). Patients were given a control standard low sodium diet (cooked without salt; salt [2g per meal] added by the patient at the time of consumption) on one day and on the next day patients were given the intervention diet – a low sodium diet cooked with salt (2 grams of salt, divided between preparations). Dietary acceptance was evaluated by weighing leftover food and calculating intake. A questionnaire was used to verify reasons that influenced acceptance. For data analysis, parametric data are presented as mean and standard deviation, Student’s t test was used to compare means, with significance defined as p<0.05. Results: Sixty-four patients were evaluated, with a mean age of 66 ± 11.3 years; 64% were male. There were no differences in percentage acceptance between the standard low-sodium diet and the low-sodium diet cooked with salt at lunch (p= 0.876) or at dinner (p= 0.255). Around 80% of what was offered at each meal was consumed by the patients, with no significant difference between groups. Conclusions: The low-sodium diet cooked with salt was well accepted, but there was no difference when compared with the standard low-sodium diet, which also had adequate acceptance.","PeriodicalId":32690,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36660/ijcs.20200345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular diseases are the major cause of hospitalization. Dietary salt restriction is indicated as part of clinical treatment, however, it is not always well accepted by the patients, resulting in low food intake and malnutrition. Objective: To compare acceptance of a low-sodium diet cooked with salt with a standard low-sodium diet in cardiac inpatients. Methods: A randomized controlled crossover trial in patients with low-sodium diet prescriptions (Clinical Trials NCT03481322). Patients were given a control standard low sodium diet (cooked without salt; salt [2g per meal] added by the patient at the time of consumption) on one day and on the next day patients were given the intervention diet – a low sodium diet cooked with salt (2 grams of salt, divided between preparations). Dietary acceptance was evaluated by weighing leftover food and calculating intake. A questionnaire was used to verify reasons that influenced acceptance. For data analysis, parametric data are presented as mean and standard deviation, Student’s t test was used to compare means, with significance defined as p<0.05. Results: Sixty-four patients were evaluated, with a mean age of 66 ± 11.3 years; 64% were male. There were no differences in percentage acceptance between the standard low-sodium diet and the low-sodium diet cooked with salt at lunch (p= 0.876) or at dinner (p= 0.255). Around 80% of what was offered at each meal was consumed by the patients, with no significant difference between groups. Conclusions: The low-sodium diet cooked with salt was well accepted, but there was no difference when compared with the standard low-sodium diet, which also had adequate acceptance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏病患者接受医院低钠饮食:一项随机对照交叉试验
背景:心血管疾病是住院的主要原因。限制饮食盐是临床治疗的一部分,但并不总是被患者所接受,导致食物摄入量低和营养不良。目的:比较心脏病住院患者对盐煮低钠饮食和标准低钠饮食的接受程度。方法:对低钠饮食处方患者进行随机对照交叉试验(临床试验NCT03481322)。患者给予对照标准低钠饮食(煮熟时不加盐;盐(每餐2克,由患者在食用时添加)在第一天,第二天给予干预饮食-低钠饮食,用盐煮熟(2克盐,分成两份)。通过称量剩余食物和计算摄入量来评估饮食接受度。使用问卷来验证影响接受度的原因。数据分析时,参数数据以均数和标准差表示,均数比较采用Student’s t检验,显著性定义为p<0.05。结果:共纳入64例患者,平均年龄66±11.3岁;64%为男性。标准低钠饮食与午餐(p= 0.876)或晚餐(p= 0.255)用盐烹制的低钠饮食的接受率没有差异。每顿饭中大约80%的食物被患者吃掉,两组之间没有显著差异。结论:盐煮低钠饮食接受度高,但与标准低钠饮食相比无差异,标准低钠饮食也有足够的接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Quality of Life in Patients After Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction The Relationship between Basal Serum Lipoprotein(a) Levels and the Pulmonary Artery to Ascending Aorta Ratio in COVID-19 Survivors Religiosity and Spirituality: The Relationship Between Psychosocial Factors and Cardiovascular Health High Cardiorespiratory Optimal Point Values Are Related to Cardiovascular Mortality in Men Aged 46 to 70 Years: a Prospective Cohort Study Association of Dietary Inflammatory Potential in Metabolically Healthy and Metabolically Unhealthy Obese Individuals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1