“Healthcare at its finest”: Patient perspectives on virtual care appointments in primary care

Rachelle Ashcroft, B. Ryan, Kavita Mehta, J. Brown, Simon Lam, L. Dolovich, Amélie Boudreault, J. Rayner, J. Grenier, S. Dahrouge, Sally Abudiab, Sandeep Gill, C. Donnelly, J. Alloo, D. Verrilli
{"title":"“Healthcare at its finest”: Patient perspectives on virtual care appointments in primary care","authors":"Rachelle Ashcroft, B. Ryan, Kavita Mehta, J. Brown, Simon Lam, L. Dolovich, Amélie Boudreault, J. Rayner, J. Grenier, S. Dahrouge, Sally Abudiab, Sandeep Gill, C. Donnelly, J. Alloo, D. Verrilli","doi":"10.1370/afm.20.s1.2944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: COVID-19 led to a rapid uptake of virtual care appointments (telephone and video) in primary care (PC). Decisions on the future of virtual care need to consider patien ts’ experiences. Objective: To understand patients’ experience with virtual care appointments. Study Design: Mixed methods study, presentation focus on qualitative data. A semi-structured interview guide was co-created with patient advisors. A broad recruitment strategy included emailing patient and community organizations, research team network, and social media. Data analyzed using thematic analysis. Participant Eligibility: At least one synchronous virtual encounter in PC since March 2020. Setting: Ontario (Canada) offers universal coverage for PC visits with no co-payment. Results: N=55 interviews were conducted between January 2021 and March 2021. Technology: Telephone was preferred modality. Access: Virtual care was convenient and saved patients’ time and money. Appointment scheduling & booking processes were barriers. Privacy and Confidentiality: No concerns about privacy & confidentiality in patients’ environment, yet participants wanted assurance about privacy & confidentiality in providers’ environm ent. Communication: Providers’ detailed explanations, patients’ health literacy levels, and asynchronous methods of sharing information and documents before and/or after appointments facilitated good experiences. Lack of body-language was a barrier. Therapeutic Relationship: Strong pre-existing relationships facilitated good virtual care experiences. Participants expressed concerns about long-term erosion of relationship when using virtual care. Whole-Person Care: Virtual care facilitated easy inclusion of family members in appointments. However, virtual care appointments were more problem-focused and included less conversation topics outside of specific problem","PeriodicalId":10691,"journal":{"name":"Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.20.s1.2944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Context: COVID-19 led to a rapid uptake of virtual care appointments (telephone and video) in primary care (PC). Decisions on the future of virtual care need to consider patien ts’ experiences. Objective: To understand patients’ experience with virtual care appointments. Study Design: Mixed methods study, presentation focus on qualitative data. A semi-structured interview guide was co-created with patient advisors. A broad recruitment strategy included emailing patient and community organizations, research team network, and social media. Data analyzed using thematic analysis. Participant Eligibility: At least one synchronous virtual encounter in PC since March 2020. Setting: Ontario (Canada) offers universal coverage for PC visits with no co-payment. Results: N=55 interviews were conducted between January 2021 and March 2021. Technology: Telephone was preferred modality. Access: Virtual care was convenient and saved patients’ time and money. Appointment scheduling & booking processes were barriers. Privacy and Confidentiality: No concerns about privacy & confidentiality in patients’ environment, yet participants wanted assurance about privacy & confidentiality in providers’ environm ent. Communication: Providers’ detailed explanations, patients’ health literacy levels, and asynchronous methods of sharing information and documents before and/or after appointments facilitated good experiences. Lack of body-language was a barrier. Therapeutic Relationship: Strong pre-existing relationships facilitated good virtual care experiences. Participants expressed concerns about long-term erosion of relationship when using virtual care. Whole-Person Care: Virtual care facilitated easy inclusion of family members in appointments. However, virtual care appointments were more problem-focused and included less conversation topics outside of specific problem
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“最好的医疗保健”:患者对初级保健中虚拟护理预约的看法
背景:COVID-19导致初级保健(PC)迅速采用虚拟护理预约(电话和视频)。决定虚拟医疗的未来需要考虑病人的经历。目的:了解虚拟预约护理的患者体验。研究设计:混合方法研究,以定性数据为主。与耐心的顾问共同编写了半结构化的面试指南。广泛的招聘策略包括给患者和社区组织、研究团队网络和社交媒体发电子邮件。数据分析采用专题分析。参与者资格:自2020年3月起在PC上至少进行过一次同步虚拟会议。设置:安大略省(加拿大)提供普遍覆盖的个人电脑访问没有共同支付。结果:在2021年1月至2021年3月期间进行了N=55次访谈。技术:电话是首选的方式。访问:虚拟护理很方便,节省了患者的时间和金钱。预约安排和预订流程是障碍。隐私和保密性:不担心患者环境中的隐私和保密性,但参与者希望确保提供者环境中的隐私和保密性。沟通:提供者的详细解释、患者的健康素养水平以及预约前后共享信息和文件的异步方法促进了良好的体验。缺乏肢体语言是一个障碍。治疗关系:牢固的既存关系促进了良好的虚拟护理体验。参与者表达了使用虚拟护理对长期关系侵蚀的担忧。全人护理:虚拟护理便于家庭成员预约。然而,虚拟护理预约更注重问题,在特定问题之外的谈话话题更少
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Frequency of Primary Care Visits for Substance Use in Ontario, Canada Public Health and Primary Health Care Collaboration in Eight High-Income Countries During the Covid-19 Pandemic Measuring Chronic Care Management During the Telehealth Integration Period in Urban Clinics of an Integrated Commercial Plan Primary Care Workload Experience COVID-19 Related Visits Versus Non-COVID-19 Visits in Three Michigan Nursing Homes During the Pandemic: Virtual Visit Trends
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1