Analysis of high-resolution global gravity field models for the estimation of International Height Reference System (IHRS) coordinates in Argentina

IF 0.9 Q4 REMOTE SENSING Journal of Geodetic Science Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1515/jogs-2022-0139
C. Tocho, Ezequiel D. Antokoletz, Agustín R. Gómez, H. Guagni, D. Piñón
{"title":"Analysis of high-resolution global gravity field models for the estimation of International Height Reference System (IHRS) coordinates in Argentina","authors":"C. Tocho, Ezequiel D. Antokoletz, Agustín R. Gómez, H. Guagni, D. Piñón","doi":"10.1515/jogs-2022-0139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Following the definition and realization of the International Height Reference System (IHRS), the vertical coordinate of a given point at the Earth’s surface can be obtained from the computation of the geopotential value from a harmonic expansion of a Global Gravity Model of High-Resolution (GGM-HR) or based on the computation of a local or regional pure gravimetric geoid or quasigeoid. Therefore, an evaluation of the accuracy of GGMs-HR and the geoid model available is needed in order to assess its capability to infer IHRS coordinates. In this study, different GGMs-HR are evaluated against 2287 benchmarks in Argentina. Moreover, the most recent geoid model of Argentina is also evaluated. Geoid undulations at these benchmarks are obtained based on ellipsoidal and orthometric heights in the local vertical datum. Results suggest that among the evaluated GGMs-HR, XGM2019e provides the best agreement with the observed geoid heights, but none of them is accurate enough in order to infer vertical coordinates in the IHRS. Similar conclusions are obtained for the local geoid model for Argentina demonstrating the necessity for a more precise geoid model, following the standards and recommendations given for the IHRS.","PeriodicalId":44569,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodetic Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geodetic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jogs-2022-0139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Following the definition and realization of the International Height Reference System (IHRS), the vertical coordinate of a given point at the Earth’s surface can be obtained from the computation of the geopotential value from a harmonic expansion of a Global Gravity Model of High-Resolution (GGM-HR) or based on the computation of a local or regional pure gravimetric geoid or quasigeoid. Therefore, an evaluation of the accuracy of GGMs-HR and the geoid model available is needed in order to assess its capability to infer IHRS coordinates. In this study, different GGMs-HR are evaluated against 2287 benchmarks in Argentina. Moreover, the most recent geoid model of Argentina is also evaluated. Geoid undulations at these benchmarks are obtained based on ellipsoidal and orthometric heights in the local vertical datum. Results suggest that among the evaluated GGMs-HR, XGM2019e provides the best agreement with the observed geoid heights, but none of them is accurate enough in order to infer vertical coordinates in the IHRS. Similar conclusions are obtained for the local geoid model for Argentina demonstrating the necessity for a more precise geoid model, following the standards and recommendations given for the IHRS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿根廷用于估算国际高度参考系统(IHRS)坐标的高分辨率全球重力场模型分析
随着国际高程参考系(IHRS)的定义和实现,地球表面某点的垂直坐标可以通过高分辨率全球重力模型(GGM-HR)的调和展开或局部或区域纯重力大地水准面或拟大地水准面计算得到。因此,需要对GGMs-HR和现有大地水准面模型的精度进行评估,以评估其推断IHRS坐标的能力。在本研究中,对阿根廷2287个基准进行了不同的GGMs-HR评估。此外,还对阿根廷最新的大地水准面模型进行了评价。这些基准的大地水准面波动是根据当地垂直基准面上的椭球面和正交高度获得的。结果表明,在评估的GGMs-HR中,XGM2019e与实测大地水准面高度的一致性最好,但没有一个精度足以推断IHRS中的垂直坐标。阿根廷当地的大地水准面模型也得到了类似的结论,表明有必要按照IHRS给出的标准和建议建立更精确的大地水准面模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geodetic Science
Journal of Geodetic Science REMOTE SENSING-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
3
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Displacement analysis of the October 30, 2020 (M w = 6.9), Samos (Aegean Sea) earthquake A field test of compact active transponders for InSAR geodesy Estimating the slip rate in the North Tabriz Fault using focal mechanism data and GPS velocity field Simulating VLBI observations to BeiDou and Galileo satellites in L-band for frame ties On initial data in adjustments of the geometric levelling networks (on the mean of paired observations)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1